BABYL OPTIONS:
Version: 5
Labels:
Note:   This is the header of an rmail file.
Note:   If you are seeing it in rmail,
Note:    it means the file has no messages in it.

1,,
Summary-line: 12-Feb   6042-tas@theory.lcs.mit.  #a test
Return-Path: <meyer@lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from MIT.EDU (PACIFIC-CARRIER-ANNEX.MIT.EDU) by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA22984; Mon, 12 Feb 96 10:09:33 EST
Received: from MIT.MIT.EDU by MIT.EDU with SMTP
	id AA18376; Mon, 12 Feb 96 10:09:03 EST
Received: from slip-meyer.lcs.mit.edu by MIT.MIT.EDU (5.61/4.7) id AA11929; Mon, 12 Feb 96 10:09:23 EST
Message-Id: <311F583F.4E70@lcs.mit.edu>
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 1996 10:09:51 -0500
From: "Albert R. Meyer" <meyer@lcs.mit.edu>
Organization: MIT Lab. for CS
X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.0 (Macintosh; I; 68K)
Mime-Version: 1.0
To: 6042-tas@theory.lcs.mit.edu
Subject: a test
X-Url: ftp://theory.lcs.mit.edu/pub/classes/6.042/homepage.html
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

*** EOOH ***
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 1996 10:09:51 -0500
From: "Albert R. Meyer" <meyer@lcs.mit.edu>
Organization: MIT Lab. for CS
X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.0 (Macintosh; I; 68K)
To: 6042-tas@theory.lcs.mit.edu
Subject: a test
X-Url: ftp://theory.lcs.mit.edu/pub/classes/6.042/homepage.html

ignore this


0, unseen,,
Summary-line: 12-Feb  -teachers@theory.lcs.mit.  #test
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <meyer@lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from MIT.EDU (PACIFIC-CARRIER-ANNEX.MIT.EDU) by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA07022; Mon, 12 Feb 96 21:44:11 EST
Received: from MIT.MIT.EDU by MIT.EDU with SMTP
	id AA02183; Mon, 12 Feb 96 21:43:39 EST
Received: from slip-meyer.lcs.mit.edu by MIT.MIT.EDU (5.61/4.7) id AA09609; Mon, 12 Feb 96 21:44:00 EST
Message-Id: <311FFB0D.3992@lcs.mit.edu>
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 1996 21:44:29 -0500
From: "Albert R. Meyer" <meyer@lcs.mit.edu>
Organization: MIT Lab. for CS
X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.0 (Macintosh; I; 68K)
Mime-Version: 1.0
To: 6042-teachers@theory.lcs.mit.edu
Subject: test
X-Url: ftp://theory.lcs.mit.edu/pub/classes/6.042/homepage.html
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------1AF545AE34E2"

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

--------------1AF545AE34E2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

IGNORE THIS

--------------1AF545AE34E2
Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline; filename="homepage.html"

<BASE HREF="ftp://theory.lcs.mit.edu/pub/classes/6.042/homepage.html">

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//IETF//DTD HTML//EN">

<html>

<head>

<title>6.042J/18.062J</title>

<link rev="made" href="mailto:meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu">

</head>

<body>

<ul><h1>MIT Course 6.042J/18.062J<br>
Mathematics for Computer Science</h1>
</ul>

<h2><a href="handouts.html">Handouts </a> </h2>

<h2> <a href="section.html">Tutorial and Recitation Assignments</a></h2>

<h2>Lecturers</h2>
<ul>
<a href="http://theory.lcs.mit.edu/~meyer/">Prof. Albert R. Meyer</a> and
<a href="http://theory.lcs.mit.edu/~rivest/">Prof. Ronald L. Rivest</a>
<ul><a href="mailto:6042-lecturers@theory.lcs.mit.edu">6042-lecturers@theory.lcs.mit.edu</a></ul>
</ul>


<h2>Teaching Assistants</h2>
<ul>
<li>Andrew Chou
<li><a href="http://theory.lcs.mit.edu/~parry/">Parry Husbands</a>
<li><a href="http://theory.lcs.mit.edu/~kucan/">Jakov Kucan</a>
<li><a href="http://theory.lcs.mit.edu/~miccianc/">Daniele Micciancio</a>
<ul><a href="mailto:6042-tas@theory.lcs.mit.edu">6042-tas@theory.lcs.mit.edu</a></ul>
</ul>

<ul>
<strong>Weekly Office Hours</strong><br>
Feel free to attend anyone's office hours:
<ul>
<li> Wed  3:00-5:00  Jakov/Parry  NE43-334
<li> Thu  4:30-6:30  Jakov/Parry  NE43-334
<li> Thu  5:00-7:00  Daniele      NE43-368
<li> Fri  10:00-12:00 Andrew      NE43-311
</ul></ul>

<h2>Schedule</h2>

<ul>

<li>Lecture: TR 2:30-4:00, room 4-370

<li>Recitation 1: F 1:00-2:00, room 26-210
    
<li>Recitation 2: F 2:00-3:00, room 26-210
    
<li>Recitation 3: F 3:00-4:00, room 34-301
     
<li>Recitation 4: F 2:00-3:00, room 34-301 (<em>Note change in room!</em>)

</ul>

<h2>Texts</h2>

<strong>Required:</strong><br>
Kenneth H. Rosen.  <cite>Discrete Mathematics and Its Applications,</cite>
third edition.  McGraw Hill, 1995.<p>

<strong>Recommended:</strong><br>
<li>Lufti A. Lutfiyya. <cite>Essentials of Probability.</cite>
Research and Education Association, 1994.

<li>Antonella Cupillari.  <cite>The Nuts and Bolts of Proofs.</cite>
PWS Publishing, Boston.  1989.<br>

<ul>
<h2>Course description</h2>

Prereq.: 18.02 or 18.023 or 18.024<br>
U(1, 2) 5-0-7<p>

Mathematical tools and methods for computer science and engineering.
Emphasis on development of rigorous thinking, analytical skills, and
mathematical sophistication while learning elementary discrete
mathematics.  Topics: mathematical proofs; induction and
well-ordering; divisibility and congruences; asymptotic notation and
growth of functions; sets, relations, functions, and graphs; counting
theory; recurrences and generating functions; discrete probability.<p>
</ul>

<h2>Bug Reports</h2>
<ul>
<a href="mailto:6042-teachers@theory.lcs.mit.edu">6042-teachers@theory.lcs.mit.edu</a>
</ul>

</body>

</html>

--------------1AF545AE34E2--



0, unseen,,
Summary-line: 13-Feb            ktaylor@MIT.EDU  #information sheet.
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <ktaylor@MIT.EDU>
Received: from MIT.EDU (SOUTH-STATION-ANNEX.MIT.EDU) by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA27292; Tue, 13 Feb 96 17:29:46 EST
Received: from M16-034-13.MIT.EDU by MIT.EDU with SMTP
	id AA22312; Tue, 13 Feb 96 17:29:16 EST
From: ktaylor@MIT.EDU
Received: by m16-034-13.MIT.EDU (AIX 3.2/UCB 5.64/4.7) id AA22339; Tue, 13 Feb 1996 17:29:40 -0500
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 1996 17:29:40 -0500
Message-Id: <9602132229.AA22339@m16-034-13.MIT.EDU>
To: 6042-teachers@theory.lcs.mit.edu
Mime-Version: 1.0
Subject: information sheet.
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Mailer: NCSA Mosaic 2.6 L10N+ on RS/6000 AIX
X-Url: ftp://theory.lcs.mit.edu/pub/classes/6.042/handouts.html


Hi.  I was unable to attend the first meeting of class, so I did not get a chance to 
fill out the information sheet.  Here is all the info you require.

Name:  Kenya Taylor
Department: 6-3, junior
Registration Status: credit
E-mail:  ktaylor@mit.edu
Tutorial: 10am (could someone tell me where this will be held tomorrow?)
Recitation:  Fri 2

Thanks.

Kenya Taylor


1,,
Summary-line: 27-Feb               jnye@MIT.EDU  #Joining 6.042
Return-Path: <jnye@MIT.EDU>
Received: from MIT.EDU (PACIFIC-CARRIER-ANNEX.MIT.EDU) by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA28168; Tue, 27 Feb 96 17:08:06 EST
Received: from MIT.MIT.EDU by MIT.EDU with SMTP
	id AA06196; Tue, 27 Feb 96 17:07:32 EST
Received: from W20-575-94.MIT.EDU by MIT.MIT.EDU (5.61/4.7) id AA09948; Tue, 27 Feb 96 17:08:06 EST
Sender: jnye@MIT.EDU
Message-Id: <313380C5.4EAB@mit.edu>
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 1996 17:08:05 -0500
From: Jack Nye <jnye@MIT.EDU>
Organization: Massachusetts Institute of Technology
X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.0 (X11; I; SunOS 5.3 sun4m)
Mime-Version: 1.0
To: 6042-tas@theory.lcs.mit.edu
Subject: Joining 6.042
X-Url: ftp://theory.lcs.mit.edu/pub/classes/6.042/homepage.html
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

*** EOOH ***
Sender: jnye@MIT.EDU
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 1996 17:08:05 -0500
From: Jack Nye <jnye@MIT.EDU>
Organization: Massachusetts Institute of Technology
X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.0 (X11; I; SunOS 5.3 sun4m)
To: 6042-tas@theory.lcs.mit.edu
Subject: Joining 6.042
X-Url: ftp://theory.lcs.mit.edu/pub/classes/6.042/homepage.html

I joined 6.042 today, and Prof. Meyer said I should
write this address to get a Tutorial/Recitation
assignment as soon as possible.

I am free any time after noon on Wednessdays and Fridays.

Thank you,
Jack Nye
<jnye@mit.edu>


1,,
Summary-line: 28-Feb            banerji@MIT.EDU  #Final
Return-Path: <banerji@MIT.EDU>
Received: from MIT.EDU (PACIFIC-CARRIER-ANNEX.MIT.EDU) by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA22050; Wed, 28 Feb 96 19:01:20 EST
Received: from MIT.MIT.EDU by MIT.EDU with SMTP
	id AA13672; Wed, 28 Feb 96 19:00:48 EST
Received: from W20-575-106.MIT.EDU by MIT.MIT.EDU (5.61/4.7) id AA25358; Wed, 28 Feb 96 19:01:21 EST
Sender: banerji@MIT.EDU
Message-Id: <3134ECD2.41C6@mit.edu>
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 1996 19:01:22 -0500
From: Pratip K Banerji <banerji@MIT.EDU>
Organization: Massachusetts Institute of Technology
X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.0 (X11; I; IRIX 5.2 IP22)
Mime-Version: 1.0
To: 6042-teachers@theory.lcs.mit.edu
Subject: Final
X-Url: ftp://theory.lcs/pub/classes/6.042/homepage.html
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

*** EOOH ***
Sender: banerji@MIT.EDU
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 1996 19:01:22 -0500
From: Pratip K Banerji <banerji@MIT.EDU>
Organization: Massachusetts Institute of Technology
X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.0 (X11; I; IRIX 5.2 IP22)
To: 6042-teachers@theory.lcs.mit.edu
Subject: Final
X-Url: ftp://theory.lcs/pub/classes/6.042/homepage.html

The syllabus states that there is to be a final for 6.042 during finals
exams week, but the final exam schedule makes no note of it.

Which is correct? Thanks.
-- 
Pratip K. Banerji                       
banerji@mit.edu
http://www.mit.edu:8001/people/banerji/banerji.html


1,,
Summary-line: 29-Feb             kgajos@MIT.EDU  #quiz conflict
Return-Path: <kgajos@MIT.EDU>
Received: from MIT.EDU (SOUTH-STATION-ANNEX.MIT.EDU) by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA10623; Thu, 29 Feb 96 16:15:59 EST
Received: from ROTCH-30.MIT.EDU by MIT.EDU with SMTP
	id AA07441; Thu, 29 Feb 96 16:15:23 EST
From: kgajos@MIT.EDU
Received: by rotch-30.MIT.EDU (931110.SGI/4.7) id AA22767; Thu, 29 Feb 96 16:17:04 -0500
Message-Id: <9602292117.AA22767@rotch-30.MIT.EDU>
To: 6042-teachers@theory.lcs.mit.edu
Subject: quiz conflict
Date: Thu, 29 Feb 1996 16:17:04 EST

*** EOOH ***
From: kgajos@MIT.EDU
To: 6042-teachers@theory.lcs.mit.edu
Subject: quiz conflict
Date: Thu, 29 Feb 1996 16:17:04 EST

	I have just realised that the first two
quizes in 6.042 are not going to be given during our
class time. The problem is that I have a class on
Tuesdays betwen 7 p.m. and 10.30 p.m. 

	I am happy to take the quiz at 5 p.m.

			yours,

			Krzysztof Gajos



1,,
Summary-line: 29-Feb             tchien@MIT.EDU  #tutorial assignment
Return-Path: <tchien@MIT.EDU>
Received: from toxicwaste.media.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA10725; Thu, 29 Feb 96 16:21:21 EST
Received: (from tchien@localhost) by toxicwaste.media.mit.edu (8.6.10/8.6.10) id QAA18102; Thu, 29 Feb 1996 16:21:18 -0500
From: Timothy Chien <tchien@MIT.EDU>
Message-Id: <199602292121.QAA18102@toxicwaste.media.mit.edu>
To: 6042-tas@theory.lcs.mit.edu
Subject: tutorial assignment
Date: Thu, 29 Feb 1996 16:21:17 EST

*** EOOH ***
From: Timothy Chien <tchien@MIT.EDU>
To: 6042-tas@theory.lcs.mit.edu
Subject: tutorial assignment
Date: Thu, 29 Feb 1996 16:21:17 EST

hi,

i am assigned to the W12 section (not W3 section)..thanks..




--tim


1,,
Summary-line: 29-Feb               ooze@MIT.EDU  #Conflict with Quiz 1
Return-Path: <ooze@MIT.EDU>
Received: from MIT.EDU (PACIFIC-CARRIER-ANNEX.MIT.EDU) by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA12049; Thu, 29 Feb 96 17:16:29 EST
Received: from RINGWORLD.MIT.EDU by MIT.EDU with SMTP
	id AA00708; Thu, 29 Feb 96 17:15:53 EST
Received: (from ooze@localhost) by ringworld.MIT.EDU (8.6.11/8.6.11) id RAA26191; Thu, 29 Feb 1996 17:16:25 -0500
From: Owen W Ozier <ooze@MIT.EDU>
Message-Id: <199602292216.RAA26191@ringworld.MIT.EDU>
To: 6042-teachers@theory.lcs.mit.edu
Subject: Conflict with Quiz 1
Date: Thu, 29 Feb 1996 17:16:23 EST

*** EOOH ***
From: Owen W Ozier <ooze@MIT.EDU>
To: 6042-teachers@theory.lcs.mit.edu
Subject: Conflict with Quiz 1
Date: Thu, 29 Feb 1996 17:16:23 EST


I will be unable to attend the quiz 7-9 on Tuesday due
to a class occurring from 7-10:30 that very evening.
I could, however, attend from 5-7pm on Tuesday, or even
6-8pm on Monday (though I would rather not the latter).

Please let me know when and where I should take Quiz 1.

Thanks,

-Owen W. Ozier  (Recitation 3PM in 34-301, Tutorial 3PM in 24-316)
<ooze@mit.edu>


1,,
Summary-line: 29-Feb              kylee@MIT.EDU  #Tutorial Exercise
Return-Path: <kylee@MIT.EDU>
Received: from MIT.EDU (SOUTH-STATION-ANNEX.MIT.EDU) by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA13362; Thu, 29 Feb 96 18:27:18 EST
Received: from JOSHS.MIT.EDU by MIT.EDU with SMTP
	id AA25263; Thu, 29 Feb 96 18:26:43 EST
Received: from joshs by joshs.mit.edu (8.6.10/4.7) id SAA00295; Thu, 29 Feb 1996 18:27:13 -0500
Sender: kylee@MIT.EDU
Message-Id: <3136364E.4E728514@mit.edu>
Date: Thu, 29 Feb 1996 18:27:10 -0500
From: Kayi Lee <kylee@MIT.EDU>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.0 (X11; I; Linux 1.2.13 i586)
Mime-Version: 1.0
To: 6042-tas@theory.lcs.mit.edu
Subject: Tutorial Exercise
X-Url: ftp://theory.lcs.mit.edu/pub/classes/6.042/homepage.html
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

*** EOOH ***
Sender: kylee@MIT.EDU
Date: Thu, 29 Feb 1996 18:27:10 -0500
From: Kayi Lee <kylee@MIT.EDU>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.0 (X11; I; Linux 1.2.13 i586)
To: 6042-tas@theory.lcs.mit.edu
Subject: Tutorial Exercise
X-Url: ftp://theory.lcs.mit.edu/pub/classes/6.042/homepage.html

Hi. I have some opinion on the tutorial for 6.042. I find that every
time in the tutorial, there are only one or two sheets of tutorial
questions. We have a hard time to share and read the questions and it
tskes us some time to read the question. Also, we do not know the
problem of the other group so sometimes I find it difficult to catch
what he is going to solve. So can you actually give each of us a
separate sheet of the tutorial exercise so that we can be more clear
about what's going on? Thanks a lot.
-- 
Kayi Lee


0, unseen,,
Summary-line:  3-Mar           jstipins@MIT.EDU  #6.042 Exam
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <jstipins@MIT.EDU>
Received: from MIT.EDU (SOUTH-STATION-ANNEX.MIT.EDU) by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA02497; Sun, 03 Mar 96 16:37:34 EST
Received: from DZINTARS.MIT.EDU by MIT.EDU with SMTP
	id AA23509; Sun, 3 Mar 96 16:36:57 EST
Received: from dzintars.mit.edu by dzintars.mit.edu (8.7.1/4.7) id VAA10033; Sun, 3 Mar 1996 21:37:34 GMT
Sender: jstipins@MIT.EDU
Message-Id: <313A111D.590AED42@mit.edu>
Date: Sun, 03 Mar 1996 16:37:33 -0500
From: Janis Stipins III <jstipins@MIT.EDU>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.0 (X11; I; Linux 1.2.13 i586)
Mime-Version: 1.0
To: 6042-lecturers@theory.lcs.mit.edu
Cc: 6042-tas@theory.lcs.mit.edu
Subject: 6.042 Exam
X-Url: ftp://theory.lcs.mit.edu/pub/classes/6.042/homepage.html
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Sorry for the late notice, but it looks like I have a conflict for
the first exam; I have a class at 8:30 that night that I cannot 
afford to miss.

I suppose that one option I have is to try and finish the exam early,
but I'd rather not have to count on that.  Is it possible that I could
take the exam earlier that night, say, at 6pm?  I would promise, of 
course, not to discuss the exam with anyone on the off chance that I 
finish before 7pm.  

Please let me know about this as soon as possible.

Thank you,
-Janis Stipins III


0, unseen,,
Summary-line:  3-Mar              aseem@MIT.EDU  #archive holes
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <aseem@MIT.EDU>
Received: from MIT.EDU (PACIFIC-CARRIER-ANNEX.MIT.EDU) by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA02659; Sun, 03 Mar 96 16:50:45 EST
Received: from MIT.MIT.EDU by MIT.EDU with SMTP
	id AA20087; Sun, 3 Mar 96 16:50:07 EST
Received: from W20-575-109.MIT.EDU by MIT.MIT.EDU (5.61/4.7) id AA03579; Sun, 3 Mar 96 16:50:44 EST
Sender: aseem@MIT.EDU
Message-Id: <313A1432.61AA@mit.edu>
Date: Sun, 03 Mar 1996 16:50:42 -0500
From: Aseem O Agarwala <aseem@MIT.EDU>
Organization: Massachusetts Institute of Technology
X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.0 (X11; I; SunOS 5.3 sun4m)
Mime-Version: 1.0
To: 6042-teachers@theory.lcs.mit.edu
Subject: archive holes
X-Url: ftp://theory.lcs.mit.edu/pub/classes/6.042/homepage.html
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

There are a couple holes in your archives.  For fall 95, there are
quiz 1 solutions but no quiz 1.  For Spring 95, the link to
pset2 does not work.  The file is missing.

Aseem


0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <cjlin@MIT.EDU>
Received: from MIT.EDU (SOUTH-STATION-ANNEX.MIT.EDU) by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA06188; Sun, 03 Mar 96 22:17:31 EST
Received: from WHISKAS.MIT.EDU by MIT.EDU with SMTP
	id AA15113; Sun, 3 Mar 96 22:16:53 EST
Message-Id: <2.2.32.19960304031728.0030eaf8@po7.mit.edu>
X-Sender: cjlin@po7.mit.edu
X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Pro Version 2.2 (32)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date: Sun, 03 Mar 1996 22:17:28 -0500
To: 6042-teachers@theory.lcs.mit.edu
From: Calvin Lin <cjlin@MIT.EDU>
Subject: Tuesday's exam

Sorry for the late notice, but only after looking through my schedule for
next week tonight, I realize that I won't be able to make it to the exam
from 7 to 9 on Tuesday.  I am free from 5-7 tuesday.  Also, if that is
impossible, I do have time free Monday afternoon and evening (Anytime
between 4 - 8).  Again, sorry for the late notice.

Calvin Lin



0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <tchien@MIT.EDU>
Received: from MIT.EDU (SOUTH-STATION-ANNEX.MIT.EDU) by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA02094; Fri, 15 Mar 96 14:41:36 EST
Received: from M38-370-2.MIT.EDU by MIT.EDU with SMTP
	id AA24797; Fri, 15 Mar 96 14:40:52 EST
Received: by m38-370-2.MIT.EDU (5.0/4.7) id AA09065; Fri, 15 Mar 1996 14:41:34 -0500
Message-Id: <9603151941.AA09065@m38-370-2.MIT.EDU>
To: 6042-tas@theory.lcs
Subject: add me to 6042-students
Date: Fri, 15 Mar 1996 14:41:33 EST
From: Timothy Chien <tchien@MIT.EDU>
Content-Length: 102

i haven't been receiving mail addressed to 6042-students
and i am taking the class..thanks..



--tim


1,,
Summary-line:  8-Feb   kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu  #Re: Office hours 
Return-Path: <kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from eagle.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA27790; Thu, 08 Feb 96 21:45:20 EST
Received: from eagle.lcs.mit.edu by eagle.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA13007; Thu, 08 Feb 96 21:43:28 EST
Message-Id: <199602090243.AA13007@eagle.lcs.mit.edu>
To: achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Andrew Chou)
Cc: 6042-tas
Subject: Re: Office hours 
In-Reply-To: Your message of Thu, 08 Feb 96 12:16:21 -0500.
             <199602081716.AA05889@condor.lcs.mit.edu> 
X-Mailer: exmh version 1.3gamma 3/18/94
Date: Thu, 08 Feb 96 21:43:25 -0500
From: kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu

*** EOOH ***
To: achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Andrew Chou)
Cc: 6042-tas
Subject: Re: Office hours 
In-Reply-To: Your message of Thu, 08 Feb 96 12:16:21 -0500.
             <199602081716.AA05889@condor.lcs.mit.edu> 
X-Mailer: exmh version 1.3gamma 3/18/94
Date: Thu, 08 Feb 96 21:43:25 -0500
From: kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu


Parry and I will take care of

Wed 3-5 and
Thu 4:30-6:30

We are both in NE34-334.

--Jakov

p.s. Andrew, I am teaching recitations at 2 and 3 tomorrow in 34-301. Is that 
right?





0, unseen,,
Summary-line:  9-Feb   achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu  #
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from condor.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA07426; Fri, 09 Feb 96 10:44:05 EST
From: achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Andrew Chou)
Received: by condor.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA06384; Fri, 09 Feb 96 10:43:06 EST
Date: Fri, 09 Feb 96 10:43:06 EST
Message-Id: <199602091543.AA06384@condor.lcs.mit.edu>
To: 6042-tas

I put in office hours to the homepage.
Please check if they're agreeable.

-- Andrew


0, unseen,,
Summary-line: 12-Feb  dmjones@theory.lcs.mit.ed  #[pkamvyss@MIT.EDU: 6.042 Tutorials times and places]
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <dmjones@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from sandpiper.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA22486; Mon, 12 Feb 96 09:39:36 EST
From: dmjones@theory.lcs.mit.edu (David M. Jones)
Received: by sandpiper.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA24048; Mon, 12 Feb 96 09:40:03 EST
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 96 09:40:03 EST
Message-Id: <199602121440.AA24048@sandpiper.lcs.mit.edu>
To: 6042-tas
Subject: [pkamvyss@MIT.EDU: 6.042 Tutorials times and places]


Return-Path: <pkamvyss@MIT.EDU>
To: 6042-secretary@theory.lcs.mit.edu
Subject: 6.042 Tutorials times and places
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 1996 00:36:25 EST
From: Panayiotis Kamvysselis <pkamvyss@MIT.EDU>

Could you tell me the hours and places where each tutorials
section meets? Am I assigned to any of them?
Thanks,
-Pan



0, unseen,,
Summary-line: 12-Feb  miccianc@theory.lcs.mit.e  #Re: [pkamvyss@MIT.EDU: 6.042 Tutorials times and places]
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <miccianc@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from kingfisher.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA22683; Mon, 12 Feb 96 09:53:24 EST
From: miccianc@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Daniele Micciancio)
Received: by kingfisher.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA16265; Mon, 12 Feb 96 09:58:16 EST
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 96 09:58:16 EST
Message-Id: <199602121458.AA16265@kingfisher.lcs.mit.edu>
To: pkamvyss@MIT.EDU
Subject: Re: [pkamvyss@MIT.EDU: 6.042 Tutorials times and places]
Cc: 6042-tas


Your tutorial is 

	Kamuysselis Pamayiotis, 11am 38-495

You can look at the course homepage:

	ftp://theory.lcs.mit.edu/pub/classes/6.042/homepage.html

for more information (other tutorials, office hours, etc.).

--Daniele


0, unseen,,
Summary-line: 12-Feb  dmjones@theory.lcs.mit.ed  #[dhermann@MIT.EDU: recitation and tutorial conflict]
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <dmjones@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from sandpiper.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA05623; Mon, 12 Feb 96 19:43:24 EST
From: dmjones@theory.lcs.mit.edu (David M. Jones)
Received: by sandpiper.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA24738; Mon, 12 Feb 96 19:43:55 EST
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 96 19:43:55 EST
Message-Id: <199602130043.AA24738@sandpiper.lcs.mit.edu>
To: 6042-tas
Subject: [dhermann@MIT.EDU: recitation and tutorial conflict]


Return-Path: <dhermann@MIT.EDU>
From: dhermann@MIT.EDU
To: 6042-secretary@theory.lcs
Subject: recitation and tutorial conflict
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 1996 18:41:17 EST

due to a late scheduled class, I have a conflict with my recitation and
tutorial section.  I would like to change my recitation to F1 or F2, preferably
F1 and my tutorial to W12 or W1.

thanks,
daniel
262-2130



0, unseen,,
Summary-line: 12-Feb   kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu  #Re: [dhermann@MIT.EDU: recitation and tutorial conflict] 
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from eagle.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA05860; Mon, 12 Feb 96 20:04:58 EST
Received: from eagle.lcs.mit.edu by eagle.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA15827; Mon, 12 Feb 96 20:02:59 EST
Message-Id: <199602130102.AA15827@eagle.lcs.mit.edu>
To: dhermann@mit.edu
Cc: 6042-tas
Subject: Re: [dhermann@MIT.EDU: recitation and tutorial conflict] 
X-Mailer: exmh version 1.3gamma 3/18/94
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 96 20:02:58 -0500
From: kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu


Daniel,

> 
> due to a late scheduled class, I have a conflict with my recitation and
> tutorial section.  I would like to change my recitation to F1 or F2, 
preferably
> F1 and my tutorial to W12 or W1.
> 
> thanks,
> daniel
> 262-2130
> 

You can come to recitations, Fridays at 1pm in 34-301 and to tutorials 
Wednesdays at 12pm in 24-316.

--Jakov



0, unseen,,
Summary-line: 12-Feb   kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu  #Re: [dhermann@MIT.EDU: recitation and tutorial conflict] 
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from eagle.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA06574; Mon, 12 Feb 96 20:56:05 EST
Received: from eagle.lcs.mit.edu by eagle.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA15869; Mon, 12 Feb 96 20:54:07 EST
Message-Id: <199602130154.AA15869@eagle.lcs.mit.edu>
To: dhermann@MIT.EDU
Cc: 6042-tas
Subject: Re: [dhermann@MIT.EDU: recitation and tutorial conflict] 
In-Reply-To: Your message of Mon, 12 Feb 96 20:52:13 -0500.
             <9602130152.AA28209@pesto.MIT.EDU> 
X-Mailer: exmh version 1.3gamma 3/18/94
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 96 20:54:04 -0500
From: kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu


> Thanks for changing my recitation.  I mistakenly write W12 and W1 as 
> available - W1 and W2 are what I have open.  Could I attend one of those?
> 
> thanks,
> daniel

OK make it Wed's at 1pm in 24-316

--Jakov



0, unseen,,
Summary-line: 13-Feb  dmjones@theory.lcs.mit.ed  #[mdtanner@MIT.EDU: Please remove me]
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <dmjones@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from sandpiper.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA18679; Tue, 13 Feb 96 11:28:10 EST
From: dmjones@theory.lcs.mit.edu (David M. Jones)
Received: by sandpiper.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA25677; Tue, 13 Feb 96 11:28:40 EST
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 96 11:28:40 EST
Message-Id: <199602131628.AA25677@sandpiper.lcs.mit.edu>
To: 6042-tas
Subject: [mdtanner@MIT.EDU: Please remove me]


Return-Path: <mdtanner@MIT.EDU>
To: 6042-secretary@theory.lcs.mit.edu
Cc: mdtanner@MIT.EDU
From: Marc Tanner <mdtanner@MIT.EDU>
Subject: Please remove me
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 1996 01:23:39 EST
Sender: mdtanner@MIT.EDU

I will not be taking 6.042 this term.  Please remove me from the
mailing lists.  Thanks!

							--Marc



0, unseen,,
Summary-line: 13-Feb  dmjones@theory.lcs.mit.ed  #[bootes@MIT.EDU: dropped]
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <dmjones@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from sandpiper.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA18770; Tue, 13 Feb 96 11:30:02 EST
From: dmjones@theory.lcs.mit.edu (David M. Jones)
Received: by sandpiper.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA25687; Tue, 13 Feb 96 11:30:22 EST
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 96 11:30:22 EST
Message-Id: <199602131630.AA25687@sandpiper.lcs.mit.edu>
To: 6042-tas
Subject: [bootes@MIT.EDU: dropped]


Return-Path: <bootes@MIT.EDU>
To: 6042-secretary@theory.lcs.mit.edu
Subject: dropped
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 1996 08:15:35 EST
From: Sola C Grantham <bootes@MIT.EDU>
Content-Length: 113


Hi `, I have recently dropped 6.042, so please remove me from your 
e-mail list. 

Sola Grantham
bootes@mit.edu



0, unseen,,
Summary-line: 13-Feb   achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu  #
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from condor.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA19860; Tue, 13 Feb 96 12:09:02 EST
From: achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Andrew Chou)
Received: by condor.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA08012; Tue, 13 Feb 96 12:07:54 EST
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 96 12:07:54 EST
Message-Id: <199602131707.AA08012@condor.lcs.mit.edu>
To: 6042-tas

We have the following files to keep a record of what goes on.

Tutorials/tut1.notes  -- everyone's notes on what they thought of tutorial
                         Just write a few lines each week

Recitations/rec1.notes -- only those who did recitation need to fill this out
                          say what you covered and any other comments

TASKLOG	              -- division of labor schedule
                         include what handouts you did
				 tutorials you did
                                 recitations you did
                                 any other class related work
                         try to keep the entries brief

Ok.  Also, tut2.tex is ready in the Tutorials directory.

-- Andrew


0, unseen,,
Summary-line: 13-Feb   achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu  #
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from kiwi.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA27169; Tue, 13 Feb 96 17:23:43 EST
From: achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Andrew Chou)
Received: by kiwi.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA14695; Tue, 13 Feb 96 17:23:39 EST
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 96 17:23:39 EST
Message-Id: <199602132223.AA14695@kiwi.lcs.mit.edu>
To: 6042-tas

New version of tut2.tex is available.


0, unseen,,
Summary-line: 13-Feb   achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu  #information sheet.
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from condor.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA27397; Tue, 13 Feb 96 17:34:17 EST
From: achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Andrew Chou)
Received: by condor.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA08242; Tue, 13 Feb 96 17:33:09 EST
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 96 17:33:09 EST
Message-Id: <199602132233.AA08242@condor.lcs.mit.edu>
To: ktaylor@MIT.EDU
Cc: 6042-teachers
In-Reply-To: ktaylor@MIT.EDU's message of Tue, 13 Feb 1996 17:29:40 -0500 <9602132229.AA22339@m16-034-13.MIT.EDU>
Subject: information sheet.

Tutorial is in room 38-495 (at 10am).  Your recitation is
in 26-210.

-- Andrew


0, unseen,,
Summary-line: 13-Feb  rivest@theory.lcs.mit.edu  #Student Pictures by Subject
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <rivest@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from swan.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA27551; Tue, 13 Feb 96 17:41:19 EST
From: rivest@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Ron Rivest)
Received: by swan.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA13407; Tue, 13 Feb 96 17:41:18 EST
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 96 17:41:18 EST
Message-Id: <199602132241.AA13407@swan.lcs.mit.edu>
To: anneh@eecs.MIT.EDU
Cc: 6042-teachers
Subject: Student Pictures by Subject


Yes, please send us 6 sets of photos for 6.042...

	Thanks,
	Ron

==============================================================================
Return-Path: <anneh@eecs.MIT.EDU>
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 96 17:14:36 -0500
From: anneh@eecs.MIT.EDU (Anne Hunter)
To: eecs-faculty@mit.edu
Subject: Student Pictures by Subject
Reply-To: anneh@eecs.MIT.EDU


I can arrange for you to get a set or several sets of the students in
your class.  Not, I'm afraid, by recitation section.  Please email me
immediately if you'd like photos so that you receive them before
midterms.  There's no cost to the Department.

Thanks,


Anne Hunter



0, unseen,,
Summary-line: 15-Feb  rivest@theory.lcs.mit.edu  #Homework PS2
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <rivest@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from swan.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA03279; Thu, 15 Feb 96 10:09:38 EST
From: rivest@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Ron Rivest)
Received: by swan.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA14954; Thu, 15 Feb 96 10:09:36 EST
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 96 10:09:36 EST
Message-Id: <199602151509.AA14954@swan.lcs.mit.edu>
To: 6042-teachers
Subject: Homework PS2


What is the status of PS2?  Do we have something ready to go out??

	Cheers,
	Ron


0, unseen,,
Summary-line: 15-Feb   kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu  #Homework PS2 
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from nightingale.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA05757; Thu, 15 Feb 96 12:00:26 EST
Received: from nightingale.lcs.mit.edu by nightingale.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA24997; Thu, 15 Feb 96 11:59:07 EST
Message-Id: <199602151659.AA24997@nightingale.lcs.mit.edu>
X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.2 7/18/95
To: 6042-teachers
Subject: Homework PS2 
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 96 11:59:07 -0500
From: kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu


Ps 2 is ready. It's in the class directory as H05-Pset2.{tex,dvi}

Please let me know (by 1:30) if you notice any mistakes in it.

I'll make copies and bring it to class.

Thanks,
--Jakov

p.s. I assume this will be the only handout today.




0, unseen,,
Summary-line: 16-Feb   achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu  #PSets
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from kiwi.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA26908; Fri, 16 Feb 96 10:21:45 EST
From: achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Andrew Chou)
Received: by kiwi.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA15326; Fri, 16 Feb 96 10:21:36 EST
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 96 10:21:36 EST
Message-Id: <199602161521.AA15326@kiwi.lcs.mit.edu>
To: 6042-tas
Subject: PSets

For turning in PSets, put each recitation section into a envelope of
some kind, and bring it to my office.  Also, label the envelope with
the recitation time and room number.

I'm supposed to meet the graders around 4:30, so I need all the Psets
by then.

-- Andrew


0, unseen,,
Summary-line: 16-Feb          to: 6042-teachers  #ps1 soln
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from sparrow.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA27290; Fri, 16 Feb 96 10:43:19 EST
From: meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Albert R. Meyer)
Received: by sparrow.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA08070; Fri, 16 Feb 96 10:43:20 EST
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 96 10:43:20 EST
Message-Id: <199602161543.AA08070@sparrow.lcs.mit.edu>
To: 6042-teachers
Subject: ps1 soln

My revised version is in our working 6042 dirtectory H06-Soln1-meyer.tex.
I've corrected some typos, rewritten the solution to p7 to use STRUCTURAL
INDUCTION and condensed it to 4 pages by not recopying the ternary tree
picture.  I think it's ready for distribution.

PARRY: maybe give it one last proofread before you place it in the
homepage at 4pm today.

Regards, A.


0, unseen,,
Summary-line: 16-Feb  rivest@theory.lcs.mit.edu  #Graders for 6.042
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <rivest@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from swan.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA05239; Fri, 16 Feb 96 16:19:10 EST
From: rivest@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Ron Rivest)
Received: by swan.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA17319; Fri, 16 Feb 96 16:19:09 EST
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 96 16:19:09 EST
Message-Id: <199602162119.AA17319@swan.lcs.mit.edu>
To: achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu
Cc: 6042-teachers
Subject: Graders for 6.042


Yes, we've been upped to 40 hours/week..

	Ron

==============================================================================
Return-Path: <achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
From: achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Andrew Chou)
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 96 10:34:27 EST
To: rivest, meyer

Hi,

Did we get a final word on how many hours the graders get?  I'm meeting
with them today, and they need this information to sign up for pay.

-- Andrew



0, unseen,,
Summary-line: 16-Feb  miccianc@theory.lcs.mit.e  #tutorial 1, solns
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <miccianc@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from kingfisher.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA06295; Fri, 16 Feb 96 17:09:21 EST
From: miccianc@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Daniele Micciancio)
Received: by kingfisher.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA28964; Fri, 16 Feb 96 17:14:18 EST
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 96 17:14:18 EST
Message-Id: <199602162214.AA28964@kingfisher.lcs.mit.edu>
To: 6042-tas
Subject: tutorial 1, solns


Albert told me to make avaliable a 
written solution to the first problem of 
tutorial 1 (the tiling problem).
The solution is ready in the Tutorials directory
as tsoln1.{tex,ps}, but I cannot copy it on the
public FTP directory.
Does anyone know how to do that?

-- Daniele






0, unseen,,
Summary-line: 16-Feb        to: jones, 6042-tas  #[MAILER-DAEMON@theory.lcs.mit.edu: Returned mail: User unknown]
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from sparrow.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA08509; Fri, 16 Feb 96 19:33:16 EST
From: meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Albert R. Meyer)
Received: by sparrow.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA09167; Fri, 16 Feb 96 19:33:16 EST
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 96 19:33:16 EST
Message-Id: <199602170033.AA09167@sparrow.lcs.mit.edu>
To: jones, 6042-tas
Subject: [MAILER-DAEMON@theory.lcs.mit.edu: Returned mail: User unknown]

Date: Fri, 16 Feb 96 19:10:54 EST
From: MAILER-DAEMON@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Mail Delivery Subsystem)
Subject: Returned mail: User unknown
To: meyer@lcs.mit.edu

   ----- Transcript of session follows -----
550 /a/class/6.042/spring96/archive-6042-tas... Can't create output
550 /a/class/6.042/spring96/archive-6042-tas... Can't create output
550 /a/class/6.042/spring96/archive-6042-lecturers... Can't create output
550 /a/class/6.042/spring96/archive-6042-tas... Can't create output
550 /a/class/6.042/spring96/archive-6042-lecturers... Can't create output
While talking to SOUTH-STATION-ANNEX.MIT.EDU:
>>> RCPT To:<pkamyvyss@mit.edu>
<<< 550 <pkamyvyss@mit.edu>... User unknown: Bad file number
550 pkamyvyss@mit.edu... User unknown

   ----- Unsent message follows -----
Return-Path: <meyer@lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from MIT.EDU (PACIFIC-CARRIER-ANNEX.MIT.EDU) by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA08194; Fri, 16 Feb 96 19:10:54 EST
Received: from MIT.MIT.EDU by MIT.EDU with SMTP
	id AA26024; Fri, 16 Feb 96 19:10:26 EST
Received: from slip-meyer.lcs.mit.edu by MIT.MIT.EDU (5.61/4.7) id AA27963; Fri, 16 Feb 96 19:10:50 EST
Message-Id: <3124D6D6.9F1@lcs.mit.edu>
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 1996 19:11:18 +0000
From: "Albert R. Meyer" <meyer@lcs.mit.edu>
Organization: MIT Lab. for CS
X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.0 (Macintosh; I; 68K)
Mime-Version: 1.0
To: 6042-forum@theory.lcs.mit.edu
Subject: solution to PS1
X-Url: ftp://theory.lcs.mit.edu/pub/classes/6.042/homepage.html
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

The solution to Problem Set 1 is now available 
through the course WWW page:

ftp://theory.lcs.mit.edu/pub/classes/6.042/homepage.h
tml



0, unseen,,
Summary-line: 20-Feb  miccianc@theory.lcs.mit.e  #tutorial 3
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <miccianc@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from kingfisher.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA06141; Tue, 20 Feb 96 14:18:07 EST
From: miccianc@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Daniele Micciancio)
Received: by kingfisher.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA02926; Tue, 20 Feb 96 14:23:08 EST
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 96 14:23:08 EST
Message-Id: <199602201923.AA02926@kingfisher.lcs.mit.edu>
To: 6042-teachers
Subject: tutorial 3


Tutorial 3 is ready in the Tutorials directory (tut3.{tex,dvi,ps}).


-- Daniele



0, unseen,,
Summary-line: 20-Feb   kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu  #Re: tutorial 3 
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from dove.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA06524; Tue, 20 Feb 96 14:32:50 EST
Received: from dove.lcs.mit.edu by dove.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA12033; Tue, 20 Feb 96 14:34:42 EST
Message-Id: <199602201934.AA12033@dove.lcs.mit.edu>
X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.2 7/18/95
To: miccianc@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Daniele Micciancio)
Cc: 6042-teachers
Subject: Re: tutorial 3 
In-Reply-To: Your message of Tue, 20 Feb 96 14:23:08 -0500.
             <199602201923.AA02926@kingfisher.lcs.mit.edu> 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 96 14:34:41 -0500
From: kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu


> 
> Tutorial 3 is ready in the Tutorials directory (tut3.{tex,dvi,ps}).
> 
> 
> -- Daniele
> 

The way problem 1 is stated, is too similar to problem 4 on ps #2. (It is 
identical, except in ps#2 they are asked to use Chinese Remainder Thm.)

I thought the problem was to show if

	a | c and b | c and gcd(a,b)=1
then
	ab | c

Then use above to show what you have written.

--Jakov



0, unseen,,
Summary-line: 20-Feb  miccianc@theory.lcs.mit.e  #psoln2 and tut3
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <miccianc@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from kingfisher.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA11747; Tue, 20 Feb 96 18:25:12 EST
From: miccianc@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Daniele Micciancio)
Received: by kingfisher.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA03504; Tue, 20 Feb 96 18:30:14 EST
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 96 18:30:14 EST
Message-Id: <199602202330.AA03504@kingfisher.lcs.mit.edu>
To: 6042-teachers
Subject: psoln2 and tut3


Solutions to problem set 2 are now complete.
Tutorial 3 has been modified.

Daniele.



1,,
Summary-line: 20-Feb          to: 6042-teachers  #tut3, ps2 sol'n
Return-Path: <meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from dove.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA14694; Tue, 20 Feb 96 22:40:28 EST
From: meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Albert R. Meyer)
Received: by dove.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA12899; Tue, 20 Feb 96 22:42:20 EST
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 96 22:42:20 EST
Message-Id: <199602210342.AA12899@dove.lcs.mit.edu>
To: 6042-teachers
Subject: tut3, ps2 sol'n

*** EOOH ***
From: meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Albert R. Meyer)
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 96 22:42:20 EST
To: 6042-teachers
Subject: tut3, ps2 sol'n

Edited version of tut3 problems is in Tutorials/tut3-meyer.{tex}{ps}

Sol'n to ps2 looks ok; suggest indicating a second proof of cancellation
law mod p:  it follows from the zero-divisor property:

   if kj = lj, then k(j-l) = kj-lj = 0.  Now if j =/= 0 and zero-divisor
   property holds, then j-l=0, so j=l.

Regards, A.


1,,
Summary-line: 21-Feb  dmjones@theory.lcs.mit.ed  #[mitch@au-bon-pain.lcs.mit.edu: Textbooks]
Return-Path: <dmjones@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from sandpiper.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA29197; Wed, 21 Feb 96 14:15:32 EST
From: dmjones@theory.lcs.mit.edu (David M. Jones)
Received: by sandpiper.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA29267; Wed, 21 Feb 96 14:16:04 EST
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 96 14:16:04 EST
Message-Id: <199602211916.AA29267@sandpiper.lcs.mit.edu>
To: 6042-teachers
Subject: [mitch@au-bon-pain.lcs.mit.edu: Textbooks]

*** EOOH ***
From: dmjones@theory.lcs.mit.edu (David M. Jones)
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 96 14:16:04 EST
To: 6042-teachers
Subject: [mitch@au-bon-pain.lcs.mit.edu: Textbooks]


Return-Path: <mitch@au-bon-pain.lcs.mit.edu>
To: help-teach@hq.lcs.mit.edu
Subject: Textbooks
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 1996 14:13:00 -0500
From: Mitch Mitchell <mitch@au-bon-pain.lcs.mit.edu>


This is the message for those of you that are course secretaries this
semester.  I spoke with the MIT Coop, and they informed me that due to
their renovation schedule being moved up, they will be returning texts
in the next two weeks.  This means that the students in your courses
should purchase the text soon if they plan to do so at all.  Please make
sure that the TAs are also aware of this so that they can warn the
students.

Mitch



1,,
Summary-line: 21-Feb   kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu  #Re: tutorial 1 
Return-Path: <kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from dove.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA29530; Wed, 21 Feb 96 14:32:31 EST
Received: from dove.lcs.mit.edu by dove.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA13895; Wed, 21 Feb 96 14:34:23 EST
Message-Id: <199602211934.AA13895@dove.lcs.mit.edu>
X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.2 7/18/95
To: Timothy Chien <tchien@MIT.EDU>
Cc: 6042-teachers
Subject: Re: tutorial 1 
In-Reply-To: Your message of Wed, 21 Feb 96 12:32:20 -0500.
             <9602211732.AA27912@m38-370-17.MIT.EDU> 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 96 14:34:23 -0500
From: kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu

*** EOOH ***
X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.2 7/18/95
To: Timothy Chien <tchien@MIT.EDU>
Cc: 6042-teachers
Subject: Re: tutorial 1 
In-Reply-To: Your message of Wed, 21 Feb 96 12:32:20 -0500.
             <9602211732.AA27912@m38-370-17.MIT.EDU> 
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 96 14:34:23 -0500
From: kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu

> hi,
> 
> i added 6.042 friday, feb. 9, so i did not attend tutorial 1.  if it's 
> possible that i won't be penalized for this, that would be great..thanks..
> 
> 
> 
> --tim
> 

There will be no penalty for that.
--Jakov



1,,
Summary-line: 21-Feb  miccianc@theory.lcs.mit.e  #
Return-Path: <miccianc@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from kingfisher.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA05303; Wed, 21 Feb 96 19:05:41 EST
From: miccianc@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Daniele Micciancio)
Received: by kingfisher.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA06231; Wed, 21 Feb 96 19:10:44 EST
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 96 19:10:44 EST
Message-Id: <199602220010.AA06231@kingfisher.lcs.mit.edu>
To: 6042-teachers

*** EOOH ***
From: miccianc@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Daniele Micciancio)
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 96 19:10:44 EST
To: 6042-teachers



Psolns2 modified as suggested by albert.

Daniele



1,,
Summary-line: 21-Feb          to: 6042-teachers  #tutorials
Return-Path: <meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from sparrow.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA07503; Wed, 21 Feb 96 21:59:39 EST
From: meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Albert R. Meyer)
Received: by sparrow.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA11573; Wed, 21 Feb 96 21:59:40 EST
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 96 21:59:40 EST
Message-Id: <199602220259.AA11573@sparrow.lcs.mit.edu>
To: 6042-teachers
Subject: tutorials

*** EOOH ***
From: meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Albert R. Meyer)
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 96 21:59:40 EST
To: 6042-teachers
Subject: tutorials

How did they go?  problems too hard...easy?

Regards, A.


1,,
Summary-line: 21-Feb                  to: jones  #[MAILER-DAEMON@theory.lcs.mit.edu: Returned mail: User unknown]
Return-Path: <meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from sparrow.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA07680; Wed, 21 Feb 96 22:11:44 EST
From: meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Albert R. Meyer)
Received: by sparrow.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA11603; Wed, 21 Feb 96 22:11:45 EST
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 96 22:11:45 EST
Message-Id: <199602220311.AA11603@sparrow.lcs.mit.edu>
To: jones
Cc: 6042-teachers
Subject: [MAILER-DAEMON@theory.lcs.mit.edu: Returned mail: User unknown]

*** EOOH ***
From: meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Albert R. Meyer)
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 96 22:11:45 EST
To: jones
Cc: 6042-teachers
Subject: [MAILER-DAEMON@theory.lcs.mit.edu: Returned mail: User unknown]

YOU MAY IGNORE THIS.  THIS IS A TEST TO SEE IF I MANAGED TO FIX THE
FOLLOWING PROBLEM:

Date: Wed, 21 Feb 96 22:04:08 EST
From: MAILER-DAEMON@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Mail Delivery Subsystem)
Subject: Returned mail: User unknown
To: meyer

   ----- Transcript of session follows -----
550 /a/class/6.042/spring96/archive-6042-tas... Can't create output
550 /a/class/6.042/spring96/archive-6042-tas... Can't create output
550 /a/class/6.042/spring96/archive-6042-lecturers... Can't create output
550 /a/class/6.042/spring96/archive-6042-tas... Can't create output
550 /a/class/6.042/spring96/archive-6042-lecturers... Can't create output
While talking to SOUTH-STATION-ANNEX.MIT.EDU:
>>> RCPT To:<pkamyvyss@mit.edu>
<<< 550 <pkamyvyss@mit.edu>... User unknown: Bad file number
550 pkamyvyss@mit.edu... User unknown

   ----- Unsent message follows -----
Return-Path: <meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from sparrow.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA07552; Wed, 21 Feb 96 22:04:08 EST
From: meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Albert R. Meyer)
Received: by sparrow.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA11576; Wed, 21 Feb 96 22:04:09 EST
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 96 22:04:09 EST
Message-Id: <199602220304.AA11576@sparrow.lcs.mit.edu>
To: 6042-forum
Subject: Textbooks

Subject: Textbooks
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 1996 14:13:00 -0500
From: Mitch Mitchell <mitch@au-bon-pain.lcs.mit.edu>

... I spoke with the MIT Coop, and they informed me that due to their
renovation schedule being moved up, they will be returning texts in the
next two weeks.  This means that the students ... should purchase the
{course} text soon if they plan to do so at all. ...

Mitch





1,,
Summary-line: 21-Feb               to: 6042-tas  #Handout 7, Notes on Equations
Return-Path: <meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from sparrow.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA08308; Wed, 21 Feb 96 23:14:06 EST
From: meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Albert R. Meyer)
Received: by sparrow.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA11714; Wed, 21 Feb 96 23:14:08 EST
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 96 23:14:08 EST
Message-Id: <199602220414.AA11714@sparrow.lcs.mit.edu>
To: 6042-tas
Subject: Handout 7, Notes on Equations

*** EOOH ***
From: meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Albert R. Meyer)
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 96 23:14:08 EST
To: 6042-tas
Subject: Handout 7, Notes on Equations

This is ready for copying and distribution.  Printout is in the printer in
David Jones' office.  The source and ps files are in the course FTP
directory with links from the course homepage.

Will one of you see to getting copies made and brought to class?

Thanks, A.


1,,
Summary-line: 22-Feb  slbolan@MIT.EDU (ShawnBol  #dropping 6.042
Return-Path: <slbolan@MIT.EDU>
Received: from MIT.EDU (PACIFIC-CARRIER-ANNEX.MIT.EDU) by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA15008; Thu, 22 Feb 96 07:59:52 EST
Received: from MIT.MIT.EDU by MIT.EDU with SMTP
	id AA07228; Thu, 22 Feb 96 07:59:21 EST
Received: from PRODIGY-MACG.MIT.EDU by MIT.MIT.EDU (5.61/4.7) id AA00480; Thu, 22 Feb 96 07:59:50 EST
Message-Id: <9602221259.AA00480@MIT.MIT.EDU>
To: 6042-tas@theory.lcs.mit.edu
Subject: dropping 6.042
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 96 07:59:50
From: slbolan@MIT.EDU (Shawn "Doc" Bolan )

*** EOOH ***
To: 6042-tas@theory.lcs.mit.edu
Subject: dropping 6.042
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 96 07:59:50
From: slbolan@MIT.EDU (Shawn "Doc" Bolan )

I am signed up for 6.042J in Jakov's section, but have decided not to take 
the class this term.

- Shawn Bolan



1,,
Summary-line: 22-Feb   kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu  #Re: tutorials 
Return-Path: <kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from dove.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA17893; Thu, 22 Feb 96 10:54:24 EST
Received: from dove.lcs.mit.edu by dove.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA15490; Thu, 22 Feb 96 10:56:18 EST
Message-Id: <199602221556.AA15490@dove.lcs.mit.edu>
X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.2 7/18/95
To: meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Albert R. Meyer)
Cc: 6042-teachers
Subject: Re: tutorials 
In-Reply-To: Your message of Wed, 21 Feb 96 21:59:40 -0500.
             <199602220259.AA11573@sparrow.lcs.mit.edu> 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 96 10:56:17 -0500
From: kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu

*** EOOH ***
X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.2 7/18/95
To: meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Albert R. Meyer)
Cc: 6042-teachers
Subject: Re: tutorials 
In-Reply-To: Your message of Wed, 21 Feb 96 21:59:40 -0500.
             <199602220259.AA11573@sparrow.lcs.mit.edu> 
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 96 10:56:17 -0500
From: kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu


The first problem (on divisibility) seemed too easy, but the second one 
(casting out nines) was about right.

--Jakov



1,,
Summary-line: 22-Feb   kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu  #Re: Handout 7, Notes on Equations 
Return-Path: <kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from dove.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA17926; Thu, 22 Feb 96 10:57:21 EST
Received: from dove.lcs.mit.edu by dove.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA15501; Thu, 22 Feb 96 10:59:15 EST
Message-Id: <199602221559.AA15501@dove.lcs.mit.edu>
X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.2 7/18/95
To: meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Albert R. Meyer)
Cc: 6042-tas
Subject: Re: Handout 7, Notes on Equations 
In-Reply-To: Your message of Wed, 21 Feb 96 23:14:08 -0500.
             <199602220414.AA11714@sparrow.lcs.mit.edu> 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 96 10:59:14 -0500
From: kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu

*** EOOH ***
X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.2 7/18/95
To: meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Albert R. Meyer)
Cc: 6042-tas
Subject: Re: Handout 7, Notes on Equations 
In-Reply-To: Your message of Wed, 21 Feb 96 23:14:08 -0500.
             <199602220414.AA11714@sparrow.lcs.mit.edu> 
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 96 10:59:14 -0500
From: kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu

> This is ready for copying and distribution.  Printout is in the printer in
> David Jones' office.  The source and ps files are in the course FTP
> directory with links from the course homepage.
> 
> Will one of you see to getting copies made and brought to class?
> 
> Thanks, A.

i'll make the copies,

--jakov



1,,
Summary-line: 23-Feb   achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu  #TASKLOG
Return-Path: <achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from swan.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA18376; Fri, 23 Feb 96 18:34:55 EST
From: achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Andrew Chou)
Received: by swan.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA22341; Fri, 23 Feb 96 18:34:53 EST
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 96 18:34:53 EST
Message-Id: <199602232334.AA22341@swan.lcs.mit.edu>
To: 6042-tas
Cc: 6042-lecturers
Subject: TASKLOG

*** EOOH ***
From: achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Andrew Chou)
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 96 18:34:53 EST
To: 6042-tas
Cc: 6042-lecturers
Subject: TASKLOG

Hi everyone,

So, Albert wanted us to modify the TASKLOG format.  I suggest we put
at the top of the file a current projects list.  This tells us what
everyone is currently working on.  The rest of the file can stay in
its current format.  Once, you complete a task, put it under your
name.

-- Andrew


1,,
Summary-line: 25-Feb   achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu  #Ps3 solns
Return-Path: <achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from swan.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA11524; Sun, 25 Feb 96 09:55:07 EST
From: achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Andrew Chou)
Received: by swan.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA23260; Sun, 25 Feb 96 09:55:06 EST
Date: Sun, 25 Feb 96 09:55:06 EST
Message-Id: <199602251455.AA23260@swan.lcs.mit.edu>
To: 6042-teachers
Subject: Ps3 solns

*** EOOH ***
From: achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Andrew Chou)
Date: Sun, 25 Feb 96 09:55:06 EST
To: 6042-teachers
Subject: Ps3 solns

PS3 solns are available for debugging.

-- Andrew


1,,
Summary-line: 27-Feb   achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu  #
Return-Path: <achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from kingfisher.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA22005; Tue, 27 Feb 96 12:36:38 EST
From: achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Andrew Chou)
Received: by kingfisher.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA22112; Tue, 27 Feb 96 12:41:49 EST
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 96 12:41:49 EST
Message-Id: <199602271741.AA22112@kingfisher.lcs.mit.edu>
To: 6042-tas

*** EOOH ***
From: achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Andrew Chou)
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 96 12:41:49 EST
To: 6042-tas

For tutorial, I like 1 and 3.  I'll type them in.

-- Andrew


1,,
Summary-line: 27-Feb   achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu  #
Return-Path: <achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from kingfisher.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA22458; Tue, 27 Feb 96 13:00:40 EST
From: achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Andrew Chou)
Received: by kingfisher.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA22228; Tue, 27 Feb 96 13:05:51 EST
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 96 13:05:51 EST
Message-Id: <199602271805.AA22228@kingfisher.lcs.mit.edu>
To: 6042-teachers

*** EOOH ***
From: achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Andrew Chou)
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 96 13:05:51 EST
To: 6042-teachers

Problems for Tutorial 4 are ready.

-- Andrew


1,,
Summary-line: 27-Feb   achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu  #
Return-Path: <achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from kingfisher.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA23466; Tue, 27 Feb 96 13:46:04 EST
From: achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Andrew Chou)
Received: by kingfisher.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA22374; Tue, 27 Feb 96 13:51:15 EST
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 96 13:51:15 EST
Message-Id: <199602271851.AA22374@kingfisher.lcs.mit.edu>
To: 6042-tas

*** EOOH ***
From: achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Andrew Chou)
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 96 13:51:15 EST
To: 6042-tas

My two problem suggestions:

1)
A binary tree is defined as follows.
1) A single node is a binary tree.
2) If $T_1$ and $T_2$ are binary trees, then
           n 
          / \
	T_1 T_2
is a binary tree.

For each leaf, assign it weight $2^{-d}$ where
$d$ is the depth of the leaf.
The depth of leaf is the length of the shortest path from the root
to the leaf.

Let $S$ denote the set of leaves.
Prove
that 
\[
\sum_{l \in S} w(l) = 1.
\]

2)
Define the L=lcm (a,b) to the least number such a|L and b|L
Prove
lcm (a,b) = \frac{ab}{\gcd(a,b)}




1,,
Summary-line: 27-Feb   kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu  #Re: Joining 6.042 
Return-Path: <kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from sparrow.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA29152; Tue, 27 Feb 96 17:54:44 EST
Received: from sparrow.lcs.mit.edu by sparrow.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA13558; Tue, 27 Feb 96 17:54:47 EST
Message-Id: <199602272254.AA13558@sparrow.lcs.mit.edu>
X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.2 7/18/95
To: Jack Nye <jnye@MIT.EDU>
Cc: 6042-tas@theory.lcs.mit.edu
Subject: Re: Joining 6.042 
In-Reply-To: Your message of Tue, 27 Feb 96 17:08:05 -0500.
             <313380C5.4EAB@mit.edu> 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 96 17:54:46 -0500
From: kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu

*** EOOH ***
X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.2 7/18/95
To: Jack Nye <jnye@MIT.EDU>
Cc: 6042-tas@theory.lcs.mit.edu
Subject: Re: Joining 6.042 
In-Reply-To: Your message of Tue, 27 Feb 96 17:08:05 -0500.
             <313380C5.4EAB@mit.edu> 
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 96 17:54:46 -0500
From: kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu

> I joined 6.042 today, and Prof. Meyer said I should
> write this address to get a Tutorial/Recitation
> assignment as soon as possible.
> 
> I am free any time after noon on Wednessdays and Fridays.
> 
> Thank you,
> Jack Nye
> <jnye@mit.edu>

you can come to Wed 4pm tutorial in 24-316
and to recitation on Fridays 2-3 in 34-301

--Jakov



1,,
Summary-line: 27-Feb  to: achou@theory.lcs.mit.  #tut4-meyer
Return-Path: <meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from stork.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA29364; Tue, 27 Feb 96 18:03:23 EST
From: meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Albert R. Meyer)
Received: by stork.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA01889; Tue, 27 Feb 96 18:04:15 EST
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 96 18:04:15 EST
Message-Id: <199602272304.AA01889@stork.lcs.mit.edu>
To: achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu
In-Reply-To: Andrew Chou's message of Tue, 27 Feb 96 13:05:51 EST <199602271805.AA22228@kingfisher.lcs.mit.edu>
Cc: 6042-teachers
Subject: tut4-meyer

*** EOOH ***
From: meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Albert R. Meyer)
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 96 18:04:15 EST
To: achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu
In-Reply-To: Andrew Chou's message of Tue, 27 Feb 96 13:05:51 EST <199602271805.AA22228@kingfisher.lcs.mit.edu>
Cc: 6042-teachers
Subject: tut4-meyer

   From: achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Andrew Chou)
   Date: Tue, 27 Feb 96 13:05:51 EST

   Problems for Tutorial 4 are ready.

   -- Andrew

My proposed revisions in tut4-meyer.tex.

Regards, A.


1,,
Summary-line: 27-Feb          to: 6042-teachers  #tut4-meyer-later.tex
Return-Path: <meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from stork.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA29803; Tue, 27 Feb 96 18:23:06 EST
From: meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Albert R. Meyer)
Received: by stork.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA01982; Tue, 27 Feb 96 18:23:58 EST
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 96 18:23:58 EST
Message-Id: <199602272323.AA01982@stork.lcs.mit.edu>
To: 6042-teachers
Subject: tut4-meyer-later.tex

*** EOOH ***
From: meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Albert R. Meyer)
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 96 18:23:58 EST
To: 6042-teachers
Subject: tut4-meyer-later.tex

I've corrected tu4-meyer into into tut4-meyer-later.tex.

ANDREW: let's use Handout format for tutorial problems and put them on the
homepage right after weekly tutorials are completed.  Start with this one
and include the previous 3 when you get a chance.

Thanks, A.


1,,
Summary-line: 27-Feb               to: miccianc  #Tutorial protection
Return-Path: <meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from stork.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA29833; Tue, 27 Feb 96 18:25:26 EST
From: meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Albert R. Meyer)
Received: by stork.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA01987; Tue, 27 Feb 96 18:26:18 EST
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 96 18:26:18 EST
Message-Id: <199602272326.AA01987@stork.lcs.mit.edu>
To: miccianc
Cc: 6042-teachers
Subject: Tutorial protection

*** EOOH ***
From: meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Albert R. Meyer)
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 96 18:26:18 EST
To: miccianc
Cc: 6042-teachers
Subject: Tutorial protection

please

chmod o-rwx

Thanks, A.


1,,
Summary-line: 27-Feb  to: achou@theory.lcs.mit.  #6.042 quiz
Return-Path: <meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from stork.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA29880; Tue, 27 Feb 96 18:29:36 EST
From: meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Albert R. Meyer)
Received: by stork.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA01990; Tue, 27 Feb 96 18:30:28 EST
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 96 18:30:28 EST
Message-Id: <199602272330.AA01990@stork.lcs.mit.edu>
To: achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu
In-Reply-To: Andrew Chou's message of Tue, 27 Feb 96 13:53:26 EST <199602271853.AA22383@kingfisher.lcs.mit.edu>
Subject: 6.042 quiz
Cc: 6042-teachers

*** EOOH ***
From: meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Albert R. Meyer)
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 96 18:30:28 EST
To: achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu
In-Reply-To: Andrew Chou's message of Tue, 27 Feb 96 13:53:26 EST <199602271853.AA22383@kingfisher.lcs.mit.edu>
Subject: 6.042 quiz
Cc: 6042-teachers

   From: achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Andrew Chou)
   Date: Tue, 27 Feb 96 13:53:26 EST

   Return-Path: <achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
   From: achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Andrew Chou)
   Date: Tue, 27 Feb 96 13:51:15 EST
   To: 6042-tas

   My two problem suggestions:

Great problems, poor security: better not use email for quiz probs.
Suggest we henceforth stick them in our course working directory,
ENCRYPTED with a course keyword we agree on (not by email :-) ).

Thanks, A.


0, unseen,,
Summary-line: 28-Feb  to: achou@theory.lcs.mit.  #Multiple file versions
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from dove.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA11810; Wed, 28 Feb 96 11:06:39 EST
From: meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Albert R. Meyer)
Received: by dove.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA22028; Wed, 28 Feb 96 11:08:38 EST
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 96 11:08:38 EST
Message-Id: <199602281608.AA22028@dove.lcs.mit.edu>
To: achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu
In-Reply-To: Andrew Chou's message of Tue, 27 Feb 96 18:47:48 EST <199602272347.AA23062@kingfisher.lcs.mit.edu>
Subject: Multiple file versions
Cc: 6042-teachers

   From: achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Andrew Chou)
   Date: Tue, 27 Feb 96 18:47:48 EST

   Albert,

   I think it might be easier if we just kept one copy of each file
   (instead of having many versions).  It gets confusing which is the
   current version.  Also, I fixed a typo in tut4-meyer.tex, but it
   didn't get carried over to tut4-meyer-later.tex.

   -- Andrew

I created new file when I saw you were already editing the old one.

Maintaining only one file creates other confusions, viz, who made what
changes, and who is final arbitor of conflicting changes?  It seems
better for one person to be in charge of the master copy; everyone else
may copy the master into their own file which they edit and then make
available to the person in charge.  I considered you to be in charge of
tut4.tex, so I put my revisions in another file.

I'd be pleased to hear of more effective ways to coordinate our handout
editing.  (There is commercial software which does version control to help
support collaborative document writing, but we don't have it.)

Regards, A.


0, unseen,,
Summary-line: 28-Feb   kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu  #tutorial 4 
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from sparrow.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA12282; Wed, 28 Feb 96 11:23:38 EST
Received: from sparrow.lcs.mit.edu by sparrow.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA14223; Wed, 28 Feb 96 11:23:41 EST
Message-Id: <199602281623.AA14223@sparrow.lcs.mit.edu>
X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.2 7/18/95
To: 6042-teachers
Subject: tutorial 4 
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 96 11:23:41 -0500
From: kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu


there were 2 typos in the latest version

in problem 2, ... for 1 <= i <= n should be 1 <= i <= k

and in problem 2 part 1, N^2 should be N^k

--Jakov



0, unseen,,
Summary-line: 28-Feb          to: 6042-teachers  #tut4-final.tex
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from dove.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA12710; Wed, 28 Feb 96 11:52:56 EST
From: meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Albert R. Meyer)
Received: by dove.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA22119; Wed, 28 Feb 96 11:54:55 EST
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 96 11:54:55 EST
Message-Id: <199602281654.AA22119@dove.lcs.mit.edu>
To: 6042-teachers
Subject: tut4-final.tex

I've slightly undone  one  of Jakov's corrections--I wanted prob 2, part 1
to  have k=2.   I've  also changed  another couple  of  words.   My  final
version, which  I've  made handout 10,  is  is the Tutorial directory  and
printed out at printer in my office.

Regards, A.


0, unseen,,
Summary-line: 28-Feb  rivest@theory.lcs.mit.edu  #Version control
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <rivest@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from swan.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA12925; Wed, 28 Feb 96 11:59:40 EST
From: rivest@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Ron Rivest)
Received: by swan.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA25205; Wed, 28 Feb 96 11:59:39 EST
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 96 11:59:39 EST
Message-Id: <199602281659.AA25205@swan.lcs.mit.edu>
To: 6042-teachers
Subject: Version control


We do have a version control system here (CVS), which we are using for
the algorithms text.  I DON'T recommend using it here.

Let me propose the following simple scheme, which I use with co-authors:

Each file contains a first line of the form:

%% 2/29/96 Editing token is with NULL (editor's last name or NULL)

Change the first line before editing, and set it back to NULL when you are
done.  

	Cheers,
	Ron
==============================================================================
Return-Path: <meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
From: meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Albert R. Meyer)
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 96 11:08:38 EST
To: achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu
In-Reply-To: Andrew Chou's message of Tue, 27 Feb 96 18:47:48 EST <199602272347.AA23062@kingfisher.lcs.mit.edu>
Subject: Multiple file versions
Cc: 6042-teachers

   From: achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Andrew Chou)
   Date: Tue, 27 Feb 96 18:47:48 EST

   Albert,

   I think it might be easier if we just kept one copy of each file
   (instead of having many versions).  It gets confusing which is the
   current version.  Also, I fixed a typo in tut4-meyer.tex, but it
   didn't get carried over to tut4-meyer-later.tex.

   -- Andrew

I created new file when I saw you were already editing the old one.

Maintaining only one file creates other confusions, viz, who made what
changes, and who is final arbitor of conflicting changes?  It seems
better for one person to be in charge of the master copy; everyone else
may copy the master into their own file which they edit and then make
available to the person in charge.  I considered you to be in charge of
tut4.tex, so I put my revisions in another file.

I'd be pleased to hear of more effective ways to coordinate our handout
editing.  (There is commercial software which does version control to help
support collaborative document writing, but we don't have it.)

Regards, A.



0, unseen,,
Summary-line: 28-Feb  dmjones@theory.lcs.mit.ed  #Version control
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <dmjones@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from sandpiper.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA13736; Wed, 28 Feb 96 12:32:07 EST
From: dmjones@theory.lcs.mit.edu (David M. Jones)
Received: by sandpiper.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA02225; Wed, 28 Feb 96 12:32:43 EST
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 96 12:32:43 EST
Message-Id: <199602281732.AA02225@sandpiper.lcs.mit.edu>
To: 6042-teachers
In-Reply-To: Ron Rivest's message of Wed, 28 Feb 96 11:59:39 EST <199602281659.AA25205@swan.lcs.mit.edu>
Subject: Version control


> From: rivest@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Ron Rivest)
> Date: Wed, 28 Feb 96 11:59:39 EST
> 
> 
> We do have a version control system here (CVS), which we are using for
> the algorithms text.  I DON'T recommend using it here.
> 
> Let me propose the following simple scheme, which I use with co-authors:
> 
> Each file contains a first line of the form:
> 
> %% 2/29/96 Editing token is with NULL (editor's last name or NULL)
> 
> Change the first line before editing, and set it back to NULL when you are
> done.

Alternatively, you might try putting the following at the end of the
files you want to lock:

% Keep these lines at the end of the file!
% Local Variables:
% eval: (require 'journal-lock)
% eval: (if (buffer-file-name) (journal-lock-file (buffer-file-name)))
% End:

This provides a simple file-locking based on changing permissions,
i.e., when you start editing a file, the permissions are changed so
that only you have write permission.  If someone else tries to edit
the file, they'll get a warning that the file is already locked.  When
you finish editing and kill the buffer, the permissions revert to what
they were before.

I can't guarantee that it's immune to race conditions and it's prone
to leaving the file locked if your emacs session ends abnormally
(e.g., because of a system crash), but otherwise it seems to work
pretty well.

David.


0, unseen,,
Summary-line: 28-Feb  miccianc@theory.lcs.mit.e  #Re: tut4-final.tex
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <miccianc@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from kingfisher.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA15202; Wed, 28 Feb 96 13:41:16 EST
From: miccianc@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Daniele Micciancio)
Received: by kingfisher.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA25277; Wed, 28 Feb 96 13:46:28 EST
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 96 13:46:28 EST
Message-Id: <199602281846.AA25277@kingfisher.lcs.mit.edu>
To: 6042-teachers
In-Reply-To: <199602281654.AA22119@dove.lcs.mit.edu> (meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu)
Subject: Re: tut4-final.tex


In tutorial 4, problem 2 part 2.
A non-decreasing subsequence is not necessarily
increasing (we are in a partial order).
Maybe the word "non-decreasing" should be replaced 
by "(non necessarily strictly) increasing".

Daniele








0, unseen,,
Summary-line: 28-Feb   achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu  #
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from kingfisher.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA20363; Wed, 28 Feb 96 17:26:08 EST
From: achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Andrew Chou)
Received: by kingfisher.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA25990; Wed, 28 Feb 96 17:31:21 EST
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 96 17:31:21 EST
Message-Id: <199602282231.AA25990@kingfisher.lcs.mit.edu>
To: 6042-teachers

Hi Albert/Ron, 

Someone asked me about the final.  It's not currently listed in
the finals schedule.  Is there any new information about its
scheduling?

-- Andrew


0, unseen,,
Summary-line: 28-Feb  miccianc@theory.lcs.mit.e  #quiz1
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <miccianc@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from kingfisher.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA21767; Wed, 28 Feb 96 18:38:05 EST
From: miccianc@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Daniele Micciancio)
Received: by kingfisher.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA26243; Wed, 28 Feb 96 18:43:18 EST
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 96 18:43:18 EST
Message-Id: <199602282343.AA26243@kingfisher.lcs.mit.edu>
To: 6042-teachers
Subject: quiz1


I wrote two versions of the problem on 
equivalence relations ( one with the lub operation 
and the other one without it).
They can be found in Quiz1/q.dan.tex.
The file is encrypted using krypt.
To decrypt just run krypt again on the file.

q.dan.tex looks for the course-macro file
in the directory "spring96/". You will have to 
modify the path as appropriate to run latex.

Daniele





1,,
Summary-line: 28-Feb        to: banerji@MIT.EDU  #Final
Return-Path: <meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from sparrow.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA23032; Wed, 28 Feb 96 20:24:50 EST
From: meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Albert R. Meyer)
Received: by sparrow.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA15224; Wed, 28 Feb 96 20:24:54 EST
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 96 20:24:54 EST
Message-Id: <199602290124.AA15224@sparrow.lcs.mit.edu>
To: banerji@MIT.EDU
In-Reply-To: Pratip K Banerji's message of Wed, 28 Feb 1996 19:01:22 -0500 <3134ECD2.41C6@mit.edu>
Subject: Final
Cc: 6042-teachers

*** EOOH ***
From: meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Albert R. Meyer)
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 96 20:24:54 EST
To: banerji@MIT.EDU
In-Reply-To: Pratip K Banerji's message of Wed, 28 Feb 1996 19:01:22 -0500 <3134ECD2.41C6@mit.edu>
Subject: Final
Cc: 6042-teachers

   Sender: banerji@MIT.EDU
   Date: Wed, 28 Feb 1996 19:01:22 -0500
   From: Pratip K Banerji <banerji@MIT.EDU>
   Organization: Massachusetts Institute of Technology
   X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.0 (X11; I; IRIX 5.2 IP22)
   X-Url: ftp://theory.lcs/pub/classes/6.042/homepage.html

   The syllabus states that there is to be a final for 6.042 during finals
   exams week, but the final exam schedule makes no note of it.

   Which is correct? Thanks.
   -- 
   Pratip K. Banerji                       
   banerji@mit.edu
   http://www.mit.edu:8001/people/banerji/banerji.html

We're trying to get a schedule for the final.

Yours truly,
Prof. Albert R. Meyer


1,,
Summary-line: 28-Feb               to: 6042-tas  #TASKLOG, html, encryption, grading
Return-Path: <meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from sparrow.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA23747; Wed, 28 Feb 96 21:28:44 EST
From: meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Albert R. Meyer)
Received: by sparrow.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA15306; Wed, 28 Feb 96 21:28:48 EST
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 96 21:28:48 EST
Message-Id: <199602290228.AA15306@sparrow.lcs.mit.edu>
To: 6042-tas
Subject: TASKLOG, html, encryption, grading

*** EOOH ***
From: meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Albert R. Meyer)
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 96 21:28:48 EST
To: 6042-tas
Subject: TASKLOG, html, encryption, grading

1. Please format TASKLOG so I can tell, for example, who is doing recitations
this Friday.

2. Thanks to Andrew for putting tutorial problems in class web page.  I
suggest they all be given handout numbers and included in that list.
ANDREW: will you do this?  (I don't think we gain by keeping tutorials in
a separate category from other handouts, and tut4 is already
labelled "handout 10".)

Looks like Andrew also updated the recitation list today, I presume to
include the new students.  I've added this last-update date to the html
page.  Anyone doing further update should remember to keep the date set
properly.

3. Remember to keep quiz problems and drafts ENCRYPTED.  We now have a course
encryption key you can get from Parry, Daniele or me.  Use it to encrypt
quiz problems you want the rest of us to be able to read.  Emacs has a
nice "crypt-encrypted-mode" for doing this.  Add

   ;;---------------From David Jones for crypt mode---------------
   (load "krypt++" t t)

   (fset 'crypt-mode 'crypt-encrypted-mode)

to your .emacs file to get it.

4. RE Q1 GRADING:
 ANDREW, PARRY, RON: how many person-hours has it taken in the past
 to grade Q1?  Should we involve the undergrad graders?

 EVERYONE: what hours on Wed 3/6 between 10 and 5 can you be
 available to grade?

Thanks, A.


1,,
Summary-line: 29-Feb   achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu  #Pre-Quiz office hours
Return-Path: <achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from kingfisher.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA03021; Thu, 29 Feb 96 10:02:53 EST
From: achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Andrew Chou)
Received: by kingfisher.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA27825; Thu, 29 Feb 96 10:08:05 EST
Date: Thu, 29 Feb 96 10:08:05 EST
Message-Id: <199602291508.AA27825@kingfisher.lcs.mit.edu>
To: 6042-tas
Cc: 6042-lecturers
Subject: Pre-Quiz office hours

*** EOOH ***
From: achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Andrew Chou)
Date: Thu, 29 Feb 96 10:08:05 EST
To: 6042-tas
Cc: 6042-lecturers
Subject: Pre-Quiz office hours

We should change our office hours next week so accomodate the quiz.

I think 3 of us on Monday, and one of on Tuesday would be good.

So, how about 12-2, 2-4, 4-6 on Mon. and Tues 4-6?

I can do any block.  Let me know your preference.

-- Andrew


1,,
Summary-line: 29-Feb   achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu  #Draft for quiz announcement
Return-Path: <achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from kingfisher.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA03745; Thu, 29 Feb 96 10:33:14 EST
From: achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Andrew Chou)
Received: by kingfisher.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA27906; Thu, 29 Feb 96 10:38:27 EST
Date: Thu, 29 Feb 96 10:38:27 EST
Message-Id: <199602291538.AA27906@kingfisher.lcs.mit.edu>
To: 6042-teachers
Subject: Draft for quiz announcement

*** EOOH ***
From: achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Andrew Chou)
Date: Thu, 29 Feb 96 10:38:27 EST
To: 6042-teachers
Subject: Draft for quiz announcement

I drafted a quiz announcement to send to the 6042-forum.
Please let me know if there should be any changes.

QUIZ 1 ANNOUNCEMENT

This is a reminder that Quiz 1 is this coming Tues, March 5.  It will
be held in Walker Memorial from 7-9 pm.  

The quiz is OPEN BOOK and OPEN NOTES.  Calculators are permitted, though
not required.

The material will cover Lectures 1-6 (up thorugh Posets and Dilworth's
thm).  Dilworth's thm will actually be presented at the start of
Lecture 7 (to finish up Lecture 6).  The main body of Lecture 7 --
functions, cardinality, and countability -- will NOT be on the quiz.

If you have an unavoidable conflict, contact a staff member ASAP.



1,,
Summary-line: 29-Feb  to: achou@theory.lcs.mit.  #TASKLOG, html, encryption, grading
Return-Path: <meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from stork.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA03902; Thu, 29 Feb 96 10:43:04 EST
From: meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Albert R. Meyer)
Received: by stork.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA02694; Thu, 29 Feb 96 10:43:56 EST
Date: Thu, 29 Feb 96 10:43:56 EST
Message-Id: <199602291543.AA02694@stork.lcs.mit.edu>
To: achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu
In-Reply-To: Andrew Chou's message of Thu, 29 Feb 96 10:19:26 EST <199602291519.AA27857@kingfisher.lcs.mit.edu>
Subject: TASKLOG, html, encryption, grading
Cc: 6042-teachers

*** EOOH ***
From: meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Albert R. Meyer)
Date: Thu, 29 Feb 96 10:43:56 EST
To: achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu
In-Reply-To: Andrew Chou's message of Thu, 29 Feb 96 10:19:26 EST <199602291519.AA27857@kingfisher.lcs.mit.edu>
Subject: TASKLOG, html, encryption, grading
Cc: 6042-teachers

   From: achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Andrew Chou)
   Date: Thu, 29 Feb 96 10:19:26 EST

   Hi Albert,

   I modified the handouts/tutorials as you suggested.
Thanks.  FYI: I found and corrected a typo in your link to H12.

   There's been lots
   of changes to the recitation list, so that's probably not current.  I
   definitely have not modified it recently.  At this point in the
   course, everyone better know where their tutorial and recitation
   assignments are.
Yes, but we certainly need an accurate record of who belongs where, and I
think it should be available to the students.  I'd like one TA to be in
charge of maintaining the class/recitation/tutorial list (online and
offline).  VOLUNTEER?

   In terms of grading, the TA's have tutorials on Wed (which run from
   10-5), so there's really no block of time we're all free.  I can grade
   the night of.  In the past, we didn't have the graders help.  If we
   have exactly 6 problems, then each of us can grade one (which
   generally takes 2-4 hours).  I can almost certainly get the graders
   help, if you feel the need.

   -- Andrew

Let's defer decision on this till after we have Q1 draft (tonight?).
Meanwhile, everyone please indicate hours of availability for grading next
wed.  I'm free 10--5 that day.

Regards, A.


1,,
Summary-line: 29-Feb  to: achou@theory.lcs.mit.  #Draft for quiz announcement
Return-Path: <meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from stork.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA04112; Thu, 29 Feb 96 10:56:07 EST
From: meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Albert R. Meyer)
Received: by stork.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA02699; Thu, 29 Feb 96 10:56:58 EST
Date: Thu, 29 Feb 96 10:56:58 EST
Message-Id: <199602291556.AA02699@stork.lcs.mit.edu>
To: achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu
Cc: 6042-teachers
In-Reply-To: Andrew Chou's message of Thu, 29 Feb 96 10:38:27 EST <199602291538.AA27906@kingfisher.lcs.mit.edu>
Subject: Draft for quiz announcement

*** EOOH ***
From: meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Albert R. Meyer)
Date: Thu, 29 Feb 96 10:56:58 EST
To: achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu
Cc: 6042-teachers
In-Reply-To: Andrew Chou's message of Thu, 29 Feb 96 10:38:27 EST <199602291538.AA27906@kingfisher.lcs.mit.edu>
Subject: Draft for quiz announcement

MY REVISION OF YOUR ANNOUNCEMENT.  Confirm with Ron, then broadcast to
6042-forum and place in course homepage too.

Thanks, A.
---------------------------------

                           QUIZ 1 ANNOUNCEMENT

Quiz 1 is this TUESDAY, MARCH 5, 7PM--9PM in WALKER MEMORIAL.  If you have
an unavoidable conflict, contact a staff member immediately.

The quiz is OPEN BOOK and OPEN NOTES.  (No electronic gadgets allowed,
however.)

The material will cover Lectures 1--6 and Dilworth's Thm for Posets given
at the beginning of Lecture 7.  The rest of Lecture 7 --- functions,
cardinality, and countability --- will NOT be on the quiz.


1,,
Summary-line: 29-Feb  to: meyer@theory.lcs.mit.  #Draft for quiz announcement
Return-Path: <meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from stork.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA04343; Thu, 29 Feb 96 11:09:21 EST
From: meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Albert R. Meyer)
Received: by stork.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA02747; Thu, 29 Feb 96 11:10:13 EST
Date: Thu, 29 Feb 96 11:10:13 EST
Message-Id: <199602291610.AA02747@stork.lcs.mit.edu>
To: meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu
Cc: achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu, 6042-teachers
In-Reply-To: Albert R. Meyer's message of Thu, 29 Feb 96 10:56:58 EST <199602291556.AA02699@stork.lcs.mit.edu>
Subject: Draft for quiz announcement

*** EOOH ***
From: meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Albert R. Meyer)
Date: Thu, 29 Feb 96 11:10:13 EST
To: meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu
Cc: achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu, 6042-teachers
In-Reply-To: Albert R. Meyer's message of Thu, 29 Feb 96 10:56:58 EST <199602291556.AA02699@stork.lcs.mit.edu>
Subject: Draft for quiz announcement

   FURTHER REVISION:

                              QUIZ 1 ANNOUNCEMENT

   Quiz 1 is this TUESDAY, MARCH 5, 7PM--9PM in WALKER MEMORIAL.  If you have
   an unavoidable conflict, contact a staff member immediately.

   The quiz is OPEN BOOK and OPEN NOTES.  (No electronic gadgets allowed,
   however.)

   The material will cover Lectures 1--6, and Dilworth's Thm for Posets and
   the Pigeon-Hole Principle given at the beginning of Lecture 7.  The
   rest of Lecture 7 --- functions, cardinality, and countability --- will
   NOT be on the quiz.



1,,
Summary-line: 29-Feb  miccianc@theory.lcs.mit.e  #Re: TASKLOG, html, encryption, grading
Return-Path: <miccianc@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from kingfisher.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA05850; Thu, 29 Feb 96 12:25:29 EST
From: miccianc@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Daniele Micciancio)
Received: by kingfisher.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA28231; Thu, 29 Feb 96 12:30:42 EST
Date: Thu, 29 Feb 96 12:30:42 EST
Message-Id: <199602291730.AA28231@kingfisher.lcs.mit.edu>
To: meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu
In-Reply-To: <199602290228.AA15306@sparrow.lcs.mit.edu> (meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu)
Subject: Re: TASKLOG, html, encryption, grading
Cc: 6042-tas

*** EOOH ***
From: miccianc@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Daniele Micciancio)
Date: Thu, 29 Feb 96 12:30:42 EST
To: meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu
In-Reply-To: <199602290228.AA15306@sparrow.lcs.mit.edu> (meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu)
Subject: Re: TASKLOG, html, encryption, grading
Cc: 6042-tas


> EVERYONE: what hours on Wed 3/6 between 10 and 5 can you be
> available to grade?

I can be available 
from 12 to 2:30 and 
from 4:00 to 5:00.

--Daniele


1,,
Summary-line: 29-Feb   kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu  #Re: TASKLOG, html, encryption, grading 
Return-Path: <kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from sparrow.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA05982; Thu, 29 Feb 96 12:31:18 EST
Received: from sparrow.lcs.mit.edu by sparrow.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA15686; Thu, 29 Feb 96 12:31:21 EST
Message-Id: <199602291731.AA15686@sparrow.lcs.mit.edu>
X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.2 7/18/95
To: 6042-teachers
Subject: Re: TASKLOG, html, encryption, grading 
In-Reply-To: Your message of Thu, 29 Feb 96 10:43:56 -0500.
             <199602291543.AA02694@stork.lcs.mit.edu> 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Thu, 29 Feb 96 12:31:20 -0500
From: kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu

*** EOOH ***
X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.2 7/18/95
To: 6042-teachers
Subject: Re: TASKLOG, html, encryption, grading 
In-Reply-To: Your message of Thu, 29 Feb 96 10:43:56 -0500.
             <199602291543.AA02694@stork.lcs.mit.edu> 
Date: Thu, 29 Feb 96 12:31:20 -0500
From: kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu



> Let's defer decision on this till after we have Q1 draft (tonight?).
> Meanwhile, everyone please indicate hours of availability for grading next
> wed.  I'm free 10--5 that day.
> 
> Regards, A.

I am fee after 2pm. I normally have office hrs from 3-5, but I think there 
would be no harm if I canceled them.

--Jakov



1,,
Summary-line: 29-Feb  miccianc@theory.lcs.mit.e  #Re: Pre-Quiz office hours
Return-Path: <miccianc@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from kingfisher.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA05951; Thu, 29 Feb 96 12:29:33 EST
From: miccianc@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Daniele Micciancio)
Received: by kingfisher.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA28240; Thu, 29 Feb 96 12:34:45 EST
Date: Thu, 29 Feb 96 12:34:45 EST
Message-Id: <199602291734.AA28240@kingfisher.lcs.mit.edu>
To: 6042-tas
In-Reply-To: <199602291508.AA27825@kingfisher.lcs.mit.edu> (achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu)
Subject: Re: Pre-Quiz office hours

*** EOOH ***
From: miccianc@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Daniele Micciancio)
Date: Thu, 29 Feb 96 12:34:45 EST
To: 6042-tas
In-Reply-To: <199602291508.AA27825@kingfisher.lcs.mit.edu> (achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu)
Subject: Re: Pre-Quiz office hours


I can do Monday 
either 12-2 or 4-6

--Daniele


1,,
Summary-line: 29-Feb   kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu  #Re: TASKLOG, html, encryption, grading 
Return-Path: <kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from sparrow.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA07330; Thu, 29 Feb 96 13:36:48 EST
Received: from sparrow.lcs.mit.edu by sparrow.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA15843; Thu, 29 Feb 96 13:36:50 EST
Message-Id: <199602291836.AA15843@sparrow.lcs.mit.edu>
X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.2 7/18/95
To: meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Albert R. Meyer)
Cc: 6042-tas
Subject: Re: TASKLOG, html, encryption, grading 
In-Reply-To: Your message of Wed, 28 Feb 96 21:28:48 -0500.
             <199602290228.AA15306@sparrow.lcs.mit.edu> 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Thu, 29 Feb 96 13:36:50 -0500
From: kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu

*** EOOH ***
X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.2 7/18/95
To: meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Albert R. Meyer)
Cc: 6042-tas
Subject: Re: TASKLOG, html, encryption, grading 
In-Reply-To: Your message of Wed, 28 Feb 96 21:28:48 -0500.
             <199602290228.AA15306@sparrow.lcs.mit.edu> 
Date: Thu, 29 Feb 96 13:36:50 -0500
From: kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu


> 1. Please format TASKLOG so I can tell, for example, who is doing recitations
> this Friday.

I changed the TASKLOG so there is a list of "todo" tasks at the top. I also 
added the locking trick form David at the end of the file. Emacs may ask you 
if you want to set the variables, so say yes.

--Jakov



1,,
Summary-line: 29-Feb   kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu  #Re: Pre-Quiz office hours 
Return-Path: <kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from sparrow.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA07369; Thu, 29 Feb 96 13:38:16 EST
Received: from sparrow.lcs.mit.edu by sparrow.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA15861; Thu, 29 Feb 96 13:38:18 EST
Message-Id: <199602291838.AA15861@sparrow.lcs.mit.edu>
X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.2 7/18/95
To: achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Andrew Chou)
Cc: 6042-tas, 6042-lecturers
Subject: Re: Pre-Quiz office hours 
In-Reply-To: Your message of Thu, 29 Feb 96 10:08:05 -0500.
             <199602291508.AA27825@kingfisher.lcs.mit.edu> 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Thu, 29 Feb 96 13:38:18 -0500
From: kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu

*** EOOH ***
X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.2 7/18/95
To: achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Andrew Chou)
Cc: 6042-tas, 6042-lecturers
Subject: Re: Pre-Quiz office hours 
In-Reply-To: Your message of Thu, 29 Feb 96 10:08:05 -0500.
             <199602291508.AA27825@kingfisher.lcs.mit.edu> 
Date: Thu, 29 Feb 96 13:38:18 -0500
From: kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu


I can do mon 4-6
--Jakov



1,,
Summary-line: 29-Feb  rivest@theory.lcs.mit.edu  #[meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu: Draft for quiz announcement]
Return-Path: <rivest@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from swan.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA07510; Thu, 29 Feb 96 13:45:17 EST
From: rivest@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Ron Rivest)
Received: by swan.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA25891; Thu, 29 Feb 96 13:45:16 EST
Date: Thu, 29 Feb 96 13:45:16 EST
Message-Id: <199602291845.AA25891@swan.lcs.mit.edu>
To: meyer
Cc: 6042-teachers
Subject: [meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu: Draft for quiz announcement]

*** EOOH ***
From: rivest@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Ron Rivest)
Date: Thu, 29 Feb 96 13:45:16 EST
To: meyer
Cc: 6042-teachers
Subject: [meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu: Draft for quiz announcement]


I see no reason not to allow calculators, pet frogs, or yo-yos...
(No llamas..)

	Ron
==============================================================================
Return-Path: <meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
From: meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Albert R. Meyer)
Date: Thu, 29 Feb 96 10:56:58 EST
To: achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu
Cc: 6042-teachers
In-Reply-To: Andrew Chou's message of Thu, 29 Feb 96 10:38:27 EST <199602291538.AA27906@kingfisher.lcs.mit.edu>
Subject: Draft for quiz announcement

MY REVISION OF YOUR ANNOUNCEMENT.  Confirm with Ron, then broadcast to
6042-forum and place in course homepage too.

Thanks, A.
---------------------------------

                           QUIZ 1 ANNOUNCEMENT

Quiz 1 is this TUESDAY, MARCH 5, 7PM--9PM in WALKER MEMORIAL.  If you have
an unavoidable conflict, contact a staff member immediately.

The quiz is OPEN BOOK and OPEN NOTES.  (No electronic gadgets allowed,
however.)

The material will cover Lectures 1--6 and Dilworth's Thm for Posets given
at the beginning of Lecture 7.  The rest of Lecture 7 --- functions,
cardinality, and countability --- will NOT be on the quiz.



0, unseen,,
Summary-line: 29-Feb          to: 6042-teachers  #H14-Soln3-meyer.tex
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from stork.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA16242; Thu, 29 Feb 96 22:13:27 EST
From: meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Albert R. Meyer)
Received: by stork.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA03662; Thu, 29 Feb 96 22:14:20 EST
Date: Thu, 29 Feb 96 22:14:20 EST
Message-Id: <199603010314.AA03662@stork.lcs.mit.edu>
To: 6042-teachers
Subject: H14-Soln3-meyer.tex

ANDREW: my revisions and %%'d comments calling for more revisions are in
above file.

Regards, A.


1,,
Summary-line:  1-Mar   achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu  #Final exam
Return-Path: <achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from kiwi.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA26127; Fri, 01 Mar 96 10:17:24 EST
From: achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Andrew Chou)
Received: by kiwi.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA18532; Fri, 01 Mar 96 10:17:24 EST
Date: Fri, 01 Mar 96 10:17:24 EST
Message-Id: <199603011517.AA18532@kiwi.lcs.mit.edu>
To: 6042-teachers
Subject: Final exam

*** EOOH ***
From: achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Andrew Chou)
Date: Fri, 01 Mar 96 10:17:24 EST
To: 6042-teachers
Subject: Final exam

I called the schedules office, and they want us to poll the class to
find the time with the least number of conflicts.  Then, they'll give
us a room at that time.  I guess we should do this electronically, but
it could still be a pain.  Any good suggestions?

-- Andrew




1,,
Summary-line:  1-Mar  rivest@theory.lcs.mit.edu  #[achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu: Final exam]
Return-Path: <rivest@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from swan.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA26250; Fri, 01 Mar 96 10:23:17 EST
From: rivest@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Ron Rivest)
Received: by swan.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA26505; Fri, 01 Mar 96 10:23:16 EST
Date: Fri, 01 Mar 96 10:23:16 EST
Message-Id: <199603011523.AA26505@swan.lcs.mit.edu>
To: 6042-teachers
Subject: [achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu: Final exam]

*** EOOH ***
From: rivest@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Ron Rivest)
Date: Fri, 01 Mar 96 10:23:16 EST
To: 6042-teachers
Subject: [achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu: Final exam]


Suggestion send out email with explicit instructions to return
email with keywords indicating which times are no good for them.
(e.g. "WED-22-AM" might be the keyword for the morning exam on Wednesday
the 22nd of May.)
Check that each reply includes each keyword at most once (or process them to
guarantee this -- no ballot box stuffing).

Concatante all the replies and run them through a simple program to count
word occurrences... (probably this exists, or can be written easily...)

	Cheers,
	Ron
==============================================================================
Return-Path: <achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
From: achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Andrew Chou)
Date: Fri, 01 Mar 96 10:17:24 EST
To: 6042-teachers
Subject: Final exam

I called the schedules office, and they want us to poll the class to
find the time with the least number of conflicts.  Then, they'll give
us a room at that time.  I guess we should do this electronically, but
it could still be a pain.  Any good suggestions?

-- Andrew





0, unseen,,
Summary-line:  2-Mar          to: 6042-teachers  #[kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu: quiz questions]
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from sparrow.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA19663; Sat, 02 Mar 96 17:10:42 EST
From: meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Albert R. Meyer)
Received: by sparrow.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA17580; Sat, 02 Mar 96 17:10:41 EST
Date: Sat, 02 Mar 96 17:10:41 EST
Message-Id: <199603022210.AA17580@sparrow.lcs.mit.edu>
To: 6042-teachers
Subject: [kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu: quiz questions]

FYI:

To: meyer
Cc: kucan
Subject: quiz questions
Date: Sat, 02 Mar 96 14:01:23 -0500
From: kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu


I made a quiz question about properties of realtions. I didn't make it
as a table since it seemed more practical to do it as separate
questions. It is in file q1-jakov-1.tex in the Quiz1 directory.

--Jakov




0, unseen,,
Summary-line:  2-Mar          to: 6042-teachers  #eq-prob.tex
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from sparrow.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA20457; Sat, 02 Mar 96 18:33:58 EST
From: meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Albert R. Meyer)
Received: by sparrow.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA17637; Sat, 02 Mar 96 18:34:00 EST
Date: Sat, 02 Mar 96 18:34:00 EST
Message-Id: <199603022334.AA17637@sparrow.lcs.mit.edu>
To: 6042-teachers
Subject: eq-prob.tex

is in Quiz1 directory for your inspection and comments.
Regards, A. 


1,,
Summary-line:  3-Mar   parry@theory.lcs.mit.edu  #Some more problems
Return-Path: <parry@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from sparrow.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA29629; Sun, 03 Mar 96 12:15:04 EST
Received: from sparrow.lcs.mit.edu by sparrow.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA18167; Sun, 03 Mar 96 12:15:07 EST
Message-Id: <199603031715.AA18167@sparrow.lcs.mit.edu>
X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.2 7/18/95
To: 6042-teachers
Subject: Some more problems
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Sun, 03 Mar 96 12:15:06 -0500
From: parry@theory.lcs.mit.edu

*** EOOH ***
X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.2 7/18/95
To: 6042-teachers
Subject: Some more problems
Date: Sun, 03 Mar 96 12:15:06 -0500
From: parry@theory.lcs.mit.edu

I left a couple of problems and suggestions in q1-parry.tex.

Parry



0, unseen,,
Summary-line:  3-Mar  miccianc@theory.lcs.mit.e  #q1-dan-1.tex
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <miccianc@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from kingfisher.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA29715; Sun, 03 Mar 96 12:18:48 EST
From: miccianc@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Daniele Micciancio)
Received: by kingfisher.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA05314; Sun, 03 Mar 96 12:24:03 EST
Date: Sun, 03 Mar 96 12:24:03 EST
Message-Id: <199603031724.AA05314@kingfisher.lcs.mit.edu>
To: 6042-teachers
Subject: q1-dan-1.tex


q1-dan-1.tex is in Quiz1 directory.

ALBERT: can't latex eq-prob:
"! Incomplete \ifnum; all text was ignored after line 52.
 <inserted text> 
		\fi" 
              


0, unseen,,
Summary-line:  3-Mar   miccianc@theory.lcs.mit.  #q1-dan-1.tex
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from sparrow.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA01765; Sun, 03 Mar 96 15:34:59 EST
From: meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Albert R. Meyer)
Received: by sparrow.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA18333; Sun, 03 Mar 96 15:35:01 EST
Date: Sun, 03 Mar 96 15:35:01 EST
Message-Id: <199603032035.AA18333@sparrow.lcs.mit.edu>
To: miccianc@theory.lcs.mit.edu
In-Reply-To: Daniele Micciancio's message of Sun, 03 Mar 96 12:24:03 EST <199603031724.AA05314@kingfisher.lcs.mit.edu>
Subject: q1-dan-1.tex
Cc: 6042-teachers

   From: miccianc@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Daniele Micciancio)
   Date: Sun, 03 Mar 96 12:24:03 EST


   q1-dan-1.tex is in Quiz1 directory.

   ALBERT: can't latex eq-prob:
   "! Incomplete \ifnum; all text was ignored after line 52.
    <inserted text> 
                   \fi" 


I've put a crypted eq-prob.ps file in Quiz1 for you.

The eq-prob.tex source file LaTeX's fine for me in all my directories
except Quiz1.

It seems that files I create in Quiz1/ get encrypted automatically.  RON:
DID YOU ARRANGE THIS?

Regards, A.


0, unseen,,
Summary-line:  3-Mar               to: 6042-tas  #[rivest@theory.lcs.mit.edu: q1-dan-1.tex]
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from sparrow.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA02480; Sun, 03 Mar 96 16:36:32 EST
From: meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Albert R. Meyer)
Received: by sparrow.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA18469; Sun, 03 Mar 96 16:36:34 EST
Date: Sun, 03 Mar 96 16:36:34 EST
Message-Id: <199603032136.AA18469@sparrow.lcs.mit.edu>
To: 6042-tas
Subject: [rivest@theory.lcs.mit.edu: q1-dan-1.tex]

FYI:

From: rivest@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Ron Rivest)
Date: Sun, 03 Mar 96 15:46:31 EST
To: meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu
Subject: q1-dan-1.tex


No, I didn't arrange to encrypt files automatically, although I did 
encrypt all of the tex files after decrypting them and copying them to
my home pc...

	Cheers,	
	Ron



1,,
Summary-line:  3-Mar   kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu  #eq-prob comments
Return-Path: <kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from sparrow.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA03426; Sun, 03 Mar 96 18:05:07 EST
Received: from sparrow.lcs.mit.edu by sparrow.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA18641; Sun, 03 Mar 96 18:05:10 EST
Message-Id: <199603032305.AA18641@sparrow.lcs.mit.edu>
X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.2 7/18/95
To: 6042-teachers
Subject: eq-prob comments
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Sun, 03 Mar 96 18:05:09 -0500
From: kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu

*** EOOH ***
X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.2 7/18/95
To: 6042-teachers
Subject: eq-prob comments
Date: Sun, 03 Mar 96 18:05:09 -0500
From: kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu


I put my comments in eq-prob-notes (in the Quiz1 directory)

--Jakov

p.s. what have we agreed for the alternate quiz time?




0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from sparrow.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA06453; Sun, 03 Mar 96 22:42:53 EST
From: meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Albert R. Meyer)
Received: by sparrow.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA19012; Sun, 03 Mar 96 22:42:55 EST
Date: Sun, 03 Mar 96 22:42:55 EST
Message-Id: <199603040342.AA19012@sparrow.lcs.mit.edu>
To: 6042-teachers
Subject: Quiz1/5probs.tex{ps}

This is the latest version including some proposed probs from Parry,
Andrew, Daniele.  I think we're OK on equational proving, gcd's, modular
arith, equiv relations and partial orders, parallel-schedulng.

I'd also like to have:

1. A problem on CHINESE REMAINDER or RSA, probably in place of one of the
two current GCD probs.

2. An INDUCTION PROBLEM, preferably structural induction.  Andrew's
proposed binary tree problem is a possibility (see Quiz1/chouprobs).  So
is Parry's 55^k problem (see Quiz/q1-parry.tex).  I have one (see sub.tex)
on substitution into expressions as a proof-rule, but am concerned it
gives overemphasis on the Quiz to formal equational proofs.

Please send me your COMMENTS/CORRECTIONS asap tomorrow.


Regards, A.


0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <rivest@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from swan.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA06642; Sun, 03 Mar 96 22:57:06 EST
From: rivest@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Ron Rivest)
Received: by swan.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA28528; Sun, 03 Mar 96 22:57:06 EST
Date: Sun, 03 Mar 96 22:57:06 EST
Message-Id: <199603040357.AA28528@swan.lcs.mit.edu>
To: 6042-teachers
Subject: Quiz1


I'm putting some comments on the state of the quiz problems into
file "qron" in the quiz directory...

I will be out of town tomorrow, so I will not be able to assist further
in quiz preparation tomorrow.  I'll be back tomorrow night, and in Tuesday.  
Fortunately, I think we are in pretty good shape...

	Cheers,
	Ron
==============================================================================
Return-Path: <meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
From: meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Albert R. Meyer)
Date: Sun, 03 Mar 96 22:42:55 EST
To: 6042-teachers
Subject: Quiz1/5probs.tex{ps}

This is the latest version including some proposed probs from Parry,
Andrew, Daniele.  I think we're OK on equational proving, gcd's, modular
arith, equiv relations and partial orders, parallel-schedulng.

I'd also like to have:

1. A problem on CHINESE REMAINDER or RSA, probably in place of one of the
two current GCD probs.

2. An INDUCTION PROBLEM, preferably structural induction.  Andrew's
proposed binary tree problem is a possibility (see Quiz1/chouprobs).  So
is Parry's 55^k problem (see Quiz/q1-parry.tex).  I have one (see sub.tex)
on substitution into expressions as a proof-rule, but am concerned it
gives overemphasis on the Quiz to formal equational proofs.

Please send me your COMMENTS/CORRECTIONS asap tomorrow.


Regards, A.



0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <parry@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from sparrow.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA06689; Sun, 03 Mar 96 23:00:48 EST
Received: from sparrow.lcs.mit.edu by sparrow.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA19115; Sun, 03 Mar 96 23:00:51 EST
Message-Id: <199603040400.AA19115@sparrow.lcs.mit.edu>
To: 6042-teachers
Subject: Special arrangements
Date: Sun, 03 Mar 96 23:00:50 -0500
From: parry@theory.lcs.mit.edu

In addition the the makeup time, we have to make some special arrangements
for Sam Hartman (who is blind).  He said that usually he is given some extra
time and the problems are recorded on a tape (or something).  I can email
him tomorrow to see what would work best.

Parry


0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from sparrow.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA06781; Sun, 03 Mar 96 23:06:02 EST
From: meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Albert R. Meyer)
Received: by sparrow.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA19124; Sun, 03 Mar 96 23:06:04 EST
Date: Sun, 03 Mar 96 23:06:04 EST
Message-Id: <199603040406.AA19124@sparrow.lcs.mit.edu>
To: 6042-teachers
Subject: Quiz logistics

I propose the alternate quiz time be 4:45pm--6:45 Tuesday, at or near my
office.  I won't be available to supervise this however.  WHO ELSE CAN BE
AROUND THEN?

I will be able at 6:30pm Tue to help carry the quizzes and bluebooks over
to Walker.  I like 2 TA's to help carry the stuff and proctor the first
hour of the quiz.  (I plan to be there for the first 45 minutes only.)
The other two TA's should show up around 8pm and stay to collect quiz
books at 9pm.  LET ME KNOW WHO WANTS WHICH QUIZ "SHIFT".

Our blind student, Sam Hartman, will show up on time (7pm) at Walker to
take the exam.  We need someone to stay and read him the exam, preferably
in a private area.  Let me know if you can do it, or should we try to
RECRUIT A GRADER?

Regards, A.


0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from sparrow.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA08654; Mon, 04 Mar 96 02:39:03 EST
From: meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Albert R. Meyer)
Received: by sparrow.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA19372; Mon, 04 Mar 96 02:39:05 EST
Date: Mon, 04 Mar 96 02:39:05 EST
Message-Id: <199603040739.AA19372@sparrow.lcs.mit.edu>
To: 6042-teachers
Subject: quiz1-draft.tex{ps}

is now complete.  You can print the ps, but also look at the comments in
the LaTeX source for some queries and alternative versions of problems.

My main concern is that there's a bit too much proof.

Let me know what you think of it.

Regards, A.


0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <miccianc@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from kingfisher.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA17049; Mon, 04 Mar 96 12:06:38 EST
From: miccianc@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Daniele Micciancio)
Received: by kingfisher.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA07705; Mon, 04 Mar 96 12:11:56 EST
Date: Mon, 04 Mar 96 12:11:56 EST
Message-Id: <199603041711.AA07705@kingfisher.lcs.mit.edu>
To: meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu
In-Reply-To: <199603040406.AA19124@sparrow.lcs.mit.edu> (meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu)
Subject: Re: Quiz logistics
Cc: 6042-teachers


tomorrow I cannot proctor the quiz at 4:45,
but I am available any time after 6:30.

--Daniele


0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from sparrow.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA17396; Mon, 04 Mar 96 12:23:15 EST
Received: from sparrow.lcs.mit.edu by sparrow.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA19843; Mon, 04 Mar 96 12:23:18 EST
Message-Id: <199603041723.AA19843@sparrow.lcs.mit.edu>
X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.2 7/18/95
To: meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Albert R. Meyer)
Cc: 6042-teachers
Subject: Re: quiz1-draft.tex{ps} 
In-Reply-To: Your message of Mon, 04 Mar 96 02:39:05 -0500.
             <199603040739.AA19372@sparrow.lcs.mit.edu> 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Mon, 04 Mar 96 12:23:18 -0500
From: kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu

> is now complete.  You can print the ps, but also look at the comments in
> the LaTeX source for some queries and alternative versions of problems.
> 
> My main concern is that there's a bit too much proof.
> 
> Let me know what you think of it.
> 
> Regards, A.

see my comments and solutions in quiz1-draft-notes

--Jakov



0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from sparrow.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA17440; Mon, 04 Mar 96 12:25:23 EST
Received: from sparrow.lcs.mit.edu by sparrow.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA19862; Mon, 04 Mar 96 12:25:26 EST
Message-Id: <199603041725.AA19862@sparrow.lcs.mit.edu>
X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.2 7/18/95
To: meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Albert R. Meyer)
Cc: 6042-teachers
Subject: Re: Quiz logistics 
In-Reply-To: Your message of Sun, 03 Mar 96 23:06:04 -0500.
             <199603040406.AA19124@sparrow.lcs.mit.edu> 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Mon, 04 Mar 96 12:25:26 -0500
From: kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu


> I propose the alternate quiz time be 4:45pm--6:45 Tuesday, at or near my
> office.  I won't be available to supervise this however.  WHO ELSE CAN BE
> AROUND THEN?
> 
> I will be able at 6:30pm Tue to help carry the quizzes and bluebooks over
> to Walker.  I like 2 TA's to help carry the stuff and proctor the first
> hour of the quiz.  (I plan to be there for the first 45 minutes only.)
> The other two TA's should show up around 8pm and stay to collect quiz
> books at 9pm.  LET ME KNOW WHO WANTS WHICH QUIZ "SHIFT".
> 
> Our blind student, Sam Hartman, will show up on time (7pm) at Walker to
> take the exam.  We need someone to stay and read him the exam, preferably
> in a private area.  Let me know if you can do it, or should we try to
> RECRUIT A GRADER?
> 
> Regards, A.

I'm available of protoring at all of the above times.

--Jakov



0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from swan.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA18653; Mon, 04 Mar 96 13:31:29 EST
From: achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Andrew Chou)
Received: by swan.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA28826; Mon, 04 Mar 96 13:31:28 EST
Date: Mon, 04 Mar 96 13:31:28 EST
Message-Id: <199603041831.AA28826@swan.lcs.mit.edu>
To: 6042-teachers
Subject: [achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu: Conflict quiz]

I sent this message to the people with conflicts.

-- Andrew

Return-Path: <achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
From: achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Andrew Chou)
Date: Mon, 04 Mar 96 13:00:31 EST
To: kgajos@MIT.EDU, ooze@MIT.EDU, nazareth@tep.org, jstipins@MIT.EDU,
        cjlin@MIT.EDU
Cc: achou
Subject: Conflict quiz

Those of you with conflicts can take the quiz from 4:45-6:45.  Meet
in the third floor lounge of NE43 (outside NE43-309).

If there are any problems with this arrangement, let us know.

-- Andrew



1,,
Return-Path: <meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from sparrow.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA18773; Mon, 04 Mar 96 13:39:55 EST
From: meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Albert R. Meyer)
Received: by sparrow.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA19958; Mon, 04 Mar 96 13:39:58 EST
Date: Mon, 04 Mar 96 13:39:58 EST
Message-Id: <199603041839.AA19958@sparrow.lcs.mit.edu>
To: 6042-teachers
Subject: quiz comments

*** EOOH ***
From: meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Albert R. Meyer)
Date: Mon, 04 Mar 96 13:39:58 EST
To: 6042-teachers
Subject: quiz comments

I've added my comments to Jakov's quiz1-draft-notes.  Thank you Jakov.

Regards, A.


0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <parry@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from sparrow.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA18873; Mon, 04 Mar 96 13:44:35 EST
Received: from sparrow.lcs.mit.edu by sparrow.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA20036; Mon, 04 Mar 96 13:44:37 EST
Message-Id: <199603041844.AA20036@sparrow.lcs.mit.edu>
X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.2 7/18/95
To: 6042-teachers
Subject: Proctoring quiz
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Mon, 04 Mar 96 13:44:37 -0500
From: parry@theory.lcs.mit.edu

I can do the 4:45-6:45 makeup quiz.  The 7-9 one may be a problem for me.

Parry


0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from kingfisher.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA18847; Mon, 04 Mar 96 13:43:54 EST
From: achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Andrew Chou)
Received: by kingfisher.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA07896; Mon, 04 Mar 96 13:49:12 EST
Date: Mon, 04 Mar 96 13:49:12 EST
Message-Id: <199603041849.AA07896@kingfisher.lcs.mit.edu>
To: 6042-teachers

The quiz looks fine.  I just have two general comments (which I don't think
I need to encrypt).

1)  It seems logic heavy.  Maybe we could drop one problem?

2)  I would ask them to sketch a proof for problem 7.

-- Andrew


0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from sparrow.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA19031; Mon, 04 Mar 96 13:52:37 EST
Received: from sparrow.lcs.mit.edu by sparrow.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA20154; Mon, 04 Mar 96 13:52:40 EST
Message-Id: <199603041852.AA20154@sparrow.lcs.mit.edu>
X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.2 7/18/95
To: meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Albert R. Meyer)
Cc: 6042-teachers
Subject: Re: quiz comments 
In-Reply-To: Your message of Mon, 04 Mar 96 13:39:58 -0500.
             <199603041839.AA19958@sparrow.lcs.mit.edu> 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Mon, 04 Mar 96 13:52:39 -0500
From: kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu


> I've added my comments to Jakov's quiz1-draft-notes.  Thank you Jakov.
> 
> Regards, A.

More comments in quiz1-draft-notes... Namely, I don't think we need a hint in 
#1 (but I don't object to it), and the hint in #5a seems like a good idea.

--Jakov



0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from sparrow.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA19578; Mon, 04 Mar 96 14:13:36 EST
From: meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Albert R. Meyer)
Received: by sparrow.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA20333; Mon, 04 Mar 96 14:13:39 EST
Date: Mon, 04 Mar 96 14:13:39 EST
Message-Id: <199603041913.AA20333@sparrow.lcs.mit.edu>
To: kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu
Cc: 6042-teachers
In-Reply-To: kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu's message of Mon, 04 Mar 96 13:52:39 -0500 <199603041852.AA20154@sparrow.lcs.mit.edu>
Subject: quiz comments 

    ... I don't think we need a hint in 
   #1 (but I don't object to it), and the hint in #5a seems like a good idea.

   --Jakov

OK, will include hint for 5a.  I'd like to hear from other people re hint
for 1.

Regards, A.



0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from sparrow.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA20139; Mon, 04 Mar 96 14:38:41 EST
From: meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Albert R. Meyer)
Received: by sparrow.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA20419; Mon, 04 Mar 96 14:38:44 EST
Date: Mon, 04 Mar 96 14:38:44 EST
Message-Id: <199603041938.AA20419@sparrow.lcs.mit.edu>
To: achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu
Cc: 6042-teachers
In-Reply-To: Andrew Chou's message of Mon, 04 Mar 96 13:49:12 EST <199603041849.AA07896@kingfisher.lcs.mit.edu>
Subject: q1

   1)  It seems logic heavy.  Maybe we could drop one problem?

I'd be comfortable dropping 5a as long as Prob 2 stays.  Or I'm open to
dropping Prob 2 if someone quickly provides some other good polished
structuralinduction problem.

   2)  I would ask them to sketch a proof for problem 7.

I think we have enough proofs to grade already.

Regards, A.


0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <miccianc@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from kingfisher.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA23825; Mon, 04 Mar 96 17:14:37 EST
From: miccianc@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Daniele Micciancio)
Received: by kingfisher.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA08322; Mon, 04 Mar 96 17:19:55 EST
Date: Mon, 04 Mar 96 17:19:55 EST
Message-Id: <199603042219.AA08322@kingfisher.lcs.mit.edu>
To: meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu
In-Reply-To: <199603041913.AA20333@sparrow.lcs.mit.edu> (meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu)
Subject: Re: quiz comments
Cc: 6042-teachers


> OK, will include hint for 5a.  I'd like to hear from other people re hint
> for 1.

> Regards, A.

I needed the hint to solve problem 1 in 5 minutes.
If TAs are 4 times as fast as students, I think it is 
better to give the hint.

--Daniele


0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from sparrow.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA26524; Mon, 04 Mar 96 19:56:41 EST
Received: from sparrow.lcs.mit.edu by sparrow.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA21018; Mon, 04 Mar 96 19:56:44 EST
Message-Id: <199603050056.AA21018@sparrow.lcs.mit.edu>
X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.2 7/18/95
To: 6042-teachers
Subject: ps4
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Mon, 04 Mar 96 19:56:43 -0500
From: kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu


A draft of ps4 is in the course directory (Hxx-Pset4.tex). The Dilworth's thm 
problem is left open, and we were planning to put a graph problem depending on 
what is to be covered in class.

--Jakov



0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from sparrow.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA26547; Mon, 04 Mar 96 19:57:59 EST
Received: from sparrow.lcs.mit.edu by sparrow.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA21027; Mon, 04 Mar 96 19:58:02 EST
Message-Id: <199603050058.AA21027@sparrow.lcs.mit.edu>
X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.2 7/18/95
To: 6042-teachers
Subject: quiz 1 solutions
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Mon, 04 Mar 96 19:58:02 -0500
From: kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu


when do we plan to give out the solutions? Right after the quiz, or in the 
next lecture?

--Jakov



0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from swan.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA27138; Mon, 04 Mar 96 20:49:50 EST
From: achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Andrew Chou)
Received: by swan.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA29331; Mon, 04 Mar 96 20:49:49 EST
Date: Mon, 04 Mar 96 20:49:49 EST
Message-Id: <199603050149.AA29331@swan.lcs.mit.edu>
To: 6042-teachers
Subject: [achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu: Helping with blind student]

I went ahead and recruited a grader for the blind student.  I figured
it couldn't hurt.

-- Andrew

Return-Path: <achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
From: achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Andrew Chou)
Date: Mon, 04 Mar 96 20:46:58 EST
To: etara@mit.edu
Cc: achou
Subject: Helping with blind student

Hi Tara,

We can definitely use your help.  The quiz is from 7-9 in Walker.
So, if you could meet us there, that'd be great.  Basically, you'll
just have to read the exam to him.  I find it amazing he can actually
do math.  Anyways, we'll see tomorrow.

Thanks, 

-- Andrew




1,,
Return-Path: <meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from stork.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA27227; Mon, 04 Mar 96 21:00:06 EST
From: meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Albert R. Meyer)
Received: by stork.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA04316; Mon, 04 Mar 96 21:01:02 EST
Date: Mon, 04 Mar 96 21:01:02 EST
Message-Id: <199603050201.AA04316@stork.lcs.mit.edu>
To: 6042-teachers
Subject: [isabell@eecs.MIT.EDU: final exam]

*** EOOH ***
From: meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Albert R. Meyer)
Date: Mon, 04 Mar 96 21:01:02 EST
To: 6042-teachers
Subject: [isabell@eecs.MIT.EDU: final exam]

FYI:

Date: Mon, 4 Mar 96 16:30:30 EST
From: Lisa Bella <isabell@eecs.MIT.EDU>
To: meyer@lcs.mit.edu
Subject: final exam



Hi Professor Meyer:

I received a call from the schedules office about the final exam for 6.042J. 
I never received the final exam form from you. Schedules suggests that you
poll the class to determine a good time and day to have the final to avoid
conflicts, please let me know and I will call schedules and they will
schedule the final.  If you have any questions, please let me know.

Lisa Bella
x4611



0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from stork.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA27279; Mon, 04 Mar 96 21:05:36 EST
From: meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Albert R. Meyer)
Received: by stork.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA04320; Mon, 04 Mar 96 21:06:32 EST
Date: Mon, 04 Mar 96 21:06:32 EST
Message-Id: <199603050206.AA04320@stork.lcs.mit.edu>
To: kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu
Cc: 6042-teachers
In-Reply-To: kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu's message of Mon, 04 Mar 96 19:58:02 -0500 <199603050058.AA21027@sparrow.lcs.mit.edu>
Subject: quiz 1 solutions

   X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.2 7/18/95
   Date: Mon, 04 Mar 96 19:58:02 -0500
   From: kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu


   when do we plan to give out the solutions? Right after the quiz, or in the 
   next lecture?

   --Jakov

Give out as soon as they're ready--most likely Thursday, because but we
should wait till we finish grading, since we may discover new solutions
and have comments to add as a result of that process.

Regards, A.


0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from stork.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA27322; Mon, 04 Mar 96 21:08:13 EST
From: meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Albert R. Meyer)
Received: by stork.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA04323; Mon, 04 Mar 96 21:09:09 EST
Date: Mon, 04 Mar 96 21:09:09 EST
Message-Id: <199603050209.AA04323@stork.lcs.mit.edu>
To: achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu
Cc: 6042-teachers
In-Reply-To: Andrew Chou's message of Mon, 04 Mar 96 20:49:49 EST <199603050149.AA29331@swan.lcs.mit.edu>
Subject: [achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu: Helping with blind student]

   I find it amazing he can actually
   do math.
I saw him hear and correct errors on the board in 6.001 lecture--yes, he
is amazing.

Regards, A.




0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from stork.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA29143; Mon, 04 Mar 96 23:53:34 EST
From: meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Albert R. Meyer)
Received: by stork.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA04395; Mon, 04 Mar 96 23:54:30 EST
Date: Mon, 04 Mar 96 23:54:30 EST
Message-Id: <199603050454.AA04395@stork.lcs.mit.edu>
To: 6042-teachers
Subject: quiz1

Final draft is in Quiz directory.  I'd be grateful for last proofreading
and comments from you.

Regards, A.


0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from swan.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA10164; Tue, 05 Mar 96 13:27:26 EST
From: achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Andrew Chou)
Received: by swan.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA29709; Tue, 05 Mar 96 13:27:25 EST
Date: Tue, 05 Mar 96 13:27:25 EST
Message-Id: <199603051827.AA29709@swan.lcs.mit.edu>
To: 6042-forum
Subject: Quiz 1 Reminder


QUIZ 1 is tonight in Walker Memorial, 7-9pm.

The quiz is OPEN BOOK and OPEN NOTES.  Thus, it would be prudent to
bring the text and all course handouts.  In particular, Handout 7 will
be referenced by the quiz.  We may not have many extra copies, so
you should bring your own copy.


0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <rivest@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from swan.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA11333; Tue, 05 Mar 96 14:17:22 EST
From: rivest@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Ron Rivest)
Received: by swan.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA29773; Tue, 05 Mar 96 14:17:20 EST
Date: Tue, 05 Mar 96 14:17:20 EST
Message-Id: <199603051917.AA29773@swan.lcs.mit.edu>
To: 6042-teachers
Subject: Q1 


is ready...

	Cheers,
	Ron



0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <parry@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from sparrow.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA11889; Tue, 05 Mar 96 14:46:55 EST
Received: from sparrow.lcs.mit.edu by sparrow.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA21542; Tue, 05 Mar 96 14:46:59 EST
Message-Id: <199603051946.AA21542@sparrow.lcs.mit.edu>
X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.2 7/18/95
To: 6042-teachers
Subject: tut5.tex
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Tue, 05 Mar 96 14:46:59 -0500
From: parry@theory.lcs.mit.edu

I made the changes we discussed earlier.

Parry



0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from sparrow.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA17631; Tue, 05 Mar 96 20:53:14 EST
Received: from sparrow.lcs.mit.edu by sparrow.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA22247; Tue, 05 Mar 96 20:53:18 EST
Message-Id: <199603060153.AA22247@sparrow.lcs.mit.edu>
X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.2 7/18/95
To: 6042-teachers
Subject: problem set 4
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Tue, 05 Mar 96 20:53:18 -0500
From: kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu


I added some problems to PS4 (Hxx-Pset4.tex)

There are seven problems which I think is too many, so we can drop 4 or 6 (I 
don't think we should put both of these). If we use 6, we may put a hint in it 
to make it easier.

--Jakov



0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <miccianc@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from kingfisher.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA18121; Tue, 05 Mar 96 21:35:58 EST
From: miccianc@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Daniele Micciancio)
Received: by kingfisher.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA11378; Tue, 05 Mar 96 21:41:18 EST
Date: Tue, 05 Mar 96 21:41:18 EST
Message-Id: <199603060241.AA11378@kingfisher.lcs.mit.edu>
To: 6042-teachers
Subject: blue books


quizes answers are in my office (368).

Daniele




0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from stork.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA29730; Wed, 06 Mar 96 12:33:07 EST
From: meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Albert R. Meyer)
Received: by stork.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA05036; Wed, 06 Mar 96 12:34:04 EST
Date: Wed, 06 Mar 96 12:34:04 EST
Message-Id: <199603061734.AA05036@stork.lcs.mit.edu>
To: hartmans@mit.edu
In-Reply-To: Sam Hartman's message of Tue, 5 Mar 1996 22:35:29 -0500 <199603060335.WAA00115@hartman.mit.edu>
Subject: have a test
Cc: 6042-teachers

With minor typo corrections, I got your quiz to go thru LaTeX.

Regards, A.


0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from stork.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA01471; Wed, 06 Mar 96 13:58:06 EST
From: meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Albert R. Meyer)
Received: by stork.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA05129; Wed, 06 Mar 96 13:59:03 EST
Date: Wed, 06 Mar 96 13:59:03 EST
Message-Id: <199603061859.AA05129@stork.lcs.mit.edu>
To: 6042-teachers
Subject: freshman in course

Do we have any?  If so, we need to fill out forms:
-----------------
Date: Tue, 5 Mar 96 16:36:58 -0500
From: anneh@eecs.MIT.EDU (Anne Hunter)
To: braida@dbgrle.mit.edu, lang@mit.edu, white@rle-vlsi.mit.edu, ward@mit.edu,
        drake@mit.edu, meyer@lcs.mit.edu, wedlock@mit.edu, troxel@mit.edu,
        liskov@lcs.mit.edu
Subject: Fifth Week Flags for Freshmen
Reply-To: anneh@eecs.MIT.EDU

To Instructors of Course VI Subjects with Freshmen Registered:

We sent out a paper mailing to you last week about this new procedure,
but I want to hit some of the important points by email, as well.  We
do not yet have the updated lists and other information which will
enable you to send out the flags.

The old freshmen evaluation forms have been replaced by a system of
Fifth Week Flags for Freshman, where professors are required to give
written feedback (preferably by email) to freshmen enrolled in their
subjects who are performing at the D or F level.  Each flag should
request an immediate meeting with that student.  These meetings should
occur within a week to 10 days. 

I think you should feel free to send out flags to any freshmen whose
performance could be improved, especially those on the low side of C,
and to upperclass students who are in danger of failing.  If you send
a copy of the msg to me for Course VI students, I'll try to see that
it gets to that students' advisor.

Copies of the msg are to be sent to the students' advisors and the
UAA (these email addresses will be provided).  

The Flags are supposed to be mailed right around the end of the
fifth week, which is this Friday.

The msgs should be brief and personal, reserving substantive
points for the individual meetings.  

If you have any questions about this process, you may ask Peggy
Enders or Bonnie Walters, x3-6771.


Anne Hunter



0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <rivest@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from swan.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA07604; Wed, 06 Mar 96 18:44:42 EST
From: rivest@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Ron Rivest)
Received: by swan.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA00904; Wed, 06 Mar 96 18:44:40 EST
Date: Wed, 06 Mar 96 18:44:40 EST
Message-Id: <199603062344.AA00904@swan.lcs.mit.edu>
To: 6042-teachers
Subject: Mark Seelig


Mark Seelig came to see me today about the course.  He attended the
quiz, but didn't turn in his answers.  He is in Parry/Jakov's section.

He may or may not drop the course; he wants to continue.  He is probably
taking too many courses right now; he's not getting enough sleep and has
a number of other difficulties (e.g. financial) to deal with, so life is 
not simple.  

Please be sensitive to his situation and try to give him a little extra
assistance if necessary.  I suggested that he might make better use of
office hours.  He does have a "tutor" for the course from the department,
as of recently.

I offered that we could "grade" his quiz if he turns it in.  This would not
be for the record (his quiz grade is officially 0) but for his own guidance
in assessing how well he understands the material.  If he does this, he might
either turn in what he wrote down last night, or maybe work on it a bit more
and then turn that in...

If you have other information about how he is doing (tutorial and recitation
performance, say), please let me know as I may be talking with him further...

Thanks...

	Cheers,
	Ron



0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from sparrow.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA09971; Wed, 06 Mar 96 21:57:21 EST
Received: from sparrow.lcs.mit.edu by sparrow.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA23256; Wed, 06 Mar 96 21:57:21 EST
Message-Id: <199603070257.AA23256@sparrow.lcs.mit.edu>
X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.2 7/18/95
To: meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Albert R. Meyer)
Cc: 6042-teachers
Subject: Re: freshman in course 
In-Reply-To: Your message of Wed, 06 Mar 96 13:59:03 -0500.
             <199603061859.AA05129@stork.lcs.mit.edu> 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Wed, 06 Mar 96 21:57:20 -0500
From: kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu


> Do we have any?  If so, we need to fill out forms:

Yes, 27 according to the list from the math dept.

--Jakov



0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from sparrow.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA10410; Wed, 06 Mar 96 22:25:10 EST
Received: from sparrow.lcs.mit.edu by sparrow.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA23275; Wed, 06 Mar 96 22:25:14 EST
Message-Id: <199603070325.AA23275@sparrow.lcs.mit.edu>
X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.2 7/18/95
To: rivest@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Ron Rivest)
Cc: 6042-teachers
Subject: Re: Mark Seelig 
In-Reply-To: Your message of Wed, 06 Mar 96 18:44:40 -0500.
             <199603062344.AA00904@swan.lcs.mit.edu> 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Wed, 06 Mar 96 22:25:13 -0500
From: kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu


> 
> Mark Seelig came to see me today about the course.  He attended the
> quiz, but didn't turn in his answers.  He is in Parry/Jakov's section.
> 
[...]
> 
> If you have other information about how he is doing (tutorial and recitation
> performance, say), please let me know as I may be talking with him further...
> 

He's got 44/70 and 48/60 on first two problem sets. He has been to all 
tutorials and participated actively. He doesn't give impression he is on top 
of things, but I can't tell whether he has problems understanding the material 
or expressing himself.

--Jakov





0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from sparrow.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA10499; Wed, 06 Mar 96 22:43:57 EST
Received: from sparrow.lcs.mit.edu by sparrow.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA23343; Wed, 06 Mar 96 22:44:01 EST
Message-Id: <199603070344.AA23343@sparrow.lcs.mit.edu>
X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.2 7/18/95
To: 6042-teachers
Subject: ps 4
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Wed, 06 Mar 96 22:44:01 -0500
From: kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu


is ready (Hxx-Pset4.tex, etc.).

Please take a look at it.

Thanks,
--Jakov



0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from sparrow.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA10878; Wed, 06 Mar 96 23:20:15 EST
From: meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Albert R. Meyer)
Received: by sparrow.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA23389; Wed, 06 Mar 96 23:20:18 EST
Date: Wed, 06 Mar 96 23:20:18 EST
Message-Id: <199603070420.AA23389@sparrow.lcs.mit.edu>
To: kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu
Cc: rivest@theory.lcs.mit.edu, 6042-teachers
In-Reply-To: kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu's message of Wed, 06 Mar 96 22:25:13 -0500 <199603070325.AA23275@sparrow.lcs.mit.edu>
Subject: 6042 student

Think of email as a POSTCARD--and don't discuss individual students in it.

Regards, A.

P.S. I suggest putting such info in a krypted file in our course directory,
then send email directing readers to the file.


0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from sparrow.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA10918; Wed, 06 Mar 96 23:29:40 EST
From: meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Albert R. Meyer)
Received: by sparrow.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA23393; Wed, 06 Mar 96 23:29:43 EST
Date: Wed, 06 Mar 96 23:29:43 EST
Message-Id: <199603070429.AA23393@sparrow.lcs.mit.edu>
To: kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu
In-Reply-To: kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu's message of Wed, 06 Mar 96 22:44:01 -0500 <199603070344.AA23343@sparrow.lcs.mit.edu>
Subject: ps 4
Cc: 6042-teachers

   X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.2 7/18/95
   Date: Wed, 06 Mar 96 22:44:01 -0500
   From: kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu


   is ready (Hxx-Pset4.tex, etc.).

   Please take a look at it.

   Thanks,
   --Jakov

Meanwhile, I started editing your 8pm version.  Mine appears in the course
directory as H17-Pset4-meyer.tex.  It seemed long, so I suppressed Prob 7
(my edited full version of it is still there as a nonprinting comment).  I
leave it to you to coordinate your latest with mine and make the final
decision about which probs to include.

Regards, A. 


0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from sparrow.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA21594; Thu, 07 Mar 96 11:55:24 EST
From: meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Albert R. Meyer)
Received: by sparrow.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA23769; Thu, 07 Mar 96 11:55:28 EST
Date: Thu, 07 Mar 96 11:55:28 EST
Message-Id: <199603071655.AA23769@sparrow.lcs.mit.edu>
To: 6042-tas
Cc: rivest
Subject: Freshman, TASKS

I'd like Parryt and Andrew, who are not doing recitation this week, to be
in charge of completing and sending out the requisite 5th week evaluation
forms for Freshman in your recitation/tutorials by TOMORROW (or Modday if
necessary).  Consult with Daniele and Jakov for opinions re their
students.  Check with me or Ron if you have any questions about what is
expected.  Be sure to keep copies of the completed forms you send out.

Also, need TA's to handle:
                              CURRENT TASKS
Date due:	Task:			Name:
---------------------------------------------------------------------
3/12            ps5 soln outline        ??
3/11            ps5 draft               ??
3/11            ps4 soln                ??


Thanks, A.


1,,
Return-Path: <achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from swan.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA23925; Thu, 07 Mar 96 14:07:59 EST
From: achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Andrew Chou)
Received: by swan.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA02938; Thu, 07 Mar 96 14:07:57 EST
Date: Thu, 07 Mar 96 14:07:57 EST
Message-Id: <199603071907.AA02938@swan.lcs.mit.edu>
To: 6042-forum

*** EOOH ***
From: achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Andrew Chou)
Date: Thu, 07 Mar 96 14:07:57 EST
To: 6042-forum

To 6.042 students, 

Due to a mix-up at the beginning of the term, the schedules office did
not receive our request for a final exam time.  Therefore, we are
taking a survey of final exam schedules in order to find the most
appropriate time to schedule our final.

Please send to me (achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu -- DO NOT send to
6042-teachers, 6042-tas, or 6042-forum) the times slots you have
finals.  Use the following format, (we will count final times electronically)

For your finals, send me

DATE-TIME  
DATE-TIME  
DATE-TIME  

where date is the day MON, TUE, WED, THU, FRI and time is AM or PM

For example, if you send

MON-PM 
WED-AM 
THU-PM

I will interpret this message to mean you have 3 finals at the given
times.

Please reply as quickly as possible, as we would like to schedule our
final soon.

-- Andrew



0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from sparrow.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA27352; Thu, 07 Mar 96 17:02:58 EST
Received: from sparrow.lcs.mit.edu by sparrow.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA24295; Thu, 07 Mar 96 17:03:02 EST
Message-Id: <199603072203.AA24295@sparrow.lcs.mit.edu>
X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.2 7/18/95
To: 6042-forum
Subject: 6.042 Problem Set 4 CORRECTION
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Thu, 07 Mar 96 17:03:01 -0500
From: kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu


Hi all,

In problem 4 (on the problem set 4) you are asked to show that the sets

	[0,1) and [0,1) x [0,1)

have the same cardinality. By definition of "having same cardinality" this is 
equivalent to showing there is a bijection between the two sets.

This is possible to do, but it might be too hard. Therefore, we revised the 
problem to be as follows:

Show there is a SURJECTION from [0,1) to [0,1) x [0,1).

Regards,
6.042 teachers




0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from sparrow.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA18513; Fri, 08 Mar 96 16:33:18 EST
From: meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Albert R. Meyer)
Received: by sparrow.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA25427; Fri, 08 Mar 96 16:33:22 EST
Date: Fri, 08 Mar 96 16:33:22 EST
Message-Id: <199603082133.AA25427@sparrow.lcs.mit.edu>
To: 6042-tas
Subject: recitation notes

Please keep rec notes in Recitation directory up to date so we remember
later, and in later terms, what was covered:

3/8		recitation 5		Andrew, Jakov
3/1		recitation 4		Andrew, Parry

Thanks, A.


0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from sparrow.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA19703; Fri, 08 Mar 96 17:20:15 EST
Received: from sparrow.lcs.mit.edu by sparrow.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA25666; Fri, 08 Mar 96 17:20:19 EST
Message-Id: <199603082220.AA25666@sparrow.lcs.mit.edu>
X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.2 7/18/95
To: meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Albert R. Meyer)
Cc: 6042-tas
Subject: Re: recitation notes 
In-Reply-To: Your message of Fri, 08 Mar 96 16:33:22 -0500.
             <199603082133.AA25427@sparrow.lcs.mit.edu> 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Fri, 08 Mar 96 17:20:18 -0500
From: kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu

> Please keep rec notes in Recitation directory up to date so we remember
> later, and in later terms, what was covered:
> 
> 3/8		recitation 5		Andrew, Jakov
> 3/1		recitation 4		Andrew, Parry
> 
> Thanks, A.

done.
--Jakov



0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <miccianc@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from kingfisher.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA20473; Mon, 11 Mar 96 00:42:29 EST
From: miccianc@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Daniele Micciancio)
Received: by kingfisher.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA22980; Mon, 11 Mar 96 00:47:55 EST
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 96 00:47:55 EST
Message-Id: <199603110547.AA22980@kingfisher.lcs.mit.edu>
To: 6042-teachers
Subject: soln4


solutions to problems 1,2 and 7 of problem set 4
are in Hxx-Soln4.tex.

--Daniele


0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <miccianc@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from kingfisher.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA20785; Mon, 11 Mar 96 01:26:35 EST
From: miccianc@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Daniele Micciancio)
Received: by kingfisher.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA23053; Mon, 11 Mar 96 01:32:00 EST
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 96 01:32:00 EST
Message-Id: <199603110632.AA23053@kingfisher.lcs.mit.edu>
To: 6042-teachers
Subject: quiz solns


my solutions to problem 6 of the quiz is in file
Quiz1/p6-soln.tex together with a discussion of the 
most common errors made by the students.

--Daniele


0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from sparrow.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA03605; Mon, 11 Mar 96 11:31:09 EST
Received: from sparrow.lcs.mit.edu by sparrow.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA27833; Mon, 11 Mar 96 11:31:11 EST
Message-Id: <199603111631.AA27833@sparrow.lcs.mit.edu>
X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.2 7/18/95
To: 6042-teachers
Subject: quiz solutions
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 96 11:31:10 -0500
From: kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu


Can you please write a solution (or soulutions) to the problem you graded on 
the quiz? Can you also put in comments about common mistakes? I'll compile the 
handout for tomorrow.

Thanks,
--Jakov



0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from stork.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA03943; Mon, 11 Mar 96 11:44:00 EST
From: meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Albert R. Meyer)
Received: by stork.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA06045; Mon, 11 Mar 96 11:45:03 EST
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 96 11:45:03 EST
Message-Id: <199603111645.AA06045@stork.lcs.mit.edu>
To: miccianc@theory.lcs.mit.edu
Cc: 6042-teachers
In-Reply-To: Daniele Micciancio's message of Mon, 11 Mar 96 00:47:55 EST <199603110547.AA22980@kingfisher.lcs.mit.edu>
Subject: soln4

   From: miccianc@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Daniele Micciancio)
   Date: Mon, 11 Mar 96 00:47:55 EST


   solutions to problems 1,2 and 7 of problem set 4
   are in Hxx-Soln4.tex.

   --Daniele

my comments and corrections are in Hxx-Soln4-meyer.tex.
Regards, A.


0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from sparrow.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA16169; Mon, 11 Mar 96 23:52:29 EST
Received: from sparrow.lcs.mit.edu by sparrow.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA29047; Mon, 11 Mar 96 23:52:35 EST
Message-Id: <199603120452.AA29047@sparrow.lcs.mit.edu>
X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.2 7/18/95
To: 6042-teachers
Subject: Quiz 1 solutions
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 96 23:52:34 -0500
From: kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu


I have made up the solution for the quiz. I don't have comments for questions 
other than 2 (that I graded) and 6 (that Daniele graded).

The solutions are in Quiz1/q1-solutions.tex.

--Jakov



0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from swan.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA23821; Tue, 12 Mar 96 09:31:14 EST
From: achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Andrew Chou)
Received: by swan.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA13124; Tue, 12 Mar 96 09:31:12 EST
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 96 09:31:12 EST
Message-Id: <199603121431.AA13124@swan.lcs.mit.edu>
To: 6042-tas
Subject: Tutorial coverage

Hey guys,

Remember I'm out of town tomorrow.
So,

DANIELE has 3 hours of tutorials.
JAKOV and PARRY will cover my two hours.

Thanks,

-- Andrew


1,,
Return-Path: <achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from swan.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA23890; Tue, 12 Mar 96 09:36:27 EST
From: achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Andrew Chou)
Received: by swan.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA13133; Tue, 12 Mar 96 09:36:26 EST
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 96 09:36:26 EST
Message-Id: <199603121436.AA13133@swan.lcs.mit.edu>
To: 6042-forum
Subject: Reminder of final schedules

*** EOOH ***
From: achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Andrew Chou)
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 96 09:36:26 EST
To: 6042-forum
Subject: Reminder of final schedules

Hi everyone,

Last week, I sent out a notice asking for everyone's final schedule.
So far, about 40% of the class has  replied.  We need the other
60% to reply.  I've included a copy of the original message.

Note that you *MUST* send email to achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu
achou@mit.edu (or achou@athena.mit.edu) IS NOT ME.

-- Andrew

To 6.042 students, 

Due to a mix-up at the beginning of the term, the schedules office did
not receive our request for a final exam time.  Therefore, we are
taking a survey of final exam schedules in order to find the most
appropriate time to schedule our final.

Please send to me (achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu -- DO NOT send to
6042-teachers, 6042-tas, or 6042-forum) the times slots you have
finals.  Use the following format, (we will count final times electronically)

For your finals, send me

DATE-TIME  
DATE-TIME  
DATE-TIME  

where date is the day MON, TUE, WED, THU, FRI and time is AM or PM

For example, if you send

MON-PM 
WED-AM 
THU-PM

I will interpret this message to mean you have 3 finals at the given
times.

Please reply as quickly as possible, as we would like to schedule our
final soon.

-- Andrew



0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from sparrow.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA29294; Tue, 12 Mar 96 14:06:04 EST
Received: from sparrow.lcs.mit.edu by sparrow.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA29830; Tue, 12 Mar 96 14:06:05 EST
Message-Id: <199603121906.AA29830@sparrow.lcs.mit.edu>
X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.2 7/18/95
To: 6042-teachers
Subject: quiz 1 sols are available on teh WWW...
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 96 14:06:04 -0500
From: kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu


--Jakov



0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <miccianc@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from kingfisher.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA29666; Tue, 12 Mar 96 14:24:24 EST
From: miccianc@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Daniele Micciancio)
Received: by kingfisher.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA28461; Tue, 12 Mar 96 14:29:52 EST
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 96 14:29:52 EST
Message-Id: <199603121929.AA28461@kingfisher.lcs.mit.edu>
To: 6042-teachers
Subject: tut5 p2


Problem 2 for tomorrow's tutorial is 
in Tutorial/tut5-p2.tex

--Daniele


0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from sparrow.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA04218; Tue, 12 Mar 96 18:21:58 EST
Received: from sparrow.lcs.mit.edu by sparrow.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA00319; Tue, 12 Mar 96 18:22:02 EST
Message-Id: <199603122322.AA00319@sparrow.lcs.mit.edu>
X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.2 7/18/95
To: 6042-teachers
Subject: tutorial #5 problem one...
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 96 18:22:02 -0500
From: kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu


is in Tutorials/tut5-p1.{tex,ps.crypt}. Both files are krypt-ed.

--Jakov



0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <miccianc@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from kingfisher.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA12918; Wed, 13 Mar 96 06:20:37 EST
From: miccianc@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Daniele Micciancio)
Received: by kingfisher.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA29856; Wed, 13 Mar 96 06:26:00 EST
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 96 06:26:00 EST
Message-Id: <199603131126.AA29856@kingfisher.lcs.mit.edu>
To: 6042-teachers
Subject: tut5


Both problems of tutorial 5 are now in tut5.{tex,ps} (krypted)

--Daniele


0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from kingfisher.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA29197; Thu, 14 Mar 96 02:12:45 EST
From: achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Andrew Chou)
Received: by kingfisher.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA01966; Thu, 14 Mar 96 02:18:14 EST
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 96 02:18:14 EST
Message-Id: <199603140718.AA01966@kingfisher.lcs.mit.edu>
To: 6042-teachers
Subject: Final schedules (results so far)

I have about 60 responses -- a little over half the class.
The breakdown is as follows: (number of finals per time period)

MON AM	7
MON PM	8

TUE AM	23
TUE PM	23

WED AM	26
WED PM	2

THU AM	5
THU PM	10
	
FRI AM	0
FRI PM	7

So, let's go with FRI-AM and maybe schedule a make-up WED PM.
I think 50% is probably a big enough sample.

BTW, many of these students have serious problems following simple
directions.

-- Andrew


0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <parry@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from sparrow.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA04488; Thu, 14 Mar 96 07:34:48 EST
Received: from sparrow.lcs.mit.edu by sparrow.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA01896; Thu, 14 Mar 96 07:34:52 EST
Message-Id: <199603141234.AA01896@sparrow.lcs.mit.edu>
To: 6042-teachers
Subject: PS5
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 96 07:34:52 -0500
From: parry@theory.lcs.mit.edu

I added a couple of problems to the draft in the course directory.  It seems
like we're one (graph) problem short.  Any suggestions?

Parry



0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <rivest@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from swan.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA05415; Thu, 14 Mar 96 09:00:49 EST
From: rivest@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Ron Rivest)
Received: by swan.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA17150; Thu, 14 Mar 96 09:00:49 EST
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 96 09:00:49 EST
Message-Id: <199603141400.AA17150@swan.lcs.mit.edu>
To: 6042-tas
Subject: Notes


I'll not be attending class today, but I would greatly appreciate it if one
of you could "take notes" for me for the class.  I'd like to have a record
of what was covered.  (Doesn't need to be very detailed; I usually end up
with about 2 pages of notes for the class...)

	Thanks!

	Ron Rivest


0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <rivest@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from swan.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA05692; Thu, 14 Mar 96 09:19:48 EST
From: rivest@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Ron Rivest)
Received: by swan.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA17201; Thu, 14 Mar 96 09:19:47 EST
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 96 09:19:47 EST
Message-Id: <199603141419.AA17201@swan.lcs.mit.edu>
To: parry@theory.lcs.mit.edu
Cc: 6042-teachers
Subject: PS5 suggestion


Perhaps problem 29 on page 472 of the text...?

	Cheers,
	Ron



0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from sparrow.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA06502; Thu, 14 Mar 96 09:55:36 EST
From: meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Albert R. Meyer)
Received: by sparrow.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA01964; Thu, 14 Mar 96 09:55:40 EST
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 96 09:55:40 EST
Message-Id: <199603141455.AA01964@sparrow.lcs.mit.edu>
To: rivest@theory.lcs.mit.edu
Cc: parry@theory.lcs.mit.edu, 6042-teachers
In-Reply-To: Ron Rivest's message of Thu, 14 Mar 96 09:19:47 EST <199603141419.AA17201@swan.lcs.mit.edu>
Subject: PS5 suggestion

   From: rivest@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Ron Rivest)
   Date: Thu, 14 Mar 96 09:19:47 EST


   Perhaps problem 29 on page 472 of the text...?

           Cheers,
           Ron


No good: It's ODD-numbered.
Regards, A.


0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from sparrow.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA06542; Thu, 14 Mar 96 09:56:59 EST
From: meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Albert R. Meyer)
Received: by sparrow.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA01967; Thu, 14 Mar 96 09:57:04 EST
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 96 09:57:04 EST
Message-Id: <199603141457.AA01967@sparrow.lcs.mit.edu>
To: achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu
Cc: 6042-teachers
In-Reply-To: Andrew Chou's message of Thu, 14 Mar 96 02:18:14 EST <199603140718.AA01966@kingfisher.lcs.mit.edu>
Subject: Final schedules (results so far)

   From: achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Andrew Chou)
   Date: Thu, 14 Mar 96 02:18:14 EST

   I have about 60 responses -- a little over half the class.
   The breakdown is as follows: (number of finals per time period)

   MON AM	7
   MON PM	8

   TUE AM	23
   TUE PM	23

   WED AM	26
   WED PM	2

   THU AM	5
   THU PM	10

   FRI AM	0
   FRI PM	7

   So, let's go with FRI-AM and maybe schedule a make-up WED PM.
   I think 50% is probably a big enough sample.

   BTW, many of these students have serious problems following simple
   directions.

   -- Andrew

OK, confirm FRI-AM with registrar and then broadcast to forum, get
announced in lecture or recitation.

Thanks, A.


0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from kingfisher.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA06640; Thu, 14 Mar 96 10:01:08 EST
From: achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Andrew Chou)
Received: by kingfisher.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA02686; Thu, 14 Mar 96 10:06:37 EST
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 96 10:06:37 EST
Message-Id: <199603141506.AA02686@kingfisher.lcs.mit.edu>
To: rivest@theory.lcs.mit.edu
Cc: 6042-tas
In-Reply-To: Ron Rivest's message of Thu, 14 Mar 96 09:00:49 EST <199603141400.AA17150@swan.lcs.mit.edu>
Subject: Notes

Ron,

I'd be glad to take notes.

-- Andrew


0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <miccianc@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from kingfisher.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA06860; Thu, 14 Mar 96 10:12:08 EST
From: miccianc@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Daniele Micciancio)
Received: by kingfisher.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA02724; Thu, 14 Mar 96 10:17:38 EST
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 96 10:17:38 EST
Message-Id: <199603141517.AA02724@kingfisher.lcs.mit.edu>
To: 6042-teachers


A draft of the problem set is in H19...
(the picture does not latex yet, 
I am still trying to fix it).
I rephrased the problem suggested by Ron.
I think we have enough problems now.
See if we should give more or less hints and/or extra credit.

--Daniele



0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from sparrow.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA07963; Thu, 14 Mar 96 11:06:04 EST
From: meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Albert R. Meyer)
Received: by sparrow.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA02051; Thu, 14 Mar 96 11:06:08 EST
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 96 11:06:08 EST
Message-Id: <199603141606.AA02051@sparrow.lcs.mit.edu>
To: miccianc@theory.lcs.mit.edu
In-Reply-To: Daniele Micciancio's message of Thu, 14 Mar 96 10:17:38 EST <199603141517.AA02724@kingfisher.lcs.mit.edu>
Subject: ps5
Cc: 6042-teachers

See my revisions of your 9am version in H19-Pset5-meyer.tex.  Give me call
at home at 332-8194.

Regards, A.


0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <miccianc@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from kingfisher.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA09795; Thu, 14 Mar 96 12:30:49 EST
From: miccianc@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Daniele Micciancio)
Received: by kingfisher.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA03109; Thu, 14 Mar 96 12:36:18 EST
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 96 12:36:18 EST
Message-Id: <199603141736.AA03109@kingfisher.lcs.mit.edu>
To: 6042-teachers
Subject: ps5


Final draft of problem set 5 is in H19-Pset5.tex.

--Daniele


0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from sparrow.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA02267; Fri, 15 Mar 96 14:48:45 EST
Received: from sparrow.lcs.mit.edu by sparrow.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA04095; Fri, 15 Mar 96 14:48:49 EST
Message-Id: <199603151948.AA04095@sparrow.lcs.mit.edu>
X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.2 7/18/95
To: 6042-tas
Subject: 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Fri, 15 Mar 96 14:48:49 -0500
From: kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu


------- Forwarded Message

Return-Path: MAILER-DAEMON@theory.lcs.mit.edu
Return-Path: <MAILER-DAEMON@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA02242; Fri, 15 Mar 96 14:47:54 EST
Date: Fri, 15 Mar 96 14:47:54 EST
From: MAILER-DAEMON@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Mail Delivery Subsystem)
Subject: Returned mail: Host unknown
Message-Id: <199603151947.AA02242@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
To: kucan

   ----- Transcript of session follows -----
550 theory.lcs (tcp)... 550 Host unknown
554 <6042-tas@theory.lcs>... 550 Host unknown (Authoritative answer from name 
server)

   ----- Unsent message follows -----
Return-Path: <kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from sparrow.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA02240; Fri, 15 Mar 96 14:47:54 EST
Received: from sparrow.lcs.mit.edu by sparrow.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA04081; Fri, 15 Mar 96 14:47:58 EST
Message-Id: <199603151947.AA04081@sparrow.lcs.mit.edu>
X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.2 7/18/95
To: Timothy Chien <tchien@MIT.EDU>
Cc: 6042-tas@theory.lcs
Subject: Re: add me to 6042-students 
In-Reply-To: Your message of Fri, 15 Mar 96 14:41:33 -0500.
             <9603151941.AA09065@m38-370-2.MIT.EDU> 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Fri, 15 Mar 96 14:47:58 -0500
From: kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu

> i haven't been receiving mail addressed to 6042-students
> and i am taking the class..thanks..
> 
> 
> 
> --tim

I have added you to the 6042-forum mailing list

- --Jakov


------- End of Forwarded Message




0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from sparrow.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA15088; Sat, 16 Mar 96 12:26:54 EST
From: meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Albert R. Meyer)
Received: by sparrow.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA04654; Sat, 16 Mar 96 12:26:58 EST
Date: Sat, 16 Mar 96 12:26:58 EST
Message-Id: <199603161726.AA04654@sparrow.lcs.mit.edu>
To: 6042-tas
Subject: [jessek@mindcrime.mit.edu: Quiz One]

FYI:

Date: Fri, 15 Mar 1996 15:13:34 -0500
From: Jesse Kornblum <jessek@mindcrime.mit.edu>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.0 (X11; I; Linux 1.2.13 i586)
To: 6042-lecturers@theory.lcs.mit.edu
Subject: Quiz One

Two things:

The quiz solutions handout (quiz-sols-1.ps) does not print on
Athena.

Secondly, I feel that the quiz was too difficult. I feel that 
although the basis for some of the questions was covered in
the lectures and the text, that some of the methods of proving
concepts were not.

Yours truly,
-- 
Jesse Kornblum
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
403 Memorial Drive  - DKE        |  If cryptography is outlawed, seYq  
Cambridge, MA 02139-4397  USA    |     Yhwls8x Nwoj Gtwu 63gsJJqh!
Phone: 617-494-5419       http://web.mit.edu/jessek/www/home.html



0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from sparrow.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA15293; Sat, 16 Mar 96 12:54:14 EST
From: meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Albert R. Meyer)
Received: by sparrow.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA04682; Sat, 16 Mar 96 12:54:18 EST
Date: Sat, 16 Mar 96 12:54:18 EST
Message-Id: <199603161754.AA04682@sparrow.lcs.mit.edu>
To: jessek@mindcrime.mit.edu
Cc: 6042-teachers@theory.lcs.mit.edu
In-Reply-To: Jesse Kornblum's message of Fri, 15 Mar 1996 15:13:34 -0500 <3149CF6E.52002409@mindcrime.mit.edu>
Subject: Quiz One

   Sender: jessek@mindcrime.mit.edu
   Date: Fri, 15 Mar 1996 15:13:34 -0500
   From: Jesse Kornblum <jessek@mindcrime.mit.edu>
   X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.0 (X11; I; Linux 1.2.13 i586)
   X-Url: ftp://theory.lcs.mit.edu/pub/classes/6.042/homepage.html

   Two things:

   The quiz solutions handout (quiz-sols-1.ps) does not print on
   Athena.
FIle name in course directory on theory.lcs.mit.edu and on web page is
"H18-Q1Sols.ps".  If you have trouble linking to, or printing, that file
on athena, let me know.

   Secondly, I feel that the quiz was too difficult. I feel that 
   although the basis for some of the questions was covered in
   the lectures and the text, that some of the methods of proving
   concepts were not.

The statistics--mean and median in mid-50's--support your view that
the quiz was harder than desirable.  But I looked over the solutions again
just now, and except for the last problem (on length of longest chain in
an unfamiliar poset), I confess that I still don't see where they demand
more knowledge or insight than was offered in class and psets.  Maybe you
could help me out: I'd be pleased to hear further particulars from you of
which "methods of proving concepts" you felt were not covered adequately
prior to the quiz.

   Yours truly,
   -- 
   Jesse Kornblum
   ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   403 Memorial Drive  - DKE        |  If cryptography is outlawed, seYq  
   Cambridge, MA 02139-4397  USA    |     Yhwls8x Nwoj Gtwu 63gsJJqh!
   Phone: 617-494-5419       http://web.mit.edu/jessek/www/home.html


Regards,
Albert R. Meyer


0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from sparrow.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA15552; Sat, 16 Mar 96 13:21:13 EST
From: meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Albert R. Meyer)
Received: by sparrow.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA04697; Sat, 16 Mar 96 13:21:17 EST
Date: Sat, 16 Mar 96 13:21:17 EST
Message-Id: <199603161821.AA04697@sparrow.lcs.mit.edu>
To: miccianc
Subject: tut6
Cc: 6042-tas

I can't get my version in Tutorials/H22-tut6.tex OR your version in the
handouts directory to run through LaTeX.  Also, it looks like the version
in the handouts directory did not include the correction of the bug you
said was discovered in tutorial, nor did it include my revisions in
Tutorials/H22....  Hope you can straighten this out.

I have several corrections/revisions for PS4-soln's.  Where is the latest
draft?

Regards, A.


0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from kingfisher.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA16571; Sat, 16 Mar 96 16:10:02 EST
From: achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Andrew Chou)
Received: by kingfisher.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA06765; Sat, 16 Mar 96 16:15:33 EST
Date: Sat, 16 Mar 96 16:15:33 EST
Message-Id: <199603162115.AA06765@kingfisher.lcs.mit.edu>
To: dhermann@mit.edu
Cc: 6042-teachers, anneh@eecs.MIT.EDU
Subject: 6042 freshman flag

Dear Daniel,

Based upon your current progress in 6.042, you are in danger of
receiving an unsatisfactory grade.  According to institute regulations
regarding freshman, we are warning you of this possibility.

Please discuss your situation with your TA, or arrange a meeting
with one of the lecturers.

Andrew Chou
6.042 TA



0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from kingfisher.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA16585; Sat, 16 Mar 96 16:11:11 EST
From: achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Andrew Chou)
Received: by kingfisher.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA06769; Sat, 16 Mar 96 16:16:42 EST
Date: Sat, 16 Mar 96 16:16:42 EST
Message-Id: <199603162116.AA06769@kingfisher.lcs.mit.edu>
To: jingq@mit.edu
Cc: 6042-teachers, anneh@eecs.MIT.EDU
Subject: 6042 freshman flag

Dear Jing,

Based upon your current progress in 6.042, you are in danger of
receiving an unsatisfactory grade.  According to institute regulations
regarding freshman, we are warning you of this possibility.

Please discuss your situation with your TA, or arrange a meeting
with one of the lecturers.

Andrew Chou
6.042 TA


0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from kingfisher.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA16698; Sat, 16 Mar 96 16:15:18 EST
From: achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Andrew Chou)
Received: by kingfisher.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA06775; Sat, 16 Mar 96 16:20:49 EST
Date: Sat, 16 Mar 96 16:20:49 EST
Message-Id: <199603162120.AA06775@kingfisher.lcs.mit.edu>
To: 6042-teachers
Subject: Freshman flags


I flagged two freshman.  Daniel Hermann and Jing Qian.
FYI, their current grades are as follows:

		PS	Tut	Q1	Tot
Hermann		9	100	50	53
Qian		77	80	28	62

Hermann doesn't do any of the homework and did below average on the
quiz.

Qian did very poorly on Q1, so that's why he's in trouble.

-- Andrew


0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <miccianc@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from woodpecker.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA26403; Sun, 17 Mar 96 11:55:05 EST
From: miccianc@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Daniele Micciancio)
Received: by woodpecker.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA02169; Sun, 17 Mar 96 11:57:30 EST
Date: Sun, 17 Mar 96 11:57:30 EST
Message-Id: <199603171657.AA02169@woodpecker.lcs.mit.edu>
To: achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu
In-Reply-To: Andrew Chou's message of Sun, 17 Mar 96 11:34:33 EST <199603171634.AA07077@kingfisher.lcs.mit.edu>
Subject: [bothwell@MIT.EDU: Solutions]
Cc: 6042-teachers


I added to H21-Soln4.tex a short explanation about
problem 6 as you suggested. 
The new version is in H21-Soln4-later.tex.
But now it doesn't fit 4 pages anymore, but I cannot 
work on the layout from here because I cannot
preview or print.
I'll go to MIT soon to work it out.

--Daniele


0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from sparrow.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA26743; Sun, 17 Mar 96 12:35:10 EST
From: meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Albert R. Meyer)
Received: by sparrow.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA05185; Sun, 17 Mar 96 12:35:15 EST
Date: Sun, 17 Mar 96 12:35:15 EST
Message-Id: <199603171735.AA05185@sparrow.lcs.mit.edu>
To: jones
Subject: LaTeX 
Cc: 6042-teachers

Can you fix LaTeX incompatibility between me and micciancio (and other
ta's?).  He can run H22-tut6.tex in the public handouts directory and I
can't.

Thanks, A. 


0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from sparrow.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA26786; Sun, 17 Mar 96 12:44:54 EST
From: meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Albert R. Meyer)
Received: by sparrow.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA05204; Sun, 17 Mar 96 12:44:58 EST
Date: Sun, 17 Mar 96 12:44:58 EST
Message-Id: <199603171744.AA05204@sparrow.lcs.mit.edu>
To: jessek@mit.edu
In-Reply-To: Jesse Kornblum's message of Sun, 17 Mar 1996 12:10:26 -0500 (EST) <Pine.LNX.3.91.960317115324.128B-100000@mindcrime.mit.edu>
Subject: Quiz One

   Date: Sun, 17 Mar 1996 12:10:26 -0500 (EST)
   From: Jesse Kornblum <jessek@mit.edu>

   On Sat, 16 Mar 1996, Albert R. Meyer wrote:

   > FIle name in course directory on theory.lcs.mit.edu and on web page is
   > "H18-Q1Sols.ps".  If you have trouble linking to, or printing, that file
   > on athena, let me know.

   Sorry I got the filename wrong. I have the quiz solutions, but the quiz
   statistics doesn't print on Athena. (quiz-1-stats.ps) I also had 
   problems viewing it with Ghostview. (When trying to print, all I got
   was the burst page)

   > an unfamiliar poset), I confess that I still don't see where they demand
   > more knowledge or insight than was offered in class and psets.  Maybe you
   > could help me out: I'd be pleased to hear further particulars from you of
   > which "methods of proving concepts" you felt were not covered adequately
   > prior to the quiz.

   I was completely bewildered by question number four on the test, and, to
   be honest, I don't understand the solution, and will be going to my TA's
   office hours again this week. I don't claim to be one of the best 
   students in the class, but it worries me that I can't make heads or
   tails of the solutions.

   Jesse Kornblum
   ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   403 Memorial Drive  - DKE        |  If cryptography is outlawed, seYq  
   Cambridge, MA 02139-4397  USA    |     Yhwls8x Nwoj Gtwu 63gsJJqh!
   Phone: 617-494-5419       http://web.mit.edu/jessek/www/home.html



Regret that prob4 was/is bewildering.  Good idea to consult with your TA.

Q1, prob4 was meant to be an easy variation on PSet2, prob2; did you
understand that problem?

Thanks for the info.  Let me know if I can be of help.

Regards, A.


0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from sparrow.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA27218; Sun, 17 Mar 96 13:33:47 EST
Received: from sparrow.lcs.mit.edu by sparrow.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA05358; Sun, 17 Mar 96 13:33:51 EST
Message-Id: <199603171833.AA05358@sparrow.lcs.mit.edu>
X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.2 7/18/95
To: 6042-teachers
Subject: Re: freshmen flags
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Sun, 17 Mar 96 13:33:51 -0500
From: kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu


Just to keep you informed...

I have recieved the following form a student that has been flaged. I replied 
and offered him some extra help.

--jakov


------- Forwarded Message

Return-Path: dhermann@MIT.EDU
Return-Path: <dhermann@MIT.EDU>
Received: from MIT.EDU (SOUTH-STATION-ANNEX.MIT.EDU) by theory.lcs.mit.edu 
(5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA14326; Thu, 14 Mar 96 16:17:47 EST
Received: from M4-035-10.MIT.EDU by MIT.EDU with SMTP
	id AA08772; Thu, 14 Mar 96 16:17:03 EST
From: dhermann@MIT.EDU
Received: by m4-035-10.MIT.EDU (931110.SGI/4.7) id AA02867; Thu, 14 Mar 96 
16:17:47 -0500
Message-Id: <9603142117.AA02867@m4-035-10.MIT.EDU>
To: kucan@theory.lcs
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 1996 16:17:46 EST

As my quiz and problem set grades show, I'm not grasping very much of the
material covered so far in class.  I think a few long office hours or
something to that effect would really help.  Would you suggest that I try
to set up a time with you or one of the other TA's or look into the course
6 tutoring program or what?  

>From looking at the syllabus, it appears that the rest of the material 
covered in the course will be probability/statistics stuff which I find
much more intuitive in which case I shouldn't need nearly as much help
as I do with the beginning material.

Let me know what you think I should do as I really need to do some
catching up.

daniel


------- End of Forwarded Message




0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from sparrow.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA27413; Sun, 17 Mar 96 13:49:11 EST
From: meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Albert R. Meyer)
Received: by sparrow.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA05402; Sun, 17 Mar 96 13:49:15 EST
Date: Sun, 17 Mar 96 13:49:15 EST
Message-Id: <199603171849.AA05402@sparrow.lcs.mit.edu>
To: achou
Cc: 6042-teachers
Subject: ps5-soln

I encrypted your draft amnd backup files with course key.

Regards, A.


0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <miccianc@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from kingfisher.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA29534; Sun, 17 Mar 96 17:24:00 EST
From: miccianc@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Daniele Micciancio)
Received: by kingfisher.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA07252; Sun, 17 Mar 96 17:29:33 EST
Date: Sun, 17 Mar 96 17:29:33 EST
Message-Id: <199603172229.AA07252@kingfisher.lcs.mit.edu>
To: 6042-teachers
Subject: ps4soln



Last draft of PS4 solutions is in 

H21-Soln4-later.tex

Changes from the previous version are 
enclosed in 

%%NEW {
%%} NEW

--Daniele




0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <rivest@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from swan.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA16887; Mon, 18 Mar 96 14:47:29 EST
From: rivest@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Ron Rivest)
Received: by swan.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA25366; Mon, 18 Mar 96 14:47:28 EST
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 96 14:47:28 EST
Message-Id: <199603181947.AA25366@swan.lcs.mit.edu>
To: 6042-teachers
Subject: Tomorrow's staff mtg


I propose that we start our staff meetings at 10:30 from now on
(starting tomorrow), because we have tended to overrun our allotted
hour.  So, let's try it.  Let me know if this is awkward or impossible
for you, and we can consider alternatives, but I'll be there tomorrow
at 10:30 in 308, and if you need to come late, so be it...

	Cheers,
	Ron



0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <miccianc@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from kingfisher.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA19572; Mon, 18 Mar 96 16:50:51 EST
From: miccianc@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Daniele Micciancio)
Received: by kingfisher.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA08829; Mon, 18 Mar 96 16:56:25 EST
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 96 16:56:25 EST
Message-Id: <199603182156.AA08829@kingfisher.lcs.mit.edu>
To: rivest@theory.lcs.mit.edu
In-Reply-To: <199603181947.AA25366@swan.lcs.mit.edu> (rivest@theory.lcs.mit.edu)
Subject: Re: Tomorrow's staff mtg
Cc: 6042-teachers


> I propose that we start our staff meetings at 10:30 from now on
> (starting tomorrow), because we have tended to overrun our allotted
> hour.  So, let's try it.  Let me know if this is awkward or impossible
> for you, and we can consider alternatives, but I'll be there tomorrow
> at 10:30 in 308, and if you need to come late, so be it...
>
> 	Cheers,
> 	Ron


I'll be there at 10:30.

--Daniele





0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from sparrow.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA24328; Mon, 18 Mar 96 22:35:35 EST
Received: from sparrow.lcs.mit.edu by sparrow.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA07140; Mon, 18 Mar 96 22:35:40 EST
Message-Id: <199603190335.AA07140@sparrow.lcs.mit.edu>
X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.2 7/18/95
To: 6042-teachers
Subject: ps 5 solutions
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 96 22:35:39 -0500
From: kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu


are ready in the class directory...

all pieces are krypt-ed!

--Jakov



0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <rivest@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from swan.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA02882; Tue, 19 Mar 96 10:29:14 EST
From: rivest@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Ron Rivest)
Received: by swan.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA27066; Tue, 19 Mar 96 10:29:14 EST
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 96 10:29:14 EST
Message-Id: <199603191529.AA27066@swan.lcs.mit.edu>
To: 6042-teachers
Subject: Staff meeting is in my office -- Ron





0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from sparrow.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA11394; Tue, 19 Mar 96 17:12:30 EST
Received: from sparrow.lcs.mit.edu by sparrow.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA07863; Tue, 19 Mar 96 17:12:34 EST
Message-Id: <199603192212.AA07863@sparrow.lcs.mit.edu>
X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.2 7/18/95
To: 6042-teachers
Subject: tutorial #7 is ready
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 96 17:12:34 -0500
From: kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu


as Hxx-tut7.* in Tutorials directory (all is encrypted)

--Jakov



1,,
Return-Path: <meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from sparrow.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA15921; Tue, 19 Mar 96 22:46:53 EST
From: meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Albert R. Meyer)
Received: by sparrow.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA08228; Tue, 19 Mar 96 22:46:58 EST
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 96 22:46:58 EST
Message-Id: <199603200346.AA08228@sparrow.lcs.mit.edu>
To: kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu
In-Reply-To: kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu's message of Tue, 19 Mar 96 17:12:34 -0500 <199603192212.AA07863@sparrow.lcs.mit.edu>
Subject: tutorial #7 is ready
Cc: 6042-teachers

*** EOOH ***
From: meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Albert R. Meyer)
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 96 22:46:58 EST
To: kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu
In-Reply-To: kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu's message of Tue, 19 Mar 96 17:12:34 -0500 <199603192212.AA07863@sparrow.lcs.mit.edu>
Subject: tutorial #7 is ready
Cc: 6042-teachers

   X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.2 7/18/95
   Date: Tue, 19 Mar 96 17:12:34 -0500
   From: kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu


   as Hxx-tut7.* in Tutorials directory (all is encrypted)

   --Jakov


My edited version is in H24-tut7-meyer.tex

Regards, A.


1,,
Return-Path: <kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from sparrow.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA17188; Wed, 20 Mar 96 00:57:51 EST
Received: from sparrow.lcs.mit.edu by sparrow.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA08354; Wed, 20 Mar 96 00:57:56 EST
Message-Id: <199603200557.AA08354@sparrow.lcs.mit.edu>
X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.2 7/18/95
To: 6042-tas
Subject: tutorial 7
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 96 00:57:55 -0500
From: kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu

*** EOOH ***
X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.2 7/18/95
To: 6042-tas
Subject: tutorial 7
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 96 00:57:55 -0500
From: kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu


make sure you use the latest version tomorrow in tutorials (see below)
--Jakov

------- Forwarded Message

[...]
From: meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Albert R. Meyer)
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 96 22:46:58 EST
To: kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu
Subject: tutorial #7 is ready
Cc: 6042-teachers

   X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.2 7/18/95
   Date: Tue, 19 Mar 96 17:12:34 -0500
   From: kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu


   as Hxx-tut7.* in Tutorials directory (all is encrypted)

   --Jakov


My edited version is in H24-tut7-meyer.tex

Regards, A.

------- End of Forwarded Message




0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from sparrow.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA01220; Wed, 20 Mar 96 16:02:11 EST
Received: from sparrow.lcs.mit.edu by sparrow.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA09069; Wed, 20 Mar 96 16:02:16 EST
Message-Id: <199603202102.AA09069@sparrow.lcs.mit.edu>
X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.2 7/18/95
To: jevans@MIT.EDU
Cc: 6042-teachers
Subject: 6.042 status...
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 96 16:02:15 -0500
From: kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu


According to registrar's data, you are registred for the course, but our 
records indicate that you havn't been attending the tutorials and turning in 
homeworks recently.

If you are still attending the class, you should be aware that tutorials and 
homeworks are a significant part of the grade for this course (see course 
information handout).

Regards,
--Jakov




0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from sparrow.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA01364; Wed, 20 Mar 96 16:06:06 EST
Received: from sparrow.lcs.mit.edu by sparrow.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA09085; Wed, 20 Mar 96 16:06:11 EST
Message-Id: <199603202106.AA09085@sparrow.lcs.mit.edu>
X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.2 7/18/95
To: julian@MIT.EDU
Cc: 6042-teachers
Subject: 6.042-status...
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 96 16:06:10 -0500
From: kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu


According to the registrar's data, you are still registred for the course, but 
our records show no sign of you in the class, so I assume you were planning to 
drop the course.

If this is so, make sure you notify the registrar. If you are planning to take 
the course please let us know as soon as possible.

Regards,
--Jakov




0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from sparrow.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA01428; Wed, 20 Mar 96 16:12:20 EST
Received: from sparrow.lcs.mit.edu by sparrow.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA09113; Wed, 20 Mar 96 16:12:25 EST
Message-Id: <199603202112.AA09113@sparrow.lcs.mit.edu>
X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.2 7/18/95
To: karianne@MIT.EDU
Cc: 6042-teachers
Subject: 6.042 status...
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 96 16:12:24 -0500
From: kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu



According to registrar's data, you are registred for the course, but our 
records indicate that you havn't turned in the quiz, and haven't come to last 
couple of tutorials and haven't turned in last problem set.

Please let us know if you are still planning to attend the course, or 
otherwise notify the registrar.

Regards,
--Jakov






0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from sparrow.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA01605; Wed, 20 Mar 96 16:15:44 EST
Received: from sparrow.lcs.mit.edu by sparrow.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA09128; Wed, 20 Mar 96 16:15:49 EST
Message-Id: <199603202115.AA09128@sparrow.lcs.mit.edu>
X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.2 7/18/95
To: seelig@mit.edu
Cc: 6042-teachers
Subject: 6.042 status...
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 96 16:15:48 -0500
From: kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu


According to registrar's data, you are NOT registred for the course, but our 
records indicate that you have been attending the course. If you are taking 
the course for credit, make sure you add the course.

Regards,
--Jakov







0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from swan.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA02594; Wed, 20 Mar 96 16:58:26 EST
From: achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Andrew Chou)
Received: by swan.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA29785; Wed, 20 Mar 96 16:58:26 EST
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 96 16:58:26 EST
Message-Id: <199603202158.AA29785@swan.lcs.mit.edu>
To: 6042-teachers
Subject: Pset 6


Pset 6 draft is done.  Please take a look.

Also, can someone tell which section are for the readings?

-- Andrew


0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from swan.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA02641; Wed, 20 Mar 96 17:01:25 EST
From: achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Andrew Chou)
Received: by swan.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA29807; Wed, 20 Mar 96 17:01:23 EST
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 96 17:01:23 EST
Message-Id: <199603202201.AA29807@swan.lcs.mit.edu>
To: jstipins@MIT.EDU
Cc: 6042-teachers


According to registrar's data, you are NOT registred for the course, but our 
records indicate that you have been attending the course. If you are taking 
the course for credit, make sure you add the course.

Regards,
--Andrew



0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <rivest@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from swan.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA02846; Wed, 20 Mar 96 17:14:47 EST
From: rivest@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Ron Rivest)
Received: by swan.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA29852; Wed, 20 Mar 96 17:14:46 EST
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 96 17:14:46 EST
Message-Id: <199603202214.AA29852@swan.lcs.mit.edu>
To: 6042-teachers
Subject: [achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu: Pset 6]


Some minor typos; please stop by my office...

No new readings for Thursday.  

Ask Albert about the following week...

	Cheers,
	Ron


Return-Path: <achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
From: achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Andrew Chou)
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 96 16:58:26 EST
To: 6042-teachers
Subject: Pset 6


Pset 6 draft is done.  Please take a look.

Also, can someone tell which section are for the readings?

-- Andrew



0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from swan.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA03288; Wed, 20 Mar 96 17:34:17 EST
From: achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Andrew Chou)
Received: by swan.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA29899; Wed, 20 Mar 96 17:34:16 EST
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 96 17:34:16 EST
Message-Id: <199603202234.AA29899@swan.lcs.mit.edu>
To: 6042-teachers
Subject: [jstipins@MIT.EDU: ]

FYI: 

Return-Path: <jstipins@MIT.EDU>
From: jstipins@MIT.EDU
To: achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Andrew Chou)
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 20 Mar 1996 17:01:23 EST."
             <199603202201.AA29807@swan.lcs.mit.edu> 
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 1996 17:19:17 EST

Andrew,

Yes, I will register as soon as my financial aid problems get
settled, which should be sometime in the very near future.

Thanks,
-Janis



0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <miccianc@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from kingfisher.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA05337; Wed, 20 Mar 96 19:41:14 EST
From: miccianc@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Daniele Micciancio)
Received: by kingfisher.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA15391; Wed, 20 Mar 96 19:46:51 EST
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 96 19:46:51 EST
Message-Id: <199603210046.AA15391@kingfisher.lcs.mit.edu>
To: 6042-teachers
Subject: ps6


in problem 2 part (b),

	O(f(n)) \neq f(O(n))

All functions in f(O(n)) are necessarily bounded by f(0).
Functions in O(f(n)) may take arbitrarily large values.
Is that the intended solution or it is a bug in the problem?

--Daniele



0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from sparrow.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA07529; Wed, 20 Mar 96 23:21:38 EST
From: meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Albert R. Meyer)
Received: by sparrow.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA09817; Wed, 20 Mar 96 23:21:43 EST
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 96 23:21:43 EST
Message-Id: <199603210421.AA09817@sparrow.lcs.mit.edu>
To: achou
Cc: 6042-teachers
In-Reply-To: Daniele Micciancio's message of Wed, 20 Mar 96 19:46:51 EST <199603210046.AA15391@kingfisher.lcs.mit.edu>
Subject: ps6

   From: miccianc@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Daniele Micciancio)
   Date: Wed, 20 Mar 96 19:46:51 EST


   in problem 2 part (b),

           O(f(n)) \neq f(O(n))

   All functions in f(O(n)) are necessarily bounded by f(0).
   Functions in O(f(n)) may take arbitrarily large values.
   Is that the intended solution or it is a bug in the problem?

   --Daniele

I can't make much sense of 2b and think we should cut it:

   What is the type of f?  It can't be N-->N since there are NO strictly
   decreasing functions of this type.  If it is N-->R+, such as f(n) =
   1/(n+1), then f(O(n)) is ill-defined: for then f(n) = O(n), but (f(f(n))
   is ill-typed since the range of f is not contained in the domain of f.  If
   f:R+-->R+, then n = f(f(n)) is in f(O(n)) and is not bounded by f(0).
   Even wierder things happen in this case, and I don't think we want to
   study it.

Instead, just use 2a, made a bit more interesting:
   Prove or disprove:
                         2^theta(n) = theta(2^n)

Preface of prob 2 is awkwardly written.  I suggest replacing it with
repetition of the phrasing from tut7 prob 1:

   In class we defined $f = O(g)$ as a relation between functions $f\mbox{
   and }g:\nats \to \nats$.  We now define $O(g)$ to be the {\em set} of $f$
   such that $f = O(g)$.  Similarly for $\Theta(g)$.  More generally, we
   define $h(O(g))$ to be the set of functions:
   \[ h(O(g)) ::= \{\,h(f(n)) \mid f(n) = O(g(n))\}.  \]
   Similarly for $h(\Theta(g))$.



                          MORE COMMENTS ON PS6:

                                 READING

Reading for this assignment: Rosen 5.1-3; Handout 23: Chapters 2--4 of CLR
        Text.
Reading for next week of lectures: Rosen 4.1, 4.3, 4.6, 5.4, 5.5


                                 PROB 1:

ADD n^{1/n} TO MAKE IT A LIST OF TEN FUNCTIONS.  Reword as follows:

List the following ten functions from left to right so that each function is "little-o" of
the function to its right.

                                 PROB 3:

reword first sentence:

The general form of an inhomogeneous linear recurrence of degree 1 is:


in part (b) change "x" to "f"

                                  PROB 6

The ideas all appear in the case d=2, and fixing d=2 makes evrything
easier to read.  Relabel part (d) be part (b)--it has nothing to do with
current parts (b)(c).
Relabel current (b) into (c).  Insert a new part (d):
    Give explcit formulas for a_1 a_2 in terms of beta1 beta2.
Finally,  relabel current part (c) as (e), omitting its first sentence.


Regards, A.


0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from kiwi.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA07855; Thu, 21 Mar 96 00:03:37 EST
From: achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Andrew Chou)
Received: by kiwi.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA22878; Thu, 21 Mar 96 00:03:37 EST
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 96 00:03:37 EST
Message-Id: <199603210503.AA22878@kiwi.lcs.mit.edu>
To: 6042-teachers

I made the changes to Pset 6.  Hopefully, it's ready to go out.

-- Andrew


0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <rivest@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from swan.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA15820; Thu, 21 Mar 96 10:04:47 EST
From: rivest@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Ron Rivest)
Received: by swan.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA01389; Thu, 21 Mar 96 10:04:37 EST
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 96 10:04:37 EST
Message-Id: <199603211504.AA01389@swan.lcs.mit.edu>
To: 6042-teachers
Subject: [achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu: ]


Pset 6 looks fine to me...

	Ron
==============================================================================
Return-Path: <achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
From: achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Andrew Chou)
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 96 00:03:37 EST
To: 6042-teachers

I made the changes to Pset 6.  Hopefully, it's ready to go out.

-- Andrew



0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <rivest@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from swan.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA16238; Thu, 21 Mar 96 10:21:14 EST
From: rivest@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Ron Rivest)
Received: by swan.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA01420; Thu, 21 Mar 96 10:21:13 EST
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 96 10:21:13 EST
Message-Id: <199603211521.AA01420@swan.lcs.mit.edu>
To: 6042-teachers
Subject: Handouts


What handouts are going out today?

	Cheers,
	Ron



0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from sparrow.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA16664; Thu, 21 Mar 96 10:56:16 EST
From: meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Albert R. Meyer)
Received: by sparrow.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA10074; Thu, 21 Mar 96 10:56:20 EST
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 96 10:56:20 EST
Message-Id: <199603211556.AA10074@sparrow.lcs.mit.edu>
To: achou
Cc: 6042-teachers
Subject: H24-PSet6-meyer.tex

I made all the changes we discussed, INCLUDING PROB6, except for
coefficients of fib(2n).  I leave it to you to fill in coefficients and do
final proofreading.

Regards, A.


0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from sparrow.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA16688; Thu, 21 Mar 96 10:56:53 EST
Received: from sparrow.lcs.mit.edu by sparrow.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA10082; Thu, 21 Mar 96 10:56:54 EST
Message-Id: <199603211556.AA10082@sparrow.lcs.mit.edu>
X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.2 7/18/95
To: 6042-teachers
Subject: make-up for tutorial
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 96 10:56:49 -0500
From: kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu


I got the following request from a student. Is there anything he could do to 
make up for the tutorials he missed? Perhaps an extra probelm?

I am inclined to give him a break, but I want to hear other opinions.

--Jakov


------- Forwarded Message

Date: Thu, 21 Mar 96 08:20:42 EST
To: kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu
From: Bryan Kincy <bdkincy@MIT.EDU>
Subject: 

Hi, I was wondering if there was anyway to make up tutorials from this past
week and the week before that.  Last week I had to be in lab all day Wed.
and this week has been rough with mid-terms, etc.  Thanks.


------- End of Forwarded Message




0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from sparrow.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA16748; Thu, 21 Mar 96 10:59:35 EST
Received: from sparrow.lcs.mit.edu by sparrow.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA10103; Thu, 21 Mar 96 10:59:35 EST
Message-Id: <199603211559.AA10103@sparrow.lcs.mit.edu>
X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.2 7/18/95
To: rivest@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Ron Rivest)
Cc: 6042-teachers
Subject: Re: Handouts 
In-Reply-To: Your message of Thu, 21 Mar 96 10:21:13 -0500.
             <199603211521.AA01420@swan.lcs.mit.edu> 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 96 10:59:35 -0500
From: kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu

> 
> What handouts are going out today?
> 
> 	Cheers,
> 	Ron
> 

Only problem set 6, which is handot 25.

--Jakov



0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from sparrow.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA16877; Thu, 21 Mar 96 11:06:57 EST
From: meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Albert R. Meyer)
Received: by sparrow.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA10135; Thu, 21 Mar 96 11:07:01 EST
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 96 11:07:01 EST
Message-Id: <199603211607.AA10135@sparrow.lcs.mit.edu>
To: kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu
Cc: 6042-teachers
In-Reply-To: kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu's message of Thu, 21 Mar 96 10:56:49 -0500 <199603211556.AA10082@sparrow.lcs.mit.edu>
Subject: make-up for tutorial

  "Last week I had to be in lab all day Wed."

Not likely a sytudent HAD to be in lab during another class.  
Sounds more like mismanagement of timne than legitiammte conflict.

   and this week has been rough with mid-terms, etc.

Rough for everyone, but no surprise.  Part of the MIT ed process is
learning to accomodate for "rough" weeks in advance.

Unless you know of special extenuating situation this student is in, I
don't see grounds for relaxing our tutorial policy.

Regards, A.


0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from sparrow.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA17144; Thu, 21 Mar 96 11:16:23 EST
From: meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Albert R. Meyer)
Received: by sparrow.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA10152; Thu, 21 Mar 96 11:16:27 EST
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 96 11:16:27 EST
Message-Id: <199603211616.AA10152@sparrow.lcs.mit.edu>
To: achou
Cc: 6042-teachers
Subject: H25-Pset6-meyer.tex

is now complete, even with coefficients.
Regards, A.


0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from sparrow.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA19080; Thu, 21 Mar 96 13:02:30 EST
Received: from sparrow.lcs.mit.edu by sparrow.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA10307; Thu, 21 Mar 96 13:02:26 EST
Message-Id: <199603211802.AA10307@sparrow.lcs.mit.edu>
X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.2 7/18/95
To: 6042-teachers
Subject: ps5 solutions
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 96 13:02:25 -0500
From: kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu


are ready

--Jakov



0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from kiwi.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA22748; Thu, 21 Mar 96 16:18:23 EST
From: achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Andrew Chou)
Received: by kiwi.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA23138; Thu, 21 Mar 96 16:18:21 EST
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 96 16:18:21 EST
Message-Id: <199603212118.AA23138@kiwi.lcs.mit.edu>
To: 6042-teachers
Subject: [peterb@MIT.EDU: 6.042J/18.062 Final Exam]

Our final has been scheduled.  I will send out a forum announcement.

-- Andrew

Return-Path: <peterb@MIT.EDU>
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 96 12:07:23 EST
X-Sender: peterb@po9.mit.edu
X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Pro Version 2.1.2
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
To: achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu
From: "Peter D. Bedrosian" <peterb@MIT.EDU>
Subject: 6.042J/18.062 Final Exam

Andrew,

The final exam in 6.042J/18.062 will be given on Friday, May 24, 1996 from
9am to 12noon in dupont.

If you have any questions, please call at 253-4788.

Peter D. Bedrosian
Schedules Office
E19-334 




0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from kiwi.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA22842; Thu, 21 Mar 96 16:21:48 EST
From: achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Andrew Chou)
Received: by kiwi.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA23150; Thu, 21 Mar 96 16:21:47 EST
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 96 16:21:47 EST
Message-Id: <199603212121.AA23150@kiwi.lcs.mit.edu>
To: 6042-forum

To 6.042 students,

Our final exam has been scheduled.  It is

	FRIDAY,  MAY 24
	9am - 12am
	DuPont Gym

If you have a conflict, please contact a staff member.

Andrew Chou
6.042 TA


0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from sparrow.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA07841; Fri, 22 Mar 96 11:17:04 EST
Received: from sparrow.lcs.mit.edu by sparrow.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA11234; Fri, 22 Mar 96 11:17:09 EST
Message-Id: <199603221617.AA11234@sparrow.lcs.mit.edu>
X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.2 7/18/95
To: Bryan Kincy <bdkincy@MIT.EDU>
Cc: 6042-teachers
Subject: Re: make-up tutorial
In-Reply-To: Your message of Thu, 21 Mar 96 08:20:42 -0500.
             <9603211320.AA00538@MIT.MIT.EDU> 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 96 11:17:08 -0500
From: kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu


> Hi, I was wondering if there was anyway to make up tutorials from this past
> week and the week before that.  Last week I had to be in lab all day Wed.
> and this week has been rough with mid-terms, etc.  Thanks.
> 

I understand that you have a rough schedule and have not been able to make the 
tutorial. Unfortunately, we don't have a way of making-up for the tutorials.

I have discussed your case with the professors in the course, and unless there 
are other circumstances (e.g. you were sick, or your work at the lab could not 
be done at other time because lab was not available, etc.) we cannot excuse 
your missed tutorials.

Regards,
--Jakov



0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <miccianc@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from kingfisher.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA09975; Fri, 22 Mar 96 13:33:45 EST
From: miccianc@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Daniele Micciancio)
Received: by kingfisher.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA18905; Fri, 22 Mar 96 13:39:24 EST
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 96 13:39:24 EST
Message-Id: <199603221839.AA18905@kingfisher.lcs.mit.edu>
To: 6042-teachers
Subject: [jingq@MIT.EDU: Re: 6.042]

Return-Path: <jingq@MIT.EDU>
To: miccianc@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Daniele Micciancio)
Subject: Re: 6.042
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 96 22:37:27
From: jingq@MIT.EDU (Jing Qian )

Hi, Daniele

I'll probably drop the class this week.
	
	Jing




0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from sparrow.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA10022; Fri, 22 Mar 96 13:35:55 EST
From: meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Albert R. Meyer)
Received: by sparrow.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA11350; Fri, 22 Mar 96 13:36:00 EST
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 96 13:36:00 EST
Message-Id: <199603221836.AA11350@sparrow.lcs.mit.edu>
To: 6042-teachers
Subject: [anneh@eecs.MIT.EDU: Please Avoid My Freshman Meeting!]

Date: Fri, 22 Mar 96 11:16:49 -0500
From: anneh@eecs.MIT.EDU (Anne Hunter)
To: braida@FOZZIE.MIT.EDU, lang@mit.edu, drake@mit.edu, meyer@lcs.mit.edu
Subject: Please Avoid My Freshman Meeting!
Reply-To: anneh@eecs.MIT.EDU


I'm scheduling a meeting with all of the freshmen who've declared
Course VI for Friday, April 17th, from 10 AM to 12 N.  This is the
day after classes end.

Please ask your TAs or whoever will be scheduling final exam review
sessions to avoid that time, as I need all the Course VI freshmen to
be able to attend that meeting.  I hope to assign advisors to just
about all of them during that meeting.  A review session scheduled
then would really screw things up.

Also, please remember that the end of the term is almost upon us,
and decide when and how you want students to find out their final
grades and see their finals.  Freshmen are usually the most clueless
on this matter, so be sure to pass out something in writing at least
twice, and avoid the term "course secretary", which they're all sure
means me!

Thanks for your help!

Anne Hunter



0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from sparrow.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA10049; Fri, 22 Mar 96 13:37:08 EST
From: meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Albert R. Meyer)
Received: by sparrow.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA11353; Fri, 22 Mar 96 13:37:13 EST
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 96 13:37:13 EST
Message-Id: <199603221837.AA11353@sparrow.lcs.mit.edu>
To: 6042-teachers
Subject: [anneh@eecs.MIT.EDU: Oops!  I meant MAY 17th!]

Date: Fri, 22 Mar 96 11:37:37 -0500
From: anneh@eecs.MIT.EDU (Anne Hunter)
To: braida@FOZZIE.MIT.EDU, lang@mit.edu, drake@mit.edu, meyer@lcs.mit.edu
Subject: Oops!  I meant MAY 17th!
Reply-To: anneh@eecs.MIT.EDU



Anne



0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from stork.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA27115; Thu, 28 Mar 96 16:43:11 EST
From: meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Albert R. Meyer)
Received: by stork.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA00367; Thu, 28 Mar 96 16:44:25 EST
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 96 16:44:25 EST
Message-Id: <199603282144.AA00367@stork.lcs.mit.edu>
To: 6042-teachers
Subject: Tuesday staff meeting

For Tuesday's staff meeting, we need TUTORIAL PROBLEMS on recurrences
(fall95/tut6 has some plausible ones we might rework).  I think the
problems should be variants of what we're asking them on Pset6, so I'd
like Andrew and Jakov and whoever is doing pset6 solutions to draft some
proposed tutorial problems and bring them to staff meeting.

Who is doing PSet6 solutions?

I'd like everyone to bring at least one proposed Quiz2 problem for us to
consider for Tuesday's meeting.

Who will be responsible for Pset7, covering Rosen 4.1, 4.3, 4.6, 5.4, 5.5;
and multisets?  On Tuesday, I'd like us at least to have problems lined up
for the Rosen material.

I'll be out of town till Monday night.  I'll try to be reachable by email.

Regards, A.


0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <miccianc@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from nightingale.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA26787; Sun, 31 Mar 96 01:27:40 EST
From: miccianc@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Daniele Micciancio)
Received: by nightingale.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA02376; Sun, 31 Mar 96 01:26:03 EST
Date: Sun, 31 Mar 96 01:26:03 EST
Message-Id: <199603310626.AA02376@nightingale.lcs.mit.edu>
To: 6042-teachers
Subject: PS6 solutions



Solutions to PS6 are in Hxx-Soln6.{tex,dvi,ps}

--Daniele


0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from swan.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA02866; Tue, 02 Apr 96 16:28:43 EST
From: achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Andrew Chou)
Received: by swan.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA01565; Tue, 02 Apr 96 16:28:43 EST
Date: Tue, 02 Apr 96 16:28:43 EST
Message-Id: <199604022128.AA01565@swan.lcs.mit.edu>
To: 6042-teachers
Subject: Tut 8

Tutorial 8 is available in the course directory.

-- Andrew


0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <miccianc@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from kingfisher.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA28639; Wed, 03 Apr 96 20:41:39 EST
From: miccianc@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Daniele Micciancio)
Received: by kingfisher.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA09444; Wed, 03 Apr 96 20:47:33 EST
Date: Wed, 03 Apr 96 20:47:33 EST
Message-Id: <199604040147.AA09444@kingfisher.lcs.mit.edu>
To: 6042-teachers
Subject: ps6 solns


Hxx-Soln6.{tex,dvi,ps} now contain
some explanation on the first problem.

--Daniele


0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <miccianc@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from kingfisher.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA10425; Thu, 04 Apr 96 11:38:58 EST
From: miccianc@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Daniele Micciancio)
Received: by kingfisher.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA10734; Thu, 04 Apr 96 11:44:53 EST
Date: Thu, 04 Apr 96 11:44:53 EST
Message-Id: <199604041644.AA10734@kingfisher.lcs.mit.edu>
To: 6042-teachers
Subject: quiz2


I drafted a couple of counting problems for quiz2.
(Quiz2/q2-dan.tex)

--Daniele


0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from sparrow.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA10793; Thu, 04 Apr 96 11:57:27 EST
Received: from sparrow.lcs.mit.edu by sparrow.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA01205; Thu, 04 Apr 96 11:57:32 EST
Message-Id: <199604041657.AA01205@sparrow.lcs.mit.edu>
X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.2 7/18/95
To: 6042-tas
Subject: tutorial 8
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Thu, 04 Apr 96 11:57:32 -0500
From: kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu


there was an error in problem 1,

	T(n) = T(\sqrt{n}) + \ln\ln n

shuold be

	... + \lg \lg n

(log base 2). I made the correction to the handout.

--Jakov



0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from sparrow.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA11870; Thu, 04 Apr 96 12:48:20 EST
Received: from sparrow.lcs.mit.edu by sparrow.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA01293; Thu, 04 Apr 96 12:48:24 EST
Message-Id: <199604041748.AA01293@sparrow.lcs.mit.edu>
X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.2 7/18/95
To: 6042-teachers
Subject: quiz2 
Date: Thu, 04 Apr 96 12:48:24 -0500
From: kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu


I made two problems for the quiz and they are in

Quiz2/q2-jakov

--Jakov



0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from thrush.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA00959; Thu, 04 Apr 96 16:24:19 EST
From: achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Andrew Chou)
Received: by thrush.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA01475; Thu, 04 Apr 96 16:29:37 EST
Date: Thu, 04 Apr 96 16:29:37 EST
Message-Id: <199604042129.AA01475@thrush.lcs.mit.edu>
To: 6042-forum
Subject: Quiz 2 Announcement

                           QUIZ 2 ANNOUNCEMENT

Quiz 2 is this TUESDAY, APRIL 9, 7PM--9PM in WALKER MEMORIAL.  If you have
an unavoidable conflict, contact a staff member immediately.

The quiz is OPEN BOOK and OPEN NOTES.  (No electronic gadgets allowed,
however.)

The material will cover Lectures 1--14.  Binomial coefficients and the
binomial theoreom will be covered.  The material on
inclusion/exclusion will NOT be on the quiz.

The TA office hours for the quiz week have been modified.

They are:
Mon 	2-4	Parry 	NE43-334
Mon 	3-5	Andrew	NE43-311
Mon 	4-6	Jakov 	NE43-334
Mon 	5-7	Daniele NE43-368

As always, you may attend any TA's office hours.


0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <miccianc@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from kingfisher.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA03715; Thu, 04 Apr 96 18:57:54 EST
From: miccianc@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Daniele Micciancio)
Received: by kingfisher.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA11538; Thu, 04 Apr 96 19:03:51 EST
Date: Thu, 04 Apr 96 19:03:51 EST
Message-Id: <199604050003.AA11538@kingfisher.lcs.mit.edu>
To: 6042-teachers
Subject: PS6 Solns


Last version of PS6 solutions is ready 
in H28-Soln6.{tex,dvi,ps}.

Daniele


0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <spyang@MIT.EDU>
Received: from MIT.EDU (PACIFIC-CARRIER-ANNEX.MIT.EDU) by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA05151; Thu, 04 Apr 96 21:11:27 EST
Received: from W20-575-35.MIT.EDU by MIT.EDU with SMTP
	id AA06937; Thu, 4 Apr 96 21:10:30 EST
From: spyang@MIT.EDU
Received: by w20-575-35.MIT.EDU (5.57/4.7) id AA03227; Thu, 4 Apr 96 21:11:27 -0500
Message-Id: <9604050211.AA03227@w20-575-35.MIT.EDU>
To: 6042-teachers@theory.lcs.mit.edu
Subject: exam conflict
Date: Thu, 04 Apr 1996 21:11:26 EST

Hi, I'm a 6.042 student, and I'd like to take the conflict exam on Tuesday.
Would that be from 4:45-6:45, and where?

Thanks,
Steven P. Yang


0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <ching@MIT.EDU>
Received: from MIT.EDU (SOUTH-STATION-ANNEX.MIT.EDU) by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA18946; Fri, 05 Apr 96 15:04:43 EST
Received: from M37-312-31.MIT.EDU by MIT.EDU with SMTP
	id AA21182; Fri, 5 Apr 96 15:03:46 EST
Received: by m37-312-31.MIT.EDU (5.0/4.7) id AA15187; Fri, 5 Apr 1996 15:04:41 -0500
Message-Id: <9604052004.AA15187@m37-312-31.MIT.EDU>
X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.5 12/11/95
To: 6042-tas@theory.lcs.mit.edu
Cc: ching@MIT.EDU
Subject: Course Archive
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Fri, 05 Apr 1996 15:04:41 EST
From: Roland Ching Law <ching@MIT.EDU>
Content-Length: 218

Dear TAs,

	I'm getting permission denied message while trying to ftp  H19-PS6soln.ps  
and H20-Pset8.ps in Sping95 archive. H16-XXX.ps is also missing.
	Thanks for paying attention to this.	

Regards,
Ching Law
   
	


0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from sparrow.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA19170; Fri, 05 Apr 96 15:14:35 EST
Received: from sparrow.lcs.mit.edu by sparrow.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA05371; Fri, 05 Apr 96 15:14:40 EST
Message-Id: <199604052014.AA05371@sparrow.lcs.mit.edu>
X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.2 7/18/95
To: 6042-forum
Subject: correction to problem set 5 solutions
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Fri, 05 Apr 96 15:14:38 -0500
From: kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu


As one of the graders has pointed out, there was an error in the solution to 
problem 2C on the PS 5. The correct solution is available on the web (see 
errata under Handout 25).

Our apologies,

--6.042 TAs







0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <ooze@MIT.EDU>
Received: from MIT.EDU (SOUTH-STATION-ANNEX.MIT.EDU) by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA21314; Fri, 05 Apr 96 17:07:00 EST
Received: from RINGWORLD.MIT.EDU by MIT.EDU with SMTP
	id AA06558; Fri, 5 Apr 96 17:06:04 EST
Received: (from ooze@localhost) by ringworld.MIT.EDU (8.6.11/8.6.11) id RAA29962; Fri, 5 Apr 1996 17:06:58 -0500
From: Owen W Ozier <ooze@MIT.EDU>
Message-Id: <199604052206.RAA29962@ringworld.MIT.EDU>
To: parry@theory.lcs.mit.edu
Cc: 6042-teachers@theory.lcs.mit.edu
Subject: Conflict:  6.042 Exam 2
Date: Fri, 05 Apr 1996 17:06:54 EST


I can't go from 7-9, but again, I can go from 5-7 or 4:45-6:45

Let me know where it will be.

Thanks,


-Owen W. Ozier
<ooze@mit.edu>


0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from thrush.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA02046; Sat, 06 Apr 96 10:13:30 EST
From: achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Andrew Chou)
Received: by thrush.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA02267; Sat, 06 Apr 96 10:18:50 EST
Date: Sat, 06 Apr 96 10:18:50 EST
Message-Id: <199604061518.AA02267@thrush.lcs.mit.edu>
To: ching@MIT.EDU
Cc: 6042-tas
In-Reply-To: Roland Ching Law's message of Fri, 05 Apr 1996 15:04:41 EST <9604052004.AA15187@m37-312-31.MIT.EDU>
Subject: Course Archive

I changed the permission on the two files.  H16-xxx.ps is a copy of
the CLR notes that we distributed in class.

-- Andrew

>Dear TAs,
>
>	I'm getting permission denied message while trying to ftp  H19-PS6soln.ps  
>and H20-Pset8.ps in Sping95 archive. H16-XXX.ps is also missing.
>	Thanks for paying attention to this.	
>
>Regards,
>Ching Law


1,,
Return-Path: <spyang@MIT.EDU>
Received: from MIT.EDU (SOUTH-STATION-ANNEX.MIT.EDU) by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA04308; Sat, 06 Apr 96 15:01:34 EST
Received: from W20-575-117.MIT.EDU by MIT.EDU with SMTP
	id AA28330; Sat, 6 Apr 96 15:00:37 EST
Received: by w20-575-117.MIT.EDU (5.0/4.7) id AA08195; Sat, 6 Apr 1996 15:01:32 -0500
Message-Id: <9604062001.AA08195@w20-575-117.MIT.EDU>
To: 6042-teachers@theory.lcs.mit.edu
Subject: exam conflict
Date: Sat, 06 Apr 1996 15:01:31 EST
From: Steven P Yang <spyang@MIT.EDU>
Content-Length: 246

*** EOOH ***
To: 6042-teachers@theory.lcs.mit.edu
Subject: exam conflict
Date: Sat, 06 Apr 1996 15:01:31 EST
From: Steven P Yang <spyang@MIT.EDU>

Hi, I didn't receive a response from my last email.  I would like to take
a conflict exam for exam II,  and need to know when and where it will take
place.  Approximately 5PM-7PM on the day of the test seems best for me. 

Thanks,
Steven P. Yang


1,,
Return-Path: <achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from thrush.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA16716; Sun, 07 Apr 96 17:05:34 EDT
From: achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Andrew Chou)
Received: by thrush.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA04664; Sun, 07 Apr 96 17:10:55 EDT
Date: Sun, 07 Apr 96 17:10:55 EDT
Message-Id: <199604072110.AA04664@thrush.lcs.mit.edu>
To: nazareth@tep.org, spyang@MIT.EDU, ooze@MIT.EDU
Cc: 6042-teachers
Subject: Quiz 2 conflict exam

*** EOOH ***
From: achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Andrew Chou)
Date: Sun, 07 Apr 96 17:10:55 EDT
To: nazareth@tep.org, spyang@MIT.EDU, ooze@MIT.EDU
Cc: 6042-teachers
Subject: Quiz 2 conflict exam

The quiz 2 conflict exam will be from 4:45-6:45 this Tuesday.
Meet at 4:45 in the NE43, 3rd floor lounge.

-- Andrew


1,,
Return-Path: <achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from thrush.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA16880; Sun, 07 Apr 96 17:15:58 EDT
From: achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Andrew Chou)
Received: by thrush.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA04698; Sun, 07 Apr 96 17:21:19 EDT
Date: Sun, 07 Apr 96 17:21:19 EDT
Message-Id: <199604072121.AA04698@thrush.lcs.mit.edu>
To: 6042-forum
Subject: Last call for final conflicts

*** EOOH ***
From: achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Andrew Chou)
Date: Sun, 07 Apr 96 17:21:19 EDT
To: 6042-forum
Subject: Last call for final conflicts

To 6.042 students,

Just as a reminder, our final is

	FRIDAY,  MAY 24
	9am - 12am
	DuPont Gym

If you have a conflict, you must notify us.

For those you who have informed us, I will send you a message
requesting alternative times.  If you do not receive this message,
then we don't know you have a conflict, and you must inform us.

All requests must be received by this Wednesday (Apr 10).  For those
making late requests, we reserve the right to make their conflict exam
extremely difficult.


1,,
Return-Path: <achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from thrush.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA17016; Sun, 07 Apr 96 17:27:18 EDT
From: achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Andrew Chou)
Received: by thrush.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA04712; Sun, 07 Apr 96 17:32:37 EDT
Date: Sun, 07 Apr 96 17:32:37 EDT
Message-Id: <199604072132.AA04712@thrush.lcs.mit.edu>
To: 6042-forum
Subject: Collaboration statement

*** EOOH ***
From: achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Andrew Chou)
Date: Sun, 07 Apr 96 17:32:37 EDT
To: 6042-forum
Subject: Collaboration statement

This is a clarification of the collaboration policy on homeworks.

For the remaining problem sets, you must include a collaboration
statement.  It will either 

	1) List the people with whom you have collaborated

	2) State that there was no collaboration.

You are encouraged to collaborate.  However, it is your responsibility
to acknowledge those individuals with whom you worked.

If you have any questions about this policy, please see a staff member.


0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from sparrow.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA17242; Sun, 07 Apr 96 17:55:12 EDT
From: meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Albert R. Meyer)
Received: by sparrow.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA00500; Sun, 07 Apr 96 17:55:17 EDT
Date: Sun, 07 Apr 96 17:55:17 EDT
Message-Id: <199604072155.AA00500@sparrow.lcs.mit.edu>
To: jee_hbm@MIT.EDU
In-Reply-To: jee_hbm@MIT.EDU's message of Fri, 5 Apr 1996 01:11:36 -0500 <199604050611.BAA29205@ringworld.MIT.EDU>
Subject: 6.042 Exam conflict
Cc: 6042-teachers

   Date: Fri, 5 Apr 1996 01:11:36 -0500
   X-Url: 
   X-Mailer: Lynx, Version 2.3 BETA
   X-Personal_Name: Jean-Emile Elien
   From: jee_hbm@MIT.EDU

   I'm not sure if I already sent this, but this is to remind you that Jeff Morrow
   and myself will need to take the exam early on Tuesday.  he agreed time
   was 4:30pm.

From: achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Andrew Chou)
Date: Sun, 07 Apr 96 17:10:55 EDT
To: nazareth@tep.org, spyang@MIT.EDU, ooze@MIT.EDU

Subject: Quiz 2 conflict exam

The quiz 2 conflict exam will be from 4:45-6:45 this Tuesday.
Meet at 4:45 in the NE43, 3rd floor lounge.

-- Andrew



0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <kgajos@MIT.EDU>
Received: from MIT.EDU (PACIFIC-CARRIER-ANNEX.MIT.EDU) by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA19462; Sun, 07 Apr 96 22:17:31 EDT
Received: from AL-BURRO.MIT.EDU by MIT.EDU with SMTP
	id AA08321; Sun, 7 Apr 96 22:16:32 EDT
From: kgajos@MIT.EDU
Received: by al-burro.MIT.EDU (5.57/4.7) id AA05869; Sun, 7 Apr 96 22:17:28 -0400
Message-Id: <9604080217.AA05869@al-burro.MIT.EDU>
To: 6042-teachers@theory.lcs.mit.edu
Subject: Quiz conflict
Date: Sun, 07 Apr 1996 22:17:24 EDT


	I have a class on Tuesday between 7 p.m. and 10.30 p.m. Can I take a conflict exam (same time as last time)?

					Krzysztof Gajos
					kgajos@mit.edu


0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <parry@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from woodpecker.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA20717; Mon, 08 Apr 96 01:13:32 EDT
Received: from woodpecker.lcs.mit.edu by woodpecker.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA10408; Mon, 08 Apr 96 01:16:12 EDT
Message-Id: <199604080516.AA10408@woodpecker.lcs.mit.edu>
To: 6042-teachers
Subject: Q2 problems
Date: Mon, 08 Apr 96 01:16:11 -0400
From: parry@theory.lcs.mit.edu

I added a couple of problems to the Quiz2 directory.

Parry


0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <jstipins@MIT.EDU>
Received: from MIT.EDU (SOUTH-STATION-ANNEX.MIT.EDU) by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA12118; Mon, 08 Apr 96 21:52:36 EDT
Received: from DZINTARS.MIT.EDU by MIT.EDU with SMTP
	id AA14869; Mon, 8 Apr 96 21:51:36 EDT
Received: from dzintars.mit.edu by dzintars.mit.edu (8.7.1/4.7) id BAA23281; Tue, 9 Apr 1996 01:52:35 GMT
Sender: jstipins@MIT.EDU
Message-Id: <3169C2E3.5A20B7C7@mit.edu>
Date: Mon, 08 Apr 1996 21:52:35 -0400
From: Janis Stipins III <jstipins@MIT.EDU>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.01 (X11; I; Linux 1.2.13 i586)
Mime-Version: 1.0
To: 6042-tas@theory.lcs.mit.edu
Subject: 6.042 exam conflict
X-Url: ftp://theory.lcs.mit.edu/pub/classes/6.042/homepage.html
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Hello...

If at all possible, I would like to take the exam tomorrow
at an earlier time than scheduled, because I have a class 
from 7-9 that I should not miss.  Preferably, I would take
the exam from 4-6 or so.  

Please let me know if this is possible. I apologize for 
the short notice.

-Janis Stipins III


0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <parry@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from woodpecker.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA25866; Tue, 09 Apr 96 12:26:59 EDT
Received: from woodpecker.lcs.mit.edu by woodpecker.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA12828; Tue, 09 Apr 96 12:29:39 EDT
Message-Id: <199604091629.AA12828@woodpecker.lcs.mit.edu>
X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.2 7/18/95
To: 6042-teachers
Subject: Advice on what to do?
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Tue, 09 Apr 96 12:29:38 -0400
From: parry@theory.lcs.mit.edu

I got this in my mailbox.

Parry

------- Forwarded Message


0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <davidz@mit.edu>
Received: from ASHLAND.MIT.EDU by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA14207; Tue, 09 Apr 96 00:20:17 EDT
Received: (from davidz@localhost) by ashland.MIT.EDU (8.6.12/8.6.12) id 
AAA00745; Tue, 9 Apr 1996 00:20:13 -0400
From: David C Zhang <davidz@mit.edu>
Message-Id: <199604090420.AAA00745@ashland.MIT.EDU>
To: kucan@theory.lcs.MIT.EDU, parry@theory.lcs.MIT.EDU
Subject: conflict with quiz 2
Date: Tue, 09 Apr 1996 00:20:12 EDT

Hi Jakov, Parry,

I have a conflict with quiz 2 that I must ask not to take the quiz
tomorrow.

I work as a 1.00 grader this term, and I must finish grading the
problem sets by Tues or latest Weds since the students have an
exam on Thurs. For this major reason, plus more load from my other
classes, I have found time to study for this quiz.

My origional plan was to get help from other graders, but today we
had a meeting and none of the graders could help out. My only resort
is to reschedule the quiz. I am sorry that this is such a late request,
but I didn't have the foresight that no one could help me out.

Thanks

David


------- End of Forwarded Message




0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <parry@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from woodpecker.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA25900; Tue, 09 Apr 96 12:29:51 EDT
Received: from woodpecker.lcs.mit.edu by woodpecker.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA12861; Tue, 09 Apr 96 12:32:31 EDT
Message-Id: <199604091632.AA12861@woodpecker.lcs.mit.edu>
X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.2 7/18/95
To: Janis Stipins III <jstipins@MIT.EDU>
Cc: 6042-teachers
Subject: Re: 6.042 exam conflict 
In-Reply-To: Your message of Mon, 08 Apr 96 21:52:35 -0400.
             <3169C2E3.5A20B7C7@mit.edu> 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Tue, 09 Apr 96 12:32:31 -0400
From: parry@theory.lcs.mit.edu

> Hello...
> 
> If at all possible, I would like to take the exam tomorrow
> at an earlier time than scheduled, because I have a class 
> from 7-9 that I should not miss.  Preferably, I would take
> the exam from 4-6 or so.  
> 
> Please let me know if this is possible. I apologize for 
> the short notice.
> 
> -Janis Stipins III
> 

4:30 - 6:30 in the 3rd floor conference room.  Same as last time.

Parry




0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <miccianc@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from kingfisher.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA26635; Tue, 09 Apr 96 13:03:20 EDT
From: miccianc@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Daniele Micciancio)
Received: by kingfisher.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA23330; Tue, 09 Apr 96 13:09:21 EDT
Date: Tue, 09 Apr 96 13:09:21 EDT
Message-Id: <199604091709.AA23330@kingfisher.lcs.mit.edu>
To: 6042-teachers
Subject: tutorial problem


The problem on counting for tomorrow's
tutorial is in unused.tex

Daniele


0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from stork.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA26899; Tue, 09 Apr 96 13:13:11 EDT
From: meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Albert R. Meyer)
Received: by stork.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA07497; Tue, 09 Apr 96 13:14:36 EDT
Date: Tue, 09 Apr 96 13:14:36 EDT
Message-Id: <199604091714.AA07497@stork.lcs.mit.edu>
To: miccianc@theory.lcs.mit.edu
Cc: 6042-teachers
In-Reply-To: Daniele Micciancio's message of Tue, 09 Apr 96 13:09:21 EDT <199604091709.AA23330@kingfisher.lcs.mit.edu>
Subject: tutorial problem

I've put your and the other problem together in Tutorials/tut9.tex.
I leave it to you to do final proofread and printing.

Regards, A.


0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from stork.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA02003; Tue, 09 Apr 96 16:48:40 EDT
From: meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Albert R. Meyer)
Received: by stork.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA07704; Tue, 09 Apr 96 16:50:04 EDT
Date: Tue, 09 Apr 96 16:50:04 EDT
Message-Id: <199604092050.AA07704@stork.lcs.mit.edu>
To: 6042-teachers
Subject: q2-soln.tex

FYI: I've included a few of the short answers in the quiz2 solution file.

Regards, A.


0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from sparrow.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA16442; Wed, 10 Apr 96 08:23:00 EDT
From: meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Albert R. Meyer)
Received: by sparrow.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA01466; Wed, 10 Apr 96 08:23:05 EDT
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 96 08:23:05 EDT
Message-Id: <199604101223.AA01466@sparrow.lcs.mit.edu>
To: 6042-teachers
Subject: [hndrson@MIT.EDU: <DELETED>]

Regarding student of Parry's who requested quiz postponement.  Name
deleted for privacy.

Regards, A. 
--------------------------

Date: Tue, 09 Apr 96 17:49:52
From: hndrson@MIT.EDU (Arnold Henderson)
To: MEYER@LCS.MIT.EDU
Subject: <DELETED>
Cc: hndrson@MIT.EDU

<DELETED> File

Dear Professor Meyer,

Please review these hastily written notes at your convenience. Since 
you, <DELETED> and I have discussed this matter, I thought it might be 
helpful to have something to refresh my memory in late May.

As we discussed this afternoon, <DELETED>, a grader in <DELETED>, came to 
me explaining that he had been referred by you to this office.  <DELETED> was 
requesting a chance for make-up exam scheduled which was scheduled for 
this evening.  His reason for wanting a make-up was that he had become 
unexpectedly overextended with <DELETED> problem sets to grade, primarily 
because the students had been having difficulties completing the work 
and several passed them in late. When I asked if he could get any help 
with the grading, he explained that he had mentioned this to the <DELETED>
TAs but they were unable to give him any assistance before the deadline.

After I discussed this matter with you, we agreed that it would be best 
for the student to take the exam.  You expressed sympathy for the 
student and his need to complete his work responsibilities but felt that 
a make-up would open a "Pandora's Box". I agreed and confessed that the 
only argument that I could make in the student's behalf would be a 
"mercy plea".

You stated that "mercy would be given when it was needed" - possibly at 
the end of the term when calculating <DELETED> grades.  <DELETED> has 
told me that he will take the exam.

Thank you for your concern about this student's welfare.

Best,

Arnold Henderson, Jr.
Counseling and Support Services



0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from sparrow.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA16519; Wed, 10 Apr 96 08:33:21 EDT
From: meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Albert R. Meyer)
Received: by sparrow.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA01479; Wed, 10 Apr 96 08:33:25 EDT
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 96 08:33:25 EDT
Message-Id: <199604101233.AA01479@sparrow.lcs.mit.edu>
To: hartmans@mit.edu
In-Reply-To: Sam Hartman's message of Tue, 9 Apr 1996 21:36:58 -0400 <199604100136.VAA24998@tertius.mit.edu>
Subject: have a test
Cc: 6042-teachers

got it.

Thanks, A.


0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from sparrow.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA16609; Wed, 10 Apr 96 08:39:18 EDT
From: meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Albert R. Meyer)
Received: by sparrow.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA01482; Wed, 10 Apr 96 08:39:22 EDT
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 96 08:39:22 EDT
Message-Id: <199604101239.AA01482@sparrow.lcs.mit.edu>
To: hndrson@MIT.EDU
In-Reply-To: Arnold Henderson's message of Tue, 09 Apr 96 17:49:52 <9604092146.AA01180@MIT.MIT.EDU>
Subject: student requesting quiz postponement
Cc: 6042-teachers

Thanks for your accurate summary notes on our conversation.  I've
forwarded it to the course staff, with names deleted for email security.

Here among the Computer Scientists, we consider unencrypted email to be
like a postcard--so we don't mention student names or other identification
in messages about private situations.  (It will be nice when encryption
technology is conveniently and uniformly available, but it ain't yet :-) )

Yours truly,
Prof. Albert R. Meyer
MIT Lab. for Computer Science


0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from dove.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA26177; Wed, 10 Apr 96 17:01:23 EDT
Received: from dove.lcs.mit.edu by dove.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA23294; Wed, 10 Apr 96 17:03:52 EDT
Message-Id: <199604102103.AA23294@dove.lcs.mit.edu>
X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.2 7/18/95
To: 6042-teachers
Subject: grading the quiz
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 96 17:03:51 -0400
From: kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu


Dow many points should we give for each problem? Here is a proposal:

problem		pts
1		20
2		15
3		15
4		15
5		15
6		20

Does this sound right?

--Jakov



0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <parry@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from woodpecker.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA28580; Wed, 10 Apr 96 19:04:42 EDT
Received: from woodpecker.lcs.mit.edu by woodpecker.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA16346; Wed, 10 Apr 96 19:07:22 EDT
Message-Id: <199604102307.AA16346@woodpecker.lcs.mit.edu>
X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.2 7/18/95
To: 6042-teachers
Subject: PS#7
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 96 19:07:22 -0400
From: parry@theory.lcs.mit.edu

I put a few (7) problems in Hxx-Pset7.tex in the course directory.  I think 
I'm still missing a problem on the Stirling numbers.

Parry



0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <rivest@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from swan.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA29436; Wed, 10 Apr 96 20:04:15 EDT
From: rivest@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Ron Rivest)
Received: by swan.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA07382; Wed, 10 Apr 96 20:04:13 EDT
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 96 20:04:13 EDT
Message-Id: <199604110004.AA07382@swan.lcs.mit.edu>
To: 6042-teachers
Subject: Homework problems


Instead of the given homework problem about relatively prime to 70,
how about:

==============================================================================
Suppose the number $n$ has the prime factorization
$p_1^{e_1} p_2^{e_2} \cdots p_k^{e_k}$.
Let $\phi(n)$ denote the number of integers $a$ 
such that $1\le a < n$ and $\gcd(a,n)=1$.

Use the inclusion-exclusion theorem to prove that:
\[
\phi(n) = (1 - \frac{1}{p_1})(1 - \frac{1}{p_2})\cdots (1 - \frac{1}{p_k})\ .
\]
==============================================================================


0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <rivest@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from swan.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA29728; Wed, 10 Apr 96 20:16:41 EDT
From: rivest@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Ron Rivest)
Received: by swan.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA07388; Wed, 10 Apr 96 20:16:40 EDT
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 96 20:16:40 EDT
Message-Id: <199604110016.AA07388@swan.lcs.mit.edu>
To: 6042-teachers
Subject: Homework problem


Here's another possibility:

==============================================================================
Let $E(n)$ denote the number of equivalence relations on $n$ elements.
(This would be called $NB(n,n)$ in the notation used in class.)

Show that $E(n) = O(n!)$. (Hint: consider the smallest number in each
bag as a ``name'' for that class, and define an appropriate representation
for an arbitrary equivalence relation such that it is clear that there
can be no more than $n!$ equivalence relations.)

Show that $E(n) = \Omega(2^{n-1})$.
==============================================================================



0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from dove.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA00394; Wed, 10 Apr 96 20:51:57 EDT
Received: from dove.lcs.mit.edu by dove.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA23635; Wed, 10 Apr 96 20:54:27 EDT
Message-Id: <199604110054.AA23635@dove.lcs.mit.edu>
X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.2 7/18/95
To: rivest@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Ron Rivest)
Cc: 6042-teachers
Subject: Notes on multinomial coeff. 
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 96 20:54:26 -0400
From: kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu


I have a draft of the notes ready (notes-L16.{tex,dvi}).

The problem you suggest for PS7 is given as a theorem in the notes, but we can 
turn it into an exercise.

--Jakov


> 
> Here's another possibility:
> 
> ==============================================================================
> Let $E(n)$ denote the number of equivalence relations on $n$ elements.
> (This would be called $NB(n,n)$ in the notation used in class.)
> 
> Show that $E(n) = O(n!)$. (Hint: consider the smallest number in each
> bag as a ``name'' for that class, and define an appropriate representation
> for an arbitrary equivalence relation such that it is clear that there
> can be no more than $n!$ equivalence relations.)
> 
> Show that $E(n) = \Omega(2^{n-1})$.
> ==============================================================================
> 



0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <parry@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from woodpecker.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA00551; Wed, 10 Apr 96 21:03:27 EDT
Received: from woodpecker.lcs.mit.edu by woodpecker.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA17639; Wed, 10 Apr 96 21:06:08 EDT
Message-Id: <199604110106.AA17639@woodpecker.lcs.mit.edu>
X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.2 7/18/95
To: 6042-teachers
Subject: Re: Homework problems 
In-Reply-To: Your message of Wed, 10 Apr 96 20:04:13 -0400.
             <199604110004.AA07382@swan.lcs.mit.edu> 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 96 21:06:08 -0400
From: parry@theory.lcs.mit.edu

The proof for \phi(n) is essentially in the book.  Do we still want to put it 
in?  I'll also put in the equivalence class problem.

Parry



0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <derekt@mit.edu>
Received: from LE-MIEN.MIT.EDU by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA00877; Wed, 10 Apr 96 21:19:24 EDT
Received: (from derekt@localhost) by le-mien.MIT.EDU (8.6.12/8.6.11) id VAA08990; Wed, 10 Apr 1996 21:19:24 -0400
From: Derek W Truesdale <derekt@mit.edu>
Message-Id: <199604110119.VAA08990@le-mien.MIT.EDU>
To: 6042-teachers@theory.lcs.mit.edu
Subject: grading.
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 1996 21:19:24 EDT

just thought I'd point out a potential bug in the final grading:

tests are supposedly worth 30% of our grade, with one test worth 15%
and two worth 10%.

Derek.


0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from dove.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA02688; Fri, 12 Apr 96 10:59:54 EDT
Received: from dove.lcs.mit.edu by dove.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA26724; Fri, 12 Apr 96 11:02:24 EDT
Message-Id: <199604121502.AA26724@dove.lcs.mit.edu>
X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.2 7/18/95
To: 6042-teachers
Subject: notes on lecture 16 are ready
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 96 11:02:23 -0400
From: kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu


...as handout 32 in the FTP directory (also on the web).

--Jakov




0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from dove.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA09516; Fri, 12 Apr 96 16:43:28 EDT
Received: from dove.lcs.mit.edu by dove.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA27781; Fri, 12 Apr 96 16:45:59 EDT
Message-Id: <199604122045.AA27781@dove.lcs.mit.edu>
X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.2 7/18/95
To: 6042-teachers
Subject: grading the quiz
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 96 16:45:58 -0400
From: kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu


Just to confirm that we have decided to grade the quiz as follows:

problem		pts
1		20
2		15
3		15
4		15
5		15
6		20

--Jakov




0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from stork.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA22098; Sat, 13 Apr 96 12:58:41 EDT
From: meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Albert R. Meyer)
Received: by stork.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA09519; Sat, 13 Apr 96 13:00:09 EDT
Date: Sat, 13 Apr 96 13:00:09 EDT
Message-Id: <199604131700.AA09519@stork.lcs.mit.edu>
To: 6042-teachers
Subject: [hndrson@MIT.EDU: LC]

Date: Sat, 13 Apr 96 11:07:44
From: hndrson@MIT.EDU (Arnold Henderson)
To: SODINI@MTL.MIT.EDU, MEYER@LCS.MIT.EDU
Subject: LC




Dear Professors Sodini and Meyer,


Yesterday,I met with L.C., a student in your class, who presented me 
with medical documentation from MIT Medical.  The statement from his/her 
doctor requested further time for this person to recuperate before 
having to submit work to you.

If you have any questions or concerns, please do not hjesitate to 
contact me.

Best,

Arnold Henderson, Jr.
Associate Dean
Counseling and Support Services



0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from stork.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA21320; Mon, 15 Apr 96 15:04:08 EDT
From: meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Albert R. Meyer)
Received: by stork.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA11164; Mon, 15 Apr 96 15:05:37 EDT
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 96 15:05:37 EDT
Message-Id: <199604151905.AA11164@stork.lcs.mit.edu>
To: 6042-teachers
Subject: Quiz 2

Where are they?  (I'd like to pick them up this evening.)

Regards, A. 


0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from dove.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA25463; Mon, 15 Apr 96 19:27:10 EDT
Received: from dove.lcs.mit.edu by dove.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA00378; Mon, 15 Apr 96 19:29:43 EDT
Message-Id: <199604152329.AA00378@dove.lcs.mit.edu>
X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.2 7/18/95
To: 6042-teachers
Subject: ps 7 solutions
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 96 19:29:42 -0400
From: kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu


A first draft of the ps 7 solutions is available (krypt-ed) in the class 
directory.

--Jakov



0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from dove.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA25663; Mon, 15 Apr 96 19:45:42 EDT
Received: from dove.lcs.mit.edu by dove.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA00529; Mon, 15 Apr 96 19:48:15 EDT
Message-Id: <199604152348.AA00529@dove.lcs.mit.edu>
X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.2 7/18/95
To: 6042-teachers
Subject: ps 8 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 96 19:48:13 -0400
From: kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu


a draft of ps 8 is available (krypt-ed) in the course directory.

--Jakov



0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from kiwi.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA09754; Tue, 16 Apr 96 13:32:37 EDT
From: achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Andrew Chou)
Received: by kiwi.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA18199; Tue, 16 Apr 96 13:32:40 EDT
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 96 13:32:40 EDT
Message-Id: <199604161732.AA18199@kiwi.lcs.mit.edu>
To: 6042-teachers

Tutorial 10 is ready and in handout directory.

-- Andrew


0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from stork.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA10408; Tue, 16 Apr 96 14:00:18 EDT
From: meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Albert R. Meyer)
Received: by stork.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA12951; Tue, 16 Apr 96 14:01:49 EDT
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 96 14:01:49 EDT
Message-Id: <199604161801.AA12951@stork.lcs.mit.edu>
To: achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu
In-Reply-To: Andrew Chou's message of Tue, 16 Apr 96 13:32:40 EDT <199604161732.AA18199@kiwi.lcs.mit.edu>
Subject: tut10
Cc: 6042-teachers

   From: achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Andrew Chou)
   Date: Tue, 16 Apr 96 13:32:40 EDT

   Tutorial 10 is ready and in handout directory.

   -- Andrew

My slightly revised version now in Tuturials/H33-tut10.tex  (Andrew's
original moved there too.)

Regards, A.


0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <rivest@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from swan.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA10524; Tue, 16 Apr 96 14:04:42 EDT
From: rivest@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Ron Rivest)
Received: by swan.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA09844; Tue, 16 Apr 96 14:04:41 EDT
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 96 14:04:41 EDT
Message-Id: <199604161804.AA09844@swan.lcs.mit.edu>
To: 6042-teachers
Subject: [meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu: tut10]


I edited Albert's version slightly... Looks good..

	Cheers,
	Ron
==============================================================================
Return-Path: <meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
From: meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Albert R. Meyer)
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 96 14:01:49 EDT
To: achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu
In-Reply-To: Andrew Chou's message of Tue, 16 Apr 96 13:32:40 EDT <199604161732.AA18199@kiwi.lcs.mit.edu>
Subject: tut10
Cc: 6042-teachers

   From: achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Andrew Chou)
   Date: Tue, 16 Apr 96 13:32:40 EDT

   Tutorial 10 is ready and in handout directory.

   -- Andrew

My slightly revised version now in Tuturials/H33-tut10.tex  (Andrew's
original moved there too.)

Regards, A.



0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from dove.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA26750; Wed, 17 Apr 96 10:28:09 EDT
Received: from dove.lcs.mit.edu by dove.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA02582; Wed, 17 Apr 96 10:30:39 EDT
Message-Id: <199604171430.AA02582@dove.lcs.mit.edu>
X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.2 7/18/95
To: 6042-teachers
Subject: quiz 2 histogram...
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 96 10:30:38 -0400
From: kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu


...is available on the web.

--Jakov



0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from stork.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA04643; Wed, 17 Apr 96 16:35:42 EDT
From: meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Albert R. Meyer)
Received: by stork.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA14098; Wed, 17 Apr 96 16:37:14 EDT
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 96 16:37:14 EDT
Message-Id: <199604172037.AA14098@stork.lcs.mit.edu>
To: rivest, 6042-tas
Subject: 30% =/= 35%

   From: Derek W Truesdale <derekt@mit.edu>
   Date: Wed, 10 Apr 1996 21:19:24 EDT

   just thought I'd point out a potential bug in the final grading:

   tests are supposedly worth 30% of our grade, with one test worth 15%
   and two worth 10%.

   Derek.

Student makes a good point and deserves a reply.  Suggestions?

Thanks, A.


0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from kiwi.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA04850; Wed, 17 Apr 96 16:45:24 EDT
From: achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Andrew Chou)
Received: by kiwi.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA18531; Wed, 17 Apr 96 16:45:27 EDT
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 96 16:45:27 EDT
Message-Id: <199604172045.AA18531@kiwi.lcs.mit.edu>
To: 6042-teachers

PS 8 and PS7-solns are available.

-- Andrew


0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from stork.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA04969; Wed, 17 Apr 96 16:49:33 EDT
From: meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Albert R. Meyer)
Received: by stork.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA14119; Wed, 17 Apr 96 16:51:04 EDT
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 96 16:51:04 EDT
Message-Id: <199604172051.AA14119@stork.lcs.mit.edu>
To: 6042-teachers
Subject: [achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu: 30% =/= 35%]

From: achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Andrew Chou)
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 96 16:48:42 EDT
To: meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu
In-Reply-To: Albert R. Meyer's message of Wed, 17 Apr 96 16:37:14 EDT <199604172037.AA14098@stork.lcs.mit.edu>
Subject: 30% =/= 35%

Make each test worth 10% for a total of 30%.

-- Andrew



0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from dove.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA06497; Wed, 17 Apr 96 18:07:33 EDT
Received: from dove.lcs.mit.edu by dove.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA03622; Wed, 17 Apr 96 18:10:07 EDT
Message-Id: <199604172210.AA03622@dove.lcs.mit.edu>
X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.2 7/18/95
To: achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Andrew Chou)
Cc: 6042-teachers
In-Reply-To: Your message of Wed, 17 Apr 96 16:45:27 -0400.
             <199604172045.AA18531@kiwi.lcs.mit.edu> 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 96 18:10:07 -0400
From: kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu

> PS 8 and PS7-solns are available.
> 
> -- Andrew

I have made some corrections to PS 7 solutions, I have also renamed the files 
appropriately.

--Jakov



0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <miccianc@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from kingfisher.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA07886; Wed, 17 Apr 96 19:56:25 EDT
From: miccianc@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Daniele Micciancio)
Received: by kingfisher.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA12937; Wed, 17 Apr 96 20:02:38 EDT
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 96 20:02:38 EDT
Message-Id: <199604180002.AA12937@kingfisher.lcs.mit.edu>
To: 6042-teachers
Subject: Q2 solns


Quiz2 solutions are ready in Quiz2/H35-Q2Sols.{tex,dvi,ps}.

Daniele.



0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from swan.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA10057; Wed, 17 Apr 96 23:11:53 EDT
From: achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Andrew Chou)
Received: by swan.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA10631; Wed, 17 Apr 96 23:11:52 EDT
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 96 23:11:52 EDT
Message-Id: <199604180311.AA10631@swan.lcs.mit.edu>
To: arjuna@MIT.EDU, skyking@ai.mit.edu, root@einstein.mit.edu, sasha@MIT.EDU,
        alexj@media.mit.edu, fifo@MIT.EDU
Cc: 6042-teachers
Subject: Conflict final

Based upon your responses, everyone can take the conflict final on Wed
morning.  We'll schedule a conflict final then 

		Wed. May 22, 9-12am.

I don't know the room yet, but I'll let you know when I find out.

-- Andrew


0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from dove.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA21499; Thu, 18 Apr 96 12:16:51 EDT
Received: from dove.lcs.mit.edu by dove.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA05245; Thu, 18 Apr 96 12:19:26 EDT
Message-Id: <199604181619.AA05245@dove.lcs.mit.edu>
X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.2 7/18/95
To: 6042-teachers
Subject: Today's handouts
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 96 12:19:25 -0400
From: kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu


 - H34: The Quiz #2 stats are on the web and I'll make copies for the lecture.

 - H35: I made some changes to quiz 2 solutions (Quiz2/H35-...). Unless I hear 
otherwise, I'll make copies for the lecture.

 - H36: I also assume that PS 8 is fine as is, and I`ll make copies for the 
lecture.


--Jakov



0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <rivest@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from swan.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA22912; Thu, 18 Apr 96 13:24:19 EDT
From: rivest@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Ron Rivest)
Received: by swan.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA10939; Thu, 18 Apr 96 13:24:18 EDT
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 96 13:24:18 EDT
Message-Id: <199604181724.AA10939@swan.lcs.mit.edu>
To: 6042-teachers
Subject: Recitations for tomorrow


Basically, continue working on the foundations:

-- review their understanding of sample spaces, events, and probabilities

-- Work through carefully the example of "Three-Card Swindle":
	(See my lecture notes from 4/20/95...)

-- Independence:
	Argue carefully that if A and B are independent, 
		then so are not(A) and not(B)

	Argue carefully that if A, B, and C are independent, 
		then so are A and (B cup C)
		
	(See homework 10 from last fall.)

-- Bayes Rule:
	Given two urns, the first with one red and two black balls, and
                        the second with three red and two black balls

	Bob picks an urn by rolling a fair die: if it comes up 1 or 2,
           he picks the first urn.  Otherwise he picks the second urn.

	(a) What is the probability of him drawing a black ball?

	(b) What is the probability of him having picked urn 1, given
-1z            that he has drawn a black ball?


		


0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from kiwi.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA02750; Sat, 20 Apr 96 10:34:53 EDT
From: achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Andrew Chou)
Received: by kiwi.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA00245; Sat, 20 Apr 96 10:34:58 EDT
Date: Sat, 20 Apr 96 10:34:58 EDT
Message-Id: <199604201434.AA00245@kiwi.lcs.mit.edu>
To: 6042-teachers

Hi,

I won't be able to make the staff meeting on Tuesday.  I'll be
out of town.  Sorry about the late notice.  

One thing that needs to be discussed is drop date (next Friday).  I've
calculated projected grades in the spreadsheets.

-- Andrew

PS  I'll be back Wed for tutorials.


0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from stork.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA04734; Sat, 20 Apr 96 14:21:54 EDT
From: meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Albert R. Meyer)
Received: by stork.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA14969; Sat, 20 Apr 96 14:23:29 EDT
Date: Sat, 20 Apr 96 14:23:29 EDT
Message-Id: <199604201823.AA14969@stork.lcs.mit.edu>
To: 6042-tas
Subject: [chans@MIT.EDU: 6.042]

Who is her tutor/recitation instrucotr?  What are her grades?

Thanks, A.
--------------
To: meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu
Subject: 6.042
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 1996 16:55:39 EDT
From: Serena Chan <chans@MIT.EDU>


Hi,

I'm a student in your 6.042 class this term.  I would like to set
up a time to meet this week to talk about my considerations for
droppping the class.  I am available on Mondays after 3PM and on 
Tuesdays 1-2:30PM.  I would like to meet as early as possible, considering
that Drop Date is this coming friday.

Thank you.

Serena

--
Serena Chan
chans@mit.edu



1,,
Return-Path: <miccianc@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from kingfisher.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA07486; Sat, 20 Apr 96 18:47:50 EDT
From: miccianc@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Daniele Micciancio)
Received: by kingfisher.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA23236; Sat, 20 Apr 96 18:54:07 EDT
Date: Sat, 20 Apr 96 18:54:07 EDT
Message-Id: <199604202254.AA23236@kingfisher.lcs.mit.edu>
To: meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu
In-Reply-To: <199604201823.AA14969@stork.lcs.mit.edu> (meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu)
Subject: Re: [chans@MIT.EDU: 6.042]
Cc: 6042-tas

*** EOOH ***
From: miccianc@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Daniele Micciancio)
Date: Sat, 20 Apr 96 18:54:07 EDT
To: meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu
In-Reply-To: <199604201823.AA14969@stork.lcs.mit.edu> (meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu)
Subject: Re: [chans@MIT.EDU: 6.042]
Cc: 6042-tas


Serena Chan is in my/Andrew recitation and tutorial.
Her homework are almost ok: she got

Homework: 58/70, 44/60, 46/50, 46/70, 17/70, 53/60,

but she is performing very poorly at the quizes:

Quiz1 29, Quiz2 26.

She attended to all tutorials and
her projected score is 55.1, ranking 18 from the bottom.
She is a freshman and is taking the class pass/fail.

I have already talked with her and worked with her during 
my office hours.
It seems her problem at the quizes has been the time.
She is not very confident in her understanding of the 
material, and she told me that doing the homeworks
satisfactorily takes her a lot of time.
She does not collaborate with other students for 
the homeworks.

I think she is already working hard, and what she really needs is 
some more time to think about the material covered in the course.
I don't think she should drop the class, even if she is probably 
going to get a bad grade also in the third quiz,
but without knowing how decisions about pass/fail will be taken 
I couldn't give her advices about dropping the class, 
and I suggested her to get in touch with you.

Another student in a similar situation that asked me about dropping 
the class is Rikert Thomas.
Homeworks are ok, but he got 36 and 43 at the quizes.
Projected score is 55.0 ranking 17 from the bottom.
I think his chances to get a decent score in the 3rd quiz 
are much higher than for Serena, and I suggested him 
that he should not drop the class. 

Daniele





1,,
Return-Path: <meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from stork.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA16478; Sun, 21 Apr 96 11:32:32 EDT
From: meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Albert R. Meyer)
Received: by stork.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA15058; Sun, 21 Apr 96 11:34:07 EDT
Date: Sun, 21 Apr 96 11:34:07 EDT
Message-Id: <199604211534.AA15058@stork.lcs.mit.edu>
To: miccianc@theory.lcs.mit.edu
In-Reply-To: Daniele Micciancio's message of Sat, 20 Apr 96 18:54:07 EDT <199604202254.AA23236@kingfisher.lcs.mit.edu>
Subject: [chans@MIT.EDU: 6.042]
Cc: 6042-tas

*** EOOH ***
From: meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Albert R. Meyer)
Date: Sun, 21 Apr 96 11:34:07 EDT
To: miccianc@theory.lcs.mit.edu
In-Reply-To: Daniele Micciancio's message of Sat, 20 Apr 96 18:54:07 EDT <199604202254.AA23236@kingfisher.lcs.mit.edu>
Subject: [chans@MIT.EDU: 6.042]
Cc: 6042-tas

Thanks for the background on this student.

Has she done a tutorial presentation?   Is her lack of confidence in
her understanding of the material justified?

Regards, A.


1,,
Return-Path: <meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from stork.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA17165; Sun, 21 Apr 96 13:00:31 EDT
From: meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Albert R. Meyer)
Received: by stork.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA15096; Sun, 21 Apr 96 13:02:06 EDT
Date: Sun, 21 Apr 96 13:02:06 EDT
Message-Id: <199604211702.AA15096@stork.lcs.mit.edu>
To: derekt@mit.edu
Cc: 6042-teachers@theory.lcs.mit.edu
In-Reply-To: Derek W Truesdale's message of Wed, 10 Apr 1996 21:19:24 EDT <199604110119.VAA08990@le-mien.MIT.EDU>
Subject: grading.

*** EOOH ***
From: meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Albert R. Meyer)
Date: Sun, 21 Apr 96 13:02:06 EDT
To: derekt@mit.edu
Cc: 6042-teachers@theory.lcs.mit.edu
In-Reply-To: Derek W Truesdale's message of Wed, 10 Apr 1996 21:19:24 EDT <199604110119.VAA08990@le-mien.MIT.EDU>
Subject: grading.

   From: Derek W Truesdale <derekt@mit.edu>
   Date: Wed, 10 Apr 1996 21:19:24 EDT

   just thought I'd point out a potential bug in the final grading:

   tests are supposedly worth 30% of our grade, with one test worth 15%
   and two worth 10%.

   Derek.

More a typo than a bug :-)   Quizzes will count 10% each.
Thanks for pointing this out.

Regards, A.


1,,
Return-Path: <dsruhl@MIT.EDU>
Received: from MIT.EDU (SOUTH-STATION-ANNEX.MIT.EDU) by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA24355; Mon, 22 Apr 96 00:43:31 EDT
Received: from W20-575-110.MIT.EDU by MIT.EDU with SMTP
	id AA09236; Mon, 22 Apr 96 00:42:24 EDT
Received: by w20-575-110.MIT.EDU (5.0/4.7) id AA02510; Mon, 22 Apr 1996 00:43:31 -0400
Message-Id: <9604220443.AA02510@w20-575-110.MIT.EDU>
To: 6042-tas@theory.lcs.mit.edu
Subject: PS8 #6
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 1996 00:43:31 EDT
From: Dennis S Ruhl <dsruhl@MIT.EDU>
Content-Length: 110

*** EOOH ***
To: 6042-tas@theory.lcs.mit.edu
Subject: PS8 #6
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 1996 00:43:31 EDT
From: Dennis S Ruhl <dsruhl@MIT.EDU>

For part b, when you opt to switch to another door do you chose at random which
door?


Thanks,


Dennis Ruhl


1,,
Return-Path: <miccianc@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from peregrine.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA01364; Mon, 22 Apr 96 09:28:06 EDT
From: miccianc@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Daniele Micciancio)
Received: by peregrine.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA08779; Mon, 22 Apr 96 09:32:29 EDT
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 96 09:32:29 EDT
Message-Id: <199604221332.AA08779@peregrine.lcs.mit.edu>
To: meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu
In-Reply-To: <199604211534.AA15058@stork.lcs.mit.edu> (meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu)
Subject: Re: [chans@MIT.EDU: 6.042]
Cc: 6042-tas

*** EOOH ***
From: miccianc@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Daniele Micciancio)
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 96 09:32:29 EDT
To: meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu
In-Reply-To: <199604211534.AA15058@stork.lcs.mit.edu> (meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu)
Subject: Re: [chans@MIT.EDU: 6.042]
Cc: 6042-tas


> Has she done a tutorial presentation?   Is her lack of confidence in
> her understanding of the material justified?

she is in the 12:00 tutorial, in which I alternate with Andrew.
I heard her only once. I don't remember exactly how it went,
but it was ok.


daniele 


1,,
Return-Path: <kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from dove.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA03187; Mon, 22 Apr 96 10:48:12 EDT
Received: from dove.lcs.mit.edu by dove.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA09301; Mon, 22 Apr 96 10:50:48 EDT
Message-Id: <199604221450.AA09301@dove.lcs.mit.edu>
X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.2 7/18/95
To: Dennis S Ruhl <dsruhl@MIT.EDU>
Cc: 6042-tas@theory.lcs.mit.edu
Subject: Re: PS8 #6 
In-Reply-To: Your message of Mon, 22 Apr 96 00:43:31 -0400.
             <9604220443.AA02510@w20-575-110.MIT.EDU> 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 96 10:50:48 -0400
From: kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu

*** EOOH ***
X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.2 7/18/95
To: Dennis S Ruhl <dsruhl@MIT.EDU>
Cc: 6042-tas@theory.lcs.mit.edu
Subject: Re: PS8 #6 
In-Reply-To: Your message of Mon, 22 Apr 96 00:43:31 -0400.
             <9604220443.AA02510@w20-575-110.MIT.EDU> 
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 96 10:50:48 -0400
From: kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu


> For part b, when you opt to switch to another door do you chose at random which
> door?
> 

Correct.
--Jakov



1,,
Return-Path: <meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from stork.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA09970; Mon, 22 Apr 96 15:42:05 EDT
From: meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Albert R. Meyer)
Received: by stork.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA01351; Mon, 22 Apr 96 15:43:40 EDT
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 96 15:43:40 EDT
Message-Id: <199604221943.AA01351@stork.lcs.mit.edu>
To: chans@MIT.EDU
In-Reply-To: Serena Chan's message of Mon, 22 Apr 1996 15:37:55 EDT <199604221937.PAA00232@cybele.mit.edu>
Subject: 6.042 
Cc: 6042-teachers

*** EOOH ***
From: meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Albert R. Meyer)
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 96 15:43:40 EDT
To: chans@MIT.EDU
In-Reply-To: Serena Chan's message of Mon, 22 Apr 1996 15:37:55 EDT <199604221937.PAA00232@cybele.mit.edu>
Subject: 6.042 
Cc: 6042-teachers

   Date: Mon, 22 Apr 1996 15:37:55 EDT
   From: Serena Chan <chans@MIT.EDU>


   Hi,

   Please disregard the last message.  I have decided that it is best for me
   to drop the course and to retake it at another time.  Sorry for any
   inconvience.

   Serena

   --
   Serena Chan
   chans@mit.edu

Sorry to lose you from 6.042.  I'd be happy to arrange to talk with you
promptly about this should you wish to reconsider.

Yours truly,
Prof. Albert R. Meyer
MIT Lab. for Computer Science 


0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from dove.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA28981; Tue, 23 Apr 96 13:11:24 EDT
Received: from dove.lcs.mit.edu by dove.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA01679; Tue, 23 Apr 96 13:14:02 EDT
Message-Id: <199604231714.AA01679@dove.lcs.mit.edu>
X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.2 7/18/95
To: 6042-teachers
Subject: warning letter
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 96 13:14:02 -0400
From: kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu


here is a draft of the warning letter for the students with C- (rank 86-99)
--Jakov

%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

Dear XXX,

Your performance thus far indicates you are likely to get a "C-" in the 
course. In particular you rank XX out of 110 students in the class.

Please note that this is *only an estimate* of your grade, based on the data 
we have (including problem set 6 and quiz 2 grades).

If you have any further questions about your grade, please do not hesitate to 
talk to any of the TAs or professors.

Sincerely,
--Jakov Kucan

%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%



0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from dove.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA29067; Tue, 23 Apr 96 13:14:45 EDT
Received: from dove.lcs.mit.edu by dove.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA01698; Tue, 23 Apr 96 13:17:23 EDT
Message-Id: <199604231717.AA01698@dove.lcs.mit.edu>
X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.2 7/18/95
To: 6042-teachers
Subject: warning letter #2
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 96 13:17:23 -0400
From: kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu



here is a draft of the warning letter for the students with D and F (rank 
100-110)

--Jakov

%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

Dear XXX,

Your performance thus far indicates you are likely to get a "D" or an "F" in 
the course, and are at risk of failing the course. In particular you rank XX 
out of 110 students in the class.

If you have any further questions about your grade, please do not hesitate to 
talk to any of the TAs or professors.

Sincerely,
--Jakov Kucan

%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%





0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <parry@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from woodpecker.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA29174; Tue, 23 Apr 96 13:15:21 EDT
Received: from woodpecker.lcs.mit.edu by woodpecker.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA00948; Tue, 23 Apr 96 13:18:09 EDT
Message-Id: <199604231718.AA00948@woodpecker.lcs.mit.edu>
To: 6042-teachers
Subject: Tutorial 11
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 96 13:18:09 -0400
From: parry@theory.lcs.mit.edu

is drafted in the Tutorials subdirectory.

Parry



0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from dove.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA29258; Tue, 23 Apr 96 13:20:13 EDT
Received: from dove.lcs.mit.edu by dove.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA01739; Tue, 23 Apr 96 13:22:51 EDT
Message-Id: <199604231722.AA01739@dove.lcs.mit.edu>
X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.2 7/18/95
To: 6042-teachers
Subject: letter #3
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 96 13:22:50 -0400
From: kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu


this is for students who are still on the registrar's list but seem to have 
dropped the course.

--Jakov


%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

Dear XXX,

Our records suggest you have dropped the class, but you are still listed as 
registered (according to registrar's data dated 3/13/96).

If you have any further questions about your grade, please do not hesitate to 
talk to any of the TAs or professors.

Sincerely,
--Jakov Kucan

%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%







0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from stork.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA29809; Tue, 23 Apr 96 13:48:01 EDT
From: meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Albert R. Meyer)
Received: by stork.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA02308; Tue, 23 Apr 96 13:49:37 EDT
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 96 13:49:37 EDT
Message-Id: <199604231749.AA02308@stork.lcs.mit.edu>
To: kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu
Cc: 6042-teachers
In-Reply-To: kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu's message of Tue, 23 Apr 96 13:14:02 -0400 <199604231714.AA01679@dove.lcs.mit.edu>
Subject: warning letter

Slightly revised:

   Dear XXX,

   The 6.042J/18.063J staff wants you to be aware that
   your performance to date in the course would merit a letter grade of
   approximately "C-".  In particular you rank XX out of 110 students in
   the class.

   Note that this is *only an estimate* of your grade, based on the data 
   we have (including problem sets 1--6 and the first two quizzes).

   If you have any questions or would like to discuss this further, we
   encourage you to talk to any of the TAs or Professors.

   Sincerely,

   Jakov Kucan,
   Teaching Assistant




0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from stork.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA29870; Tue, 23 Apr 96 13:50:35 EDT
From: meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Albert R. Meyer)
Received: by stork.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA02316; Tue, 23 Apr 96 13:52:11 EDT
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 96 13:52:11 EDT
Message-Id: <199604231752.AA02316@stork.lcs.mit.edu>
To: kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu
In-Reply-To: kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu's message of Tue, 23 Apr 96 13:22:50 -0400 <199604231722.AA01739@dove.lcs.mit.edu>
Subject: letter #3
Cc: 6042-teachers

   X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.2 7/18/95
   Date: Tue, 23 Apr 96 13:22:50 -0400
   From: kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu


   this is for students who are still on the registrar's list but seem to have 
   dropped the course.

   --Jakov


   %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

   Dear XXX,

   Our records suggest you have dropped the class, but you are still listed as 
   registered (according to registrar's data dated 3/13/96).

   If you are, in fact, planning to take the course for credit, please let
   us know immmediately.

   Thank you,
   Jakov Kucan,
   Teaching Assistant

   %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%


0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <miccianc@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from kingfisher.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA00558; Tue, 23 Apr 96 14:14:06 EDT
From: miccianc@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Daniele Micciancio)
Received: by kingfisher.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA02986; Tue, 23 Apr 96 14:20:26 EDT
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 96 14:20:26 EDT
Message-Id: <199604231820.AA02986@kingfisher.lcs.mit.edu>
To: 6042-teachers
Subject: PS9


a possible selection of problems for 
Homework 9 is in Pset9.{tex,dvi}.

Daniele



0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <parry@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from woodpecker.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA05437; Tue, 23 Apr 96 18:01:08 EDT
Received: from woodpecker.lcs.mit.edu by woodpecker.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA01436; Tue, 23 Apr 96 18:03:57 EDT
Message-Id: <199604232203.AA01436@woodpecker.lcs.mit.edu>
To: 6042-teachers
Subject: Revised tutorial 11 problems
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 96 18:03:56 -0400
From: parry@theory.lcs.mit.edu

Are in H39-* in the Tutorials subdirectory.

Parry


0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from dove.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA06461; Tue, 23 Apr 96 19:02:13 EDT
Received: from dove.lcs.mit.edu by dove.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA02289; Tue, 23 Apr 96 19:04:51 EDT
Message-Id: <199604232304.AA02289@dove.lcs.mit.edu>
X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.2 7/18/95
To: 6042-teachers
Subject: tutorial 11
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 96 19:04:46 -0400
From: kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu


I've made as slight change in wording of problem one to make it less ambiguous.

I frazed the quiestion 

"Show that the probability of drawing a sequence of $t$ balls, so that
 the last ball is black is $b/(b+r)$."

--Jakov




0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from dove.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA22870; Wed, 24 Apr 96 14:55:16 EDT
Received: from dove.lcs.mit.edu by dove.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA03875; Wed, 24 Apr 96 14:57:54 EDT
Message-Id: <199604241857.AA03875@dove.lcs.mit.edu>
X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.2 7/18/95
To: 6042-teachers
Subject: a student's case...
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 96 14:56:42 -0400
From: kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu


A student called me to ask if he has a chance of passing. He has only been to 
3 tutorials, and has not turned in any of the homeworks (only ps7 which is not 
graded yet). His perfomance on the quizes is around 50%.

I told him if he did better on the remaining quiz and the final, and did well 
on the problem sets he would probably pass, but that I wanted to check with 
the Professors in the course before giving a definite answer.

I also asked him if there were any special circumstances we should consider, 
but there weren't any.

My questions are:

	(1) Do we mind passing someone who practically blew off first two thirds of 
the course (no tutorials/no problem sets), but did OK on the tests?

	(2) Do we mind giving a C to such a student, provided he aces the rest of the 
tests?

My answer would be NO to both quiestions (i.e. he could get a C), but I'd like 
other's opinions before giving a definite answer to the student.


Thanks,
--Jakov



0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from swan.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA23633; Wed, 24 Apr 96 15:30:03 EDT
From: achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Andrew Chou)
Received: by swan.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA01295; Wed, 24 Apr 96 15:30:03 EDT
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 96 15:30:03 EDT
Message-Id: <199604241930.AA01295@swan.lcs.mit.edu>
To: 6042-teachers
Subject: a student's case ...

I think we should just use our standard grading system on this guy.

It's one thing to force someone who knows the material to grunge
through a course that's repetitive for him.  I agree that there should
be mechanisms for him to place out of the course.

But, this guy is not acing the quizzes.  50's on the quizzes is a C,
and missing all the other stuff is a definite fail.

It's not real fair to the other students to change the grading system
for him.  If he aces the rest of the quizzes, and his final grade is a
C, then fine.  Otherwise, he should fail.  He blew us off; and he
hasn't shown mastery of the material, so why should we accomodate him?

Anyways, that's my preference, though if the rest of you feel differently,
that's fine too.

-- Andrew


0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from dove.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA23771; Wed, 24 Apr 96 15:37:04 EDT
Received: from dove.lcs.mit.edu by dove.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA04020; Wed, 24 Apr 96 15:39:42 EDT
Message-Id: <199604241939.AA04020@dove.lcs.mit.edu>
X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.2 7/18/95
To: achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Andrew Chou)
Cc: 6042-teachers
Subject: Re: a student's case ... 
In-Reply-To: Your message of Wed, 24 Apr 96 15:30:03 -0400.
             <199604241930.AA01295@swan.lcs.mit.edu> 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 96 15:39:42 -0400
From: kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu


> [...]
> 
> It's not real fair to the other students to change the grading system
> for him.  If he aces the rest of the quizzes, and his final grade is a
> C, then fine.  Otherwise, he should fail.  He blew us off; and he
> hasn't shown mastery of the material, so why should we accomodate him?
> 

Andrew,

You must have misunderstood me. I wasn't sugessting we give this guy a C, 
UNLESS his total score is worth a C. I only raised the issue whether he could 
get a C at all, considering he blew off most of the class.

--Jakov





0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from stork.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA24301; Wed, 24 Apr 96 16:04:52 EDT
From: meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Albert R. Meyer)
Received: by stork.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA03215; Wed, 24 Apr 96 16:06:29 EDT
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 96 16:06:29 EDT
Message-Id: <199604242006.AA03215@stork.lcs.mit.edu>
To: lcshih@mit.edu
Subject: 6.042J/18.062J Underground Guide evaluation
Cc: 6042-teachers

Thursday, May 2 at 2:30--2:45 (the beginning of lecture) would be the best
time for an Underground Guide evaluation.

Yours truly,
Prof. Albert R. Meyer
MIT Lab. for Computer Science


0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <rivest@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from swan.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA09149; Thu, 25 Apr 96 10:12:35 EDT
From: rivest@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Ron Rivest)
Received: by swan.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA01889; Thu, 25 Apr 96 10:12:34 EDT
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 96 10:12:34 EDT
Message-Id: <199604251412.AA01889@swan.lcs.mit.edu>
To: 6042-teachers
Subject: Homework 9


I made some revisions to Pset9; please check them over, add the due date,
and print up for class...

	Thanks,
	Ron


0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <miccianc@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from kingfisher.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA09594; Thu, 25 Apr 96 10:31:51 EDT
From: miccianc@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Daniele Micciancio)
Received: by kingfisher.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA10221; Thu, 25 Apr 96 10:38:12 EDT
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 96 10:38:12 EDT
Message-Id: <199604251438.AA10221@kingfisher.lcs.mit.edu>
To: 6042-teachers
In-Reply-To: <199604251412.AA01889@swan.lcs.mit.edu> (rivest@theory.lcs.mit.edu)
Subject: Re: Homework 9


I'll check and make copies of problem set 9.

Thanks,
Daniele



0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <rivest@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from swan.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA13755; Thu, 25 Apr 96 14:11:00 EDT
From: rivest@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Ron Rivest)
Received: by swan.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA02081; Thu, 25 Apr 96 14:11:00 EDT
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 96 14:11:00 EDT
Message-Id: <199604251811.AA02081@swan.lcs.mit.edu>
To: 6042-teachers
Subject: Handouts


Rather than having the lectures transcribed for the remaining portion of the
course, I propose that we hand out the lecture notes from Fall '95 
when Karger/Leighton taught this material.  Specifically, I propose that
we hand out their "Notes 19" (Handout 49) to "Notes 26" (Handout 63).

Notes 19-23 can be handed out immediately, and the remainder can wait a
little bit.

These should be reformatted, of course, to be consistent with our handout
numberings, but should indicate that Karger/Leighton are the authors.

Can someone take care of this, so that we get the 19-23 handout ready for
Tuesday?

	Thanks,
	Ron



0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <miccianc@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from kingfisher.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA11283; Fri, 26 Apr 96 18:42:54 EDT
From: miccianc@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Daniele Micciancio)
Received: by kingfisher.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA16137; Fri, 26 Apr 96 18:49:17 EDT
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 96 18:49:17 EDT
Message-Id: <199604262249.AA16137@kingfisher.lcs.mit.edu>
To: 6042-tas
Subject: pset8 sols


I revised the solution of problem 4 in Hxx-Soln8.tex.
Please, proof check it and say if it is satisfactory.

Daniele








0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from swan.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA23097; Sat, 27 Apr 96 15:25:46 EDT
From: achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Andrew Chou)
Received: by swan.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA03637; Sat, 27 Apr 96 15:25:46 EDT
Date: Sat, 27 Apr 96 15:25:46 EDT
Message-Id: <199604271925.AA03637@swan.lcs.mit.edu>
To: 6042-tas

What's the deal with PS8 solns?  Where's the latest complete version?
I looked in the current directory, and Hxx-Soln8 seems incomplete
to me.

-- Andrew


0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <miccianc@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from woodpecker.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA23219; Sat, 27 Apr 96 15:40:26 EDT
From: miccianc@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Daniele Micciancio)
Received: by woodpecker.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA06708; Sat, 27 Apr 96 15:43:16 EDT
Date: Sat, 27 Apr 96 15:43:16 EDT
Message-Id: <199604271943.AA06708@woodpecker.lcs.mit.edu>
To: achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu
In-Reply-To: Andrew Chou's message of Sat, 27 Apr 96 15:25:46 EDT <199604271925.AA03637@swan.lcs.mit.edu>
Cc: 6042-tas


In problem 4 there was an error about how the sentence
"the lecturer and TA answer independently".
I made the correction also explaining the problem.
I wanted to know, mainly from Jakov and Parry with 
whom a discussed the problem, if the explanation 
was ok.

What do you mean with Hxx-Soln8 seems incomplete?
Are you referring to problem 4 or to something else?

Daniele


0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from swan.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA23290; Sat, 27 Apr 96 15:47:36 EDT
From: achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Andrew Chou)
Received: by swan.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA03665; Sat, 27 Apr 96 15:47:35 EDT
Date: Sat, 27 Apr 96 15:47:35 EDT
Message-Id: <199604271947.AA03665@swan.lcs.mit.edu>
To: 6042-tas
In-Reply-To: Daniele Micciancio's message of Sat, 27 Apr 96 15:43:16 EDT <199604271943.AA06708@woodpecker.lcs.mit.edu>

Ok.  The dvi file didn't have problem 5 or 6. It was just
that the \end{document} was premature. 
It's ok now.

-- Andrew


0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from swan.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA24608; Sat, 27 Apr 96 18:13:16 EDT
From: achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Andrew Chou)
Received: by swan.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA03726; Sat, 27 Apr 96 18:13:16 EDT
Date: Sat, 27 Apr 96 18:13:16 EDT
Message-Id: <199604272213.AA03726@swan.lcs.mit.edu>
To: 6042-tas

There is an error in problem 2.  It should be {8 \choose 3} not
{8 \choose 2}  One of the graders pointed this out.

-- Andrew


0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <parry@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from woodpecker.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA26207; Sat, 27 Apr 96 21:58:59 EDT
Received: from woodpecker.lcs.mit.edu by woodpecker.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA07225; Sat, 27 Apr 96 22:01:50 EDT
Message-Id: <199604280201.AA07225@woodpecker.lcs.mit.edu>
To: 6042-tas
Subject: Soln8
Date: Sat, 27 Apr 96 22:01:49 -0400
From: parry@theory.lcs.mit.edu

I look at the latest version.  It seems to be ok (Famous last words :-)
I added a short sentence of clarification to the last problem.

Parry


0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from dove.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA25461; Mon, 29 Apr 96 16:36:14 EDT
Received: from dove.lcs.mit.edu by dove.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA10572; Mon, 29 Apr 96 16:38:55 EDT
Message-Id: <199604292038.AA10572@dove.lcs.mit.edu>
X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.2 7/18/95
To: 6042-teachers
Subject: grades
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 96 16:38:55 -0400
From: kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu


are in ascii format in Grades/grades.txt

(the other file is the spreadsheet backup in binary (password protected))

--Jakov



0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from swan.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA17552; Tue, 30 Apr 96 12:55:50 EDT
From: achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Andrew Chou)
Received: by swan.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA04778; Tue, 30 Apr 96 12:55:49 EDT
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 96 12:55:49 EDT
Message-Id: <199604301655.AA04778@swan.lcs.mit.edu>
To: 6042-teachers
Subject: tut 12

Tutorial 12 is ready.

-- Andrew


0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from kiwi.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA13504; Wed, 01 May 96 16:14:49 EDT
From: achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Andrew Chou)
Received: by kiwi.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA13265; Wed, 01 May 96 16:14:51 EDT
Date: Wed, 01 May 96 16:14:51 EDT
Message-Id: <199605012014.AA13265@kiwi.lcs.mit.edu>
To: 6042-forum
Subject: Quiz 3 Announcement

Quiz 3 will be 

	Tuesday, May 7
	2:30 - 4:00 PM  (DURING CLASS TIME)
	** WALKER ** 

Please note the location and time.

As usual, it is open book and open notes.  No electronic devices.
It covers material through and including lecture on April 30 (i.e.
variance and covariance)

Since the quiz is during class time, there should not be any conflicts.




0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from kiwi.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA14422; Wed, 01 May 96 16:52:39 EDT
From: achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Andrew Chou)
Received: by kiwi.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA13327; Wed, 01 May 96 16:52:43 EDT
Date: Wed, 01 May 96 16:52:43 EDT
Message-Id: <199605012052.AA13327@kiwi.lcs.mit.edu>
To: 6042-teachers
Subject: Quiz 2 grader

Who graded 1a from quiz 2?  A student had a question.

-- Andrew


0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from dove.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA15498; Wed, 01 May 96 17:49:25 EDT
Received: from dove.lcs.mit.edu by dove.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA14070; Wed, 01 May 96 17:52:08 EDT
Message-Id: <199605012152.AA14070@dove.lcs.mit.edu>
X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.2 7/18/95
To: achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Andrew Chou)
Cc: 6042-teachers
Subject: Re: Quiz 2 grader 
In-Reply-To: Your message of Wed, 01 May 96 16:52:43 -0400.
             <199605012052.AA13327@kiwi.lcs.mit.edu> 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Wed, 01 May 96 17:52:08 -0400
From: kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu


> Who graded 1a from quiz 2?  A student had a question.
> 
> -- Andrew

I did.

--Jakov



0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <miccianc@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from kingfisher.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA16756; Wed, 01 May 96 18:56:02 EDT
From: miccianc@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Daniele Micciancio)
Received: by kingfisher.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA02578; Wed, 01 May 96 19:02:31 EDT
Date: Wed, 01 May 96 19:02:31 EDT
Message-Id: <199605012302.AA02578@kingfisher.lcs.mit.edu>
To: 6042-teachers
Subject: Quiz 3


I put two problems on Markov inequality
in q3-daniele.tex for use either in quiz3 
or in recitation on friday.

Daniele


0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from dove.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA16974; Wed, 01 May 96 19:09:40 EDT
Received: from dove.lcs.mit.edu by dove.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA14262; Wed, 01 May 96 19:12:23 EDT
Message-Id: <199605012312.AA14262@dove.lcs.mit.edu>
X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.2 7/18/95
To: 6042-teachers
Subject: Re: Quiz 3 
Date: Wed, 01 May 96 19:12:23 -0400
From: kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu


I drafted a quiz question in q3-jakov.tex

--Jakov



0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from stork.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA00850; Thu, 02 May 96 11:48:26 EDT
From: meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Albert R. Meyer)
Received: by stork.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA08265; Thu, 02 May 96 11:50:09 EDT
Date: Thu, 02 May 96 11:50:09 EDT
Message-Id: <199605021550.AA08265@stork.lcs.mit.edu>
To: 6042-teachers
Subject: not in today

I can't make lecture today.  Will be available by email late this
afternoon.

Regards, A.


0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <cyruse@MIT.EDU>
Received: from MIT.EDU (SOUTH-STATION-ANNEX.MIT.EDU) by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA02469; Thu, 02 May 96 12:59:16 EDT
Received: from M66-080-12.MIT.EDU by MIT.EDU with SMTP
	id AA23130; Thu, 2 May 96 12:58:01 EDT
Received: by m66-080-12.MIT.EDU (931110.SGI/4.7) id AA13153; Thu, 2 May 96 12:59:14 -0400
Date: Thu, 2 May 96 12:59:14 -0400
Message-Id: <9605021659.AA13153@m66-080-12.MIT.EDU>
From: Cyrus R Eyster <cyruse@MIT.EDU>
To: 6042-lecturers@theory.lcs.mit.edu, 6042-tas@theory.lcs.mit.edu
Subject: Trouble retrieving PS9

I tried to get the PostScript version of Problem Set 9 for 6.042 from the web 
page, but got numerous errors from GhostView. I also tried directly ftp'ing
it, but got errors again. I was surprised to find that I couldn't load 
several other of the handouts successfully from the web page.


Cyrus Eyster
cyruse@mit.edu



0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from dove.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA03194; Thu, 02 May 96 13:22:59 EDT
Received: from dove.lcs.mit.edu by dove.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA15020; Thu, 02 May 96 13:25:42 EDT
Message-Id: <199605021725.AA15020@dove.lcs.mit.edu>
X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.2 7/18/95
To: 6042-tas
Subject: a draft of ps 9 solutions is ready
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Thu, 02 May 96 13:25:41 -0400
From: kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu


in Hxx-Soln9.*

--Jakov



0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <rivest@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from swan.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA03377; Thu, 02 May 96 13:33:33 EDT
From: rivest@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Ron Rivest)
Received: by swan.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA05742; Thu, 02 May 96 13:33:32 EDT
Date: Thu, 02 May 96 13:33:32 EDT
Message-Id: <199605021733.AA05742@swan.lcs.mit.edu>
To: 6042-teachers
Subject: Recitation tomorrow


Review for quiz. 

Suggestions:

(1) 6.042 Quiz 2 from Fall 94, Problem 5 (tossing three fair coins).

(2) 6.042 Quiz 2 from Fall 94, Problem 7 (werewolf genetics).

(3) 6.042 Handout 42 (practice problems) Problem 19. (Z = max(X,Y))

(4) Let f be a function chosen at random mapping {1,2,3,4} into itself.
    What is the probability that |range(f)| = 2, given that range(f)!=4 ?


	Ron





0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from dove.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA03482; Thu, 02 May 96 13:39:38 EDT
Received: from dove.lcs.mit.edu by dove.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA15080; Thu, 02 May 96 13:42:21 EDT
Message-Id: <199605021742.AA15080@dove.lcs.mit.edu>
X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.2 7/18/95
To: Cyrus R Eyster <cyruse@MIT.EDU>
Cc: 6042-lecturers@theory.lcs.mit.edu, 6042-tas@theory.lcs.mit.edu
Subject: Re: Trouble retrieving PS9 
In-Reply-To: Your message of Thu, 02 May 96 12:59:14 -0400.
             <9605021659.AA13153@m66-080-12.MIT.EDU> 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Thu, 02 May 96 13:42:21 -0400
From: kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu


> I tried to get the PostScript version of Problem Set 9 for 6.042 from the web 
> page, but got numerous errors from GhostView. I also tried directly ftp'ing
> it, but got errors again. I was surprised to find that I couldn't load 
> several other of the handouts successfully from the web page.
> 
> 
> Cyrus Eyster
> cyruse@mit.edu
> 

I tried viewing the file (handout 39: PS 9) both on athena and theory with 
ghostview and I had no problems. If you still have problems accessing the 
file, I have some hard copies in the office.

--Jakov



0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <rivest@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from swan.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA19781; Fri, 03 May 96 09:11:02 EDT
From: rivest@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Ron Rivest)
Received: by swan.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA06118; Fri, 03 May 96 09:11:01 EDT
Date: Fri, 03 May 96 09:11:01 EDT
Message-Id: <199605031311.AA06118@swan.lcs.mit.edu>
To: parry, 6042-teachers
Subject: [parry@theory.lcs.mit.edu: Re: Recitation tomorrow ]


The latter... sorry....

Return-Path: <parry@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
To: rivest@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Ron Rivest)
Cc: miccianc
Subject: Re: Recitation tomorrow 
In-Reply-To: Your message of Thu, 02 May 96 13:33:32 -0400.
             <199605021733.AA05742@swan.lcs.mit.edu> 
Date: Fri, 03 May 96 03:35:27 -0400
From: parry@theory.lcs.mit.edu


    (4) Let f be a function chosen at random mapping {1,2,3,4} into itself.
        What is the probability that |range(f)| = 2, given that range(f)!=4 ?


    	Ron

Is that 4 is not in range(f) or |range(f)| != 4?




0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from phoenix.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA21096; Fri, 03 May 96 10:20:13 EDT
From: achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Andrew Chou)
Received: by phoenix.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA02995; Fri, 03 May 96 10:26:35 EDT
Date: Fri, 03 May 96 10:26:35 EDT
Message-Id: <199605031426.AA02995@phoenix.lcs.mit.edu>
To: 6042-forum
Subject: Pre-quiz office hours

The TA's have modified their office hours in advance of the quiz.

Office hours for next week are:

Mon 	1-3	Jakov	NE43-334
Mon	2-4	Parry	NE43-334
Mon 	3-5	Andrew	NE43-311
Mon 	5-7	Daniele	NE43-368


0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from stork.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA28348; Fri, 03 May 96 16:26:27 EDT
From: meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Albert R. Meyer)
Received: by stork.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA09196; Fri, 03 May 96 16:28:11 EDT
Date: Fri, 03 May 96 16:28:11 EDT
Message-Id: <199605032028.AA09196@stork.lcs.mit.edu>
To: brainiac@MIT.EDU
In-Reply-To: Jack I Fu's message of Fri, 03 May 1996 11:04:58 EDT <199605031504.LAA15858@ringworld.MIT.EDU>
Subject: 6.042 missed evaluation...
Cc: 6042-teachers

   From: Jack I Fu <brainiac@MIT.EDU>
   Date: Fri, 03 May 1996 11:04:58 EDT

   Dear Professor Meyer,

     My name is Jack Fu, and I was supposed to show up at your 6.042J
   class yesterday to do HKN evaluation. I am very sorry that I missed
   it, but I got really sick mid-morning and couldn't go anywhere all
   day (too many all-nighters). I hope for your understanding, and
   hope that you will be able to allow us to take another 15 minutes
   of your lecture time to do evaluations? anytime next week is fine
   with me.

     Thank you very much, and once again, I'm very sorry to not have
   shown up for evaluations. :(

   Sincerely,

   Jack Fu
   MIT '96

OK, do the evaluation at lecture Thurs, May 9 at 2:35--2:50.  Let me know
if that's a problem.

Yours truly,
Prof. Albert R. Meyer
MIT Lab. for Computer Science


0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from stork.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA02641; Fri, 03 May 96 21:15:26 EDT
From: meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Albert R. Meyer)
Received: by stork.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA09395; Fri, 03 May 96 21:17:11 EDT
Date: Fri, 03 May 96 21:17:11 EDT
Message-Id: <199605040117.AA09395@stork.lcs.mit.edu>
To: 6042-teachers
Subject: [brainiac@MIT.EDU: Re: 6.042 missed evaluation... ]

From: Jack I Fu <brainiac@MIT.EDU>
To: meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Albert R. Meyer)
Cc: brainiac@MIT.EDU
Subject: Re: 6.042 missed evaluation... 
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 03 May 1996 16:28:11 EDT."
             <199605032028.AA09196@stork.lcs.mit.edu> 
Date: Fri, 03 May 1996 21:02:49 EDT

Hello Professor Meyer:

  So that's next Thursday, at the beginning of your 6.042J class
at 2:35? That is fine with me. I will be there.

  Thank you very much.

Sincerely,

Jack Fu
MIT '96



0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <parry@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from woodpecker.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA09142; Sat, 04 May 96 05:49:17 EDT
Received: from woodpecker.lcs.mit.edu by woodpecker.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA07546; Sat, 04 May 96 05:52:12 EDT
Message-Id: <199605040952.AA07546@woodpecker.lcs.mit.edu>
To: 6042-teachers
Subject: Some quiz problems
Date: Sat, 04 May 96 05:52:11 -0400
From: parry@theory.lcs.mit.edu

I added some to q3-parry.tex.  By the way, what's the final word on the
student with jury duty?  Are we going to just average the other two?

Parry


0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <jessek@mit.edu>
Received: from MINDCRIME.MIT.EDU by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA11392; Sat, 04 May 96 10:47:30 EDT
Received: from localhost (jessek@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mindcrime.mit.edu (8.6.12/8.6.9) with SMTP id KAA00819; Sat, 4 May 1996 10:47:45 -0400
Date: Sat, 4 May 1996 10:47:41 -0400 (EDT)
From: Jesse Kornblum <jessek@mit.edu>
To: 6042-lecturers@theory.lcs.mit.edu
Cc: 6042-tas@theory.lcs.mit.edu
Subject: Final Exam Conflicts
Message-Id: <Pine.LNX.3.93.960504104528.816A-100000@mindcrime.mit.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII


I have been assigned an exam for 7.013 by the Registrar as a conflict
for an exam earlier in the week. This exam is to be Friday morning during
finals week, which will conflict with the 6.042 exam. Is there going to
be a conflict exam? The Registrar said that you were responsible for
resolving any conflicts.

Thank you,

Jesse Kornblum
------------------------------------------------------------------------
403 Memorial Drive  - DKE        |       TWO DOES NOT EQUAL THREE
Cambridge, MA 02139-4397  USA    | (Except for very large values of two)
Phone: 617-494-5419       http://web.mit.edu/jessek/www/home.html



0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from kiwi.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA16144; Sat, 04 May 96 17:54:31 EDT
From: achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Andrew Chou)
Received: by kiwi.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA14276; Sat, 04 May 96 17:54:33 EDT
Date: Sat, 04 May 96 17:54:33 EDT
Message-Id: <199605042154.AA14276@kiwi.lcs.mit.edu>
To: jessek@mit.edu
Cc: 6042-teachers
In-Reply-To: Jesse Kornblum's message of Sat, 4 May 1996 10:47:41 -0400 (EDT) <Pine.LNX.3.93.960504104528.816A-100000@mindcrime.mit.edu>
Subject: Final Exam Conflicts

We have a conflict exam scheduled at Wed AM in 24-206.  Can you make
that time?

-- Andrew


0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from stork.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA00949; Sun, 05 May 96 19:29:30 EDT
From: meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Albert R. Meyer)
Received: by stork.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA10146; Sun, 05 May 96 19:31:16 EDT
Date: Sun, 05 May 96 19:31:16 EDT
Message-Id: <199605052331.AA10146@stork.lcs.mit.edu>
To: 6042-teachers
Subject: q3 comments

Prob 1 is just right.

Prob 2 is ok, but if need be, could be shortened by eliminating part (b).

Prob 3: I got (b) by mindless manipulation using (a); I presume there's
some more direct way to see it.  Parts (c) and (d) are not crisp enough.
We'll have trouble deciding how to grade various possible unintended
answers.

Prob 4: Again, I got (b) by mindless manipulation.  May cut (b)?

Prob 5: Not sure I go this.

More after dinner...

Regards, A.


0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from kiwi.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA02277; Sun, 05 May 96 21:22:01 EDT
From: achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Andrew Chou)
Received: by kiwi.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA14377; Sun, 05 May 96 21:22:06 EDT
Date: Sun, 05 May 96 21:22:06 EDT
Message-Id: <199605060122.AA14377@kiwi.lcs.mit.edu>
To: 6042-teachers

For the most part, I agree with Albert's comments.  

I don't like 4(b) (no offense to the author)  It's mindless to prove, and
it doesn't seem like an interesting problem.

Is 5 supposed to have a slick answer?  You can't do balls and bins and
then rotate.  Partition numbers don't work that nicely either.
It seems to me the easiest thing to do is write down all
the solutions (which isn't that bad).

-- Andrew


0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from kiwi.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA02394; Sun, 05 May 96 21:42:58 EDT
From: achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Andrew Chou)
Received: by kiwi.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA14382; Sun, 05 May 96 21:43:00 EDT
Date: Sun, 05 May 96 21:43:00 EDT
Message-Id: <199605060143.AA14382@kiwi.lcs.mit.edu>
To: 6042-teachers

Actually, for problem 5, the balls/bins solution divided by 4 gives
you the right answer.  But, the reason is an artifact of the choice of
7 and 4.  It turns out when you write 7 as the sum of 4 nonnegative
integers, there is always a unique number in the sum 
(e.g. 7 = 2+ 2+ 2+ 1 -- the 1 is unique) and the balls/bins solution
will count each one 4 times.

However, if the number of pepperoni's was 8, the balls/bins answer
would be wrong, since it would undercount 8 = 2+2+2+2.  

Even for 6, the balls/bins answer is wrong since 6=2+2+1+1 or 6= 3+3+0+0

I think this problem is bad.  You can get the right answer for the
wrong reason (ie lots of grading complaints).

-- Andrew


0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from stork.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA02970; Sun, 05 May 96 22:48:57 EDT
From: meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Albert R. Meyer)
Received: by stork.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA10192; Sun, 05 May 96 22:50:44 EDT
Date: Sun, 05 May 96 22:50:44 EDT
Message-Id: <199605060250.AA10192@stork.lcs.mit.edu>
To: achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu, 6042-teachers
In-Reply-To: Andrew Chou's message of Sun, 05 May 96 21:43:00 EDT <199605060143.AA14382@kiwi.lcs.mit.edu>
Subject: q3 prob5 and comments

   Actually, for problem 5, the balls/bins solution divided by 4 gives
   you the right answer.  But, the reason is an artifact of the choice of
   7 and 4....

I was about to send email with exactly Andrew's comments on prob 5.  It
might be salvageable if we reformulated it as in
Quiz3/prob5-meyer-salvage, in which case I suggest renumbering salvaged
prob5 as prob1.

I propose to replace prob 4 with meyer-q3-prob.tex.

Don't see yet how to salvage Prob 3.  I'd like to replace it with a
problem combining cards-people-bags counting with expectation of random
variable.

Tell me what you think.

Regards, A. 



0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <rivest@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from swan.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA18841; Mon, 06 May 96 14:47:57 EDT
From: rivest@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Ron Rivest)
Received: by swan.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA07799; Mon, 06 May 96 14:47:56 EDT
Date: Mon, 06 May 96 14:47:56 EDT
Message-Id: <199605061847.AA07799@swan.lcs.mit.edu>
To: 6042-teachers
Subject: Quiz 3


I have made the following changes:
	-- removed problem 3 (on two-point distributions)
	-- added albert's suggested problem (an explicit six-point 
           distribution)
        -- modified problem 4 by eliminating part (b) and adding two
           easier and more interesting parts
        -- refining the pizza problem to make sure the issue of 
           rotational symmetry is explicit, rather than implicit, as
           suggested by albert.

Please look it over, and give me feedback of any sort (length, appropriateness,
quality of problems, etc...)

	Cheers,
	Ron


0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <rivest@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from swan.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA19259; Mon, 06 May 96 15:03:18 EDT
From: rivest@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Ron Rivest)
Received: by swan.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA07861; Mon, 06 May 96 15:03:17 EDT
Date: Mon, 06 May 96 15:03:17 EDT
Message-Id: <199605061903.AA07861@swan.lcs.mit.edu>
To: 6042-teachers
Subject: Warning


I just re-ordered the problems so Albert's ends up all on the same
page...

	Ron


0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from stork.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA21564; Mon, 06 May 96 16:37:15 EDT
From: meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Albert R. Meyer)
Received: by stork.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA10661; Mon, 06 May 96 16:39:03 EDT
Date: Mon, 06 May 96 16:39:03 EDT
Message-Id: <199605062039.AA10661@stork.lcs.mit.edu>
To: 6042-teachers
Subject: shorter q3

Looking at
May  6 15:00 q3.tex

Prob 1: I suggest cutting the P(Y=-1), E(X), Var(X) parts.  The ideas in
these are adequately covered in the remaining parts.

Prob 4: I suggest cutting part (a), since it's (too) easy and not needed
for (b), (c).

Prob 5: Make it the second problem.  (It should be first, but can't
because of prob 1 format.)

Prob 5: part (b) may be a mess to grade--lots of handwaving, sort of
right, case analysis can be expected.  Can we reformulate it to ask for a
proof of some specific fact about partitioning 9 into 4, from which no
rotational symmetry follows.  (I don't know of one such fact which does
the job--I find myself doing a case analysis on how many times the maximum
number of pepperoni's/pizza piece occur.)

Prob 5: In my dialect, we talk of SLICES OF PIZZA and PIECES OF PEPPERONI,
rather than                       PIECES OF PIZZA and SLICES OF PEPPERONI.
How about using only the word "slices" for both?

Prob 5: replace "n = 9" by "nine" throughout.  Replace "values of n," by
"numbers".

Regards, A.



0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from dove.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA25275; Mon, 06 May 96 20:11:06 EDT
Received: from dove.lcs.mit.edu by dove.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA20117; Mon, 06 May 96 20:13:52 EDT
Message-Id: <199605070013.AA20117@dove.lcs.mit.edu>
X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.2 7/18/95
To: "Jeremy H. Lin" <jhlin@MIT.EDU>
Cc: 6042-teachers
Subject: Re: Conflict Exam? 
In-Reply-To: Your message of Sun, 05 May 96 17:31:27 -0400.
             <9605052131.AA17311@MIT.MIT.EDU> 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Mon, 06 May 96 20:13:52 -0400
From: kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu


>         Hi, I still haven't received word on when or where my conflict exam
> is. (I'm the one with jury duty, if you don't remember)  Thanks!
> 

Hi,

Sorry for not being faster with the response. There is no conflict time 
scheduled for this quiz. We also assume the jury duty will take entire day, so 
taking the quiz on some other time on Tuesday would not be possible. 

Therefore, there are two options:

 1) You don't take the quiz and we average your quiz/final grades. This 
effectively gives you a grade on the quiz that is the average of your exam 
grades.

 2) You take a makeup quiz on Wednesday.

Option (1), if you agree, would be the preferred option. Let us know. In any 
case, you should bring us a copy of the letter you received for the jury 
duty---just for the records.

--Jakov Kucan
6.042/18.062 TA



0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <rivest@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from swan.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA27861; Mon, 06 May 96 23:37:49 EDT
From: rivest@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Ron Rivest)
Received: by swan.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA08115; Mon, 06 May 96 23:37:48 EDT
Date: Mon, 06 May 96 23:37:48 EDT
Message-Id: <199605070337.AA08115@swan.lcs.mit.edu>
To: 6042-teachers
Subject: Quiz3 


is ready to be looked over...

	Cheers,
	Ron



0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from swan.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA27898; Mon, 06 May 96 23:40:12 EDT
From: achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Andrew Chou)
Received: by swan.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA08134; Mon, 06 May 96 23:40:11 EDT
Date: Mon, 06 May 96 23:40:11 EDT
Message-Id: <199605070340.AA08134@swan.lcs.mit.edu>
To: 6042-teachers

It looks good.

For problem 4, 
1)  We should mention that the interviews are independent.
2)  What is meant by the std dev?  I suppose you mean
	\sqrt{p(1-p)n}
    However, $p$ is estimated and thus we don't know for certainity the real
    $p$ and cannot  directly apply the
    formula.  Granted, you don't need to actually know $p$ to answer
    part (a), but it can be confusing.  This could also cause
    difficulties for part (b).

Anyways, I think it might be more confusing than intended.


-- Andrew





0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from stork.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA06552; Tue, 07 May 96 09:45:41 EDT
From: meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Albert R. Meyer)
Received: by stork.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA10891; Tue, 07 May 96 09:47:29 EDT
Date: Tue, 07 May 96 09:47:29 EDT
Message-Id: <199605071347.AA10891@stork.lcs.mit.edu>
To: 6042-teachers
In-Reply-To: Andrew Chou's message of Mon, 06 May 96 23:40:11 EDT <199605070340.AA08134@swan.lcs.mit.edu>
Subject: variance in prob 4 4

   From: achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Andrew Chou)
   Date: Mon, 06 May 96 23:40:11 EDT

   It looks good.

   For problem 4, 
   1)  We should mention that the interviews are independent.
   2)  What is meant by the std dev?  I suppose you mean
           \sqrt{p(1-p)n}
       However, $p$ is estimated and thus we don't know for certainity the real
       $p$ and cannot  directly apply the
       formula.  Granted, you don't need to actually know $p$ to answer
       part (a), but it can be confusing.

A repair to meet Andrew's concern:

REPLACE
"with a standard deviation in the measurement of $p$ of 5\%."
 BY
"with a standard deviation in the measurement of $p$ known to be at most 5\%."

AND REPLACE
"to lower this standard deviation to 1\%."
BY
"to lower the bound on standard deviation to at most 1\%.

FYI: since the Clinton vs Dole indicator variable is 0-1 valued, it
variance is at most 1/2, so an upper bound on standard deviation for n
interviews is sqrt(1/2n).


Prob 2:  Move the line
"You may take it as a fact that a rotation....slices." from problem intro
into part (b).


Prob 1:
add "0." in the second array:
     0.  & P((X=0) \wedge (Y=1)) & \mbox{(14)} \\ \hline


Looks good.

Regards, A.


0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <parry@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from woodpecker.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA02493; Tue, 07 May 96 14:37:29 EDT
Received: from woodpecker.lcs.mit.edu by woodpecker.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA16372; Tue, 07 May 96 14:40:28 EDT
Message-Id: <199605071840.AA16372@woodpecker.lcs.mit.edu>
To: 6042-teachers
Subject: tut13
Date: Tue, 07 May 96 14:40:28 -0400
From: parry@theory.lcs.mit.edu

A draft of tutorial 13 is in tut13.tex in the Tutorials subdirectory.

Parry


0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from stork.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA03688; Tue, 07 May 96 15:35:21 EDT
From: meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Albert R. Meyer)
Received: by stork.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA11172; Tue, 07 May 96 15:37:12 EDT
Date: Tue, 07 May 96 15:37:12 EDT
Message-Id: <199605071937.AA11172@stork.lcs.mit.edu>
To: parry@theory.lcs.mit.edu
Cc: 6042-teachers
In-Reply-To: parry@theory.lcs.mit.edu's message of Tue, 07 May 96 14:40:28 -0400 <199605071840.AA16372@woodpecker.lcs.mit.edu>
Subject: tut13

   Date: Tue, 07 May 96 14:40:28 -0400
   From: parry@theory.lcs.mit.edu

   A draft of tutorial 13 is in tut13.tex in the Tutorials subdirectory.

   Parry

I did the problems by mechanical pattern-matching of series terms.  I
presume there is another, more intuitive and high-level, way to reach the
same conclusions.

Regards, A.


0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from stork.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA08587; Tue, 07 May 96 20:31:09 EDT
From: meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Albert R. Meyer)
Received: by stork.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA11510; Tue, 07 May 96 20:33:00 EDT
Date: Tue, 07 May 96 20:33:00 EDT
Message-Id: <199605080033.AA11510@stork.lcs.mit.edu>
To: 6042-tas
Subject: [hartmans@mit.edu: have a partial test]

Who has the rest of Sam's exam?

Regards, A.
-----------------
Date: Tue, 7 May 1996 18:28:03 -0400
From: Sam Hartman <hartmans@mit.edu>
To: meyer@lcs.mit.edu
Subject: have a partial test


	So, just after problem 3, my speech synthesizer decided to
demonstrate that nicad batterys can be problematic.  I don't carry
arecharger for it because the power supply I normally use is not very
portable and is plugged into a mess of cables in my room.  An eight
hour battery *should* have lasted for three hours.

	Anyway, I got the first three problems (included below)
written up on the computer, and one of the TAs worked with me to write
out answers to the remaining three problems.  So, between my TeX
document and the paper in the answerbook, I did complete the test.

	Also note that I wrote final answers for problem 1 in the
answer book, using the computer only to show work.

\documentstyle{article}
\def\prob#1{\rlap{\hskip -0.5 in #1}}
\def\mod{\mathop{\hbox{mod}}}
\parindent 0 pt
\begin{document}
l\prob{1.}
$$\halign{
\hfil #\hfil&\hfil #\hfil&\qquad \hfil $#$\hfil\cr
$j$&$k$&P((x = j)\land (y = k))\cr
1&1&a\cr
0&1&b\cr
-1&1&c\cr
1&-1&d\cr
0&-1&e\cr
-1&-1&f\cr
}$$

$$P(x = 0) = b+e$$

$$P(y = 1)\vert (x \ge 0) = {a+b\over a+b+d+e}$$

$$E(y) = a+b+c-d-e-f$$
$$a+b+c-(1-(a+b+c))$$

$$2a+2b+2c-1$$


$$E(x) = a+d-c-f$$
$$E(x^2) = a+c+d+f$$

$$E(xy) = f+a-c-d$$


\prob{2.}

\hskip 0.5 in A.
$$\hbox{bp}(9,4) = (12)C(3) = {12!\over 3!(9!)} = {12\times 11\times 10\over 6}$$

\hskip 0.5 in B.
\def\bb{\mathop{\rm bb}}
$$\mathop{\hbox{bb}}(9,4)$$
$$\bb(9,3)+\bb(5,4)$$
$$\bb(9,2)+\bb(6,3)+\bb(5,3)+\bb(1,4)$$
$$\bb(9,1)+\bb(7,2)+\bb(6,2)+\bb(3,3)+\bb(5,2)+\bb(2,3)+\bb(1,1)$$
$$1+\bb(7,1)+\bb(5,2)+\bb(6,1)+\bb(4,2)+\bb(3,2)+\bb(5,1)+2\bb(2,3)+1$$
$$1+1+\bb(5,1)+\bb(3,2)+1+\bb(4,1)+\bb(2,2)+\bb(3,1)+\bb(1,2)+1+2\bb(2,1)+1$$
$$1+1+1+\bb(3,1)+\bb(1,2)+1+1+1+1+1+1+2+1$$
$$14$$


\prob{3.}

\hskip 0.5 in A.
$$P(m)\vert T = {P(T)\vert M\times P(m)\over P(T)}$$
$$P(T) = {1\over 1000000}+{999999\over 1000000}q$$
$$P(m)\vert T = {1\over 1000000\left({1\over 1000000}+{999999\over 1000000}q\right)}$$
$$P(m)\vert T = {1\over \left(1+{999999}q\right)}$$
\hskip 0.5 in B.
$${1\over 2} = {1\over \left(1+{999999}q\right)}$$
$$2 = 1+{999999}q$$
$${1\over 999999} < q$$

\prob{4.}

\hskip 0.5 in A.

\end{document}






0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from dove.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA08637; Tue, 07 May 96 20:33:12 EDT
Received: from dove.lcs.mit.edu by dove.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA22081; Tue, 07 May 96 20:36:01 EDT
Message-Id: <199605080036.AA22081@dove.lcs.mit.edu>
X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.2 7/18/95
To: meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Albert R. Meyer)
Cc: 6042-tas
Subject: Re: [hartmans@mit.edu: have a partial test] 
In-Reply-To: Your message of Tue, 07 May 96 20:33:00 -0400.
             <199605080033.AA11510@stork.lcs.mit.edu> 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Tue, 07 May 96 20:36:01 -0400
From: kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu


> Who has the rest of Sam's exam?
> 
> Regards, A.

I do. Didn't you get e-mail form me?

--Jakov




0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <rivest@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from swan.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA01612; Fri, 10 May 96 08:05:26 EDT
From: rivest@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Ron Rivest)
Received: by swan.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA11042; Fri, 10 May 96 08:05:25 EDT
Date: Fri, 10 May 96 08:05:25 EDT
Message-Id: <199605101205.AA11042@swan.lcs.mit.edu>
To: 6042-teachers
Subject: Quiz 3


I finished grading problem 4, and returned the quizes to the quiz box
on Parry's desk.

	Cheers,
	Ron


0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <rivest@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from swan.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA01861; Fri, 10 May 96 08:24:22 EDT
From: rivest@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Ron Rivest)
Received: by swan.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA11045; Fri, 10 May 96 08:24:21 EDT
Date: Fri, 10 May 96 08:24:21 EDT
Message-Id: <199605101224.AA11045@swan.lcs.mit.edu>
To: 6042-teachers
Subject: Recitation today


Here are some thoughts/suggestions:

(1) Review the various formulas and approximation given in the 
    last two lectures.  (Poisson approximation, normal approximation,
    etc.)  The normal distribution may be confusing to them, since it
    is a continuous distribution.  Emphasize its nature and the distinction
    between a density function and a probability distribution function.

(2) Do some exercises applying each of them.  (You might want to bring a
    calculator and/or a set of tables for the normal function.)

	(a) Estimate the likelihood of getting 500 heads out of
            1000 fair coin flips.

	(b) Estimate the chances of getting (for a fair coin):
		60 heads out of 100
		240 heads out of 400
		6000 heads out of 10000
		(all 60%)

	(c) Estimate the probability of getting more than 600 heads
            out of 900 tosses of a fair coin using
		- bound on tail of normal distribution
                - geometric series bound on tail of binomial

	(d) A group of n people take off their shoes and place them in
            a big pile.  Someone then randomly gives each participant
            two shoes from the pile.  (Not necessarily a right and a left,
            and not necessarily from the same pair.)
		-- What are the chances that no-one gets a matched pair?
		-- What are the chances that no-one gets either of their
                   own shoes back?
                -- What are the chances that someone gets both of their
                   own shoes back?

Cheers --

	Ron

	


0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from dove.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA21976; Mon, 13 May 96 11:48:39 EDT
Received: from dove.lcs.mit.edu by dove.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA28468; Mon, 13 May 96 11:51:30 EDT
Message-Id: <199605131551.AA28468@dove.lcs.mit.edu>
X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.2 7/18/95
To: 6042-teachers
Subject: quiz 3 solutions
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Mon, 13 May 96 11:51:29 -0400
From: kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu


I wrote a solution w/ comments to problem 6. It is in Qiuz3/Hxx-Q3Sols.tex.

--Jakov




0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from stork.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA23479; Mon, 13 May 96 12:53:19 EDT
From: meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Albert R. Meyer)
Received: by stork.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA13343; Mon, 13 May 96 12:55:13 EDT
Date: Mon, 13 May 96 12:55:13 EDT
Message-Id: <199605131655.AA13343@stork.lcs.mit.edu>
To: 6042-tas
Subject: staff meeting Tueday at 11:30

I have to postpone tomorrow's 6042 staff meeting until 11:30.  Agenda will
be final tutorial problems, quick check of quiz 3 sol'ns, and preliminary
plans for the final.  If you have time, look over previous the finals for
good problems to rework.  If we're prepared, we might still finish by noon.

Regards, A.


0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from dove.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA25114; Mon, 13 May 96 14:15:29 EDT
Received: from dove.lcs.mit.edu by dove.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA28891; Mon, 13 May 96 14:18:20 EDT
Message-Id: <199605131818.AA28891@dove.lcs.mit.edu>
X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.2 7/18/95
To: 6042-teachers
Subject: Q3
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Mon, 13 May 96 14:18:16 -0400
From: kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu



is graded and the grades are recorded.

The stats are: avg=70.3, median=73.5, std.dev=18.0

--Jakov



0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from stork.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA02742; Mon, 13 May 96 21:32:48 EDT
From: meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Albert R. Meyer)
Received: by stork.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA13587; Mon, 13 May 96 21:34:42 EDT
Date: Mon, 13 May 96 21:34:42 EDT
Message-Id: <199605140134.AA13587@stork.lcs.mit.edu>
To: 6042-tas
Subject: q3-soln

I've entered soln to prob 11 and slightly shortened the soln to Prob 6 in
Hxx-Q3Sols-meyer.tex.  We still need soln's for probs 4 & 5.

Regards, A.


0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <miccianc@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from kingfisher.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA15815; Tue, 14 May 96 13:24:36 EDT
From: miccianc@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Daniele Micciancio)
Received: by kingfisher.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA14373; Tue, 14 May 96 13:31:22 EDT
Date: Tue, 14 May 96 13:31:22 EDT
Message-Id: <199605141731.AA14373@kingfisher.lcs.mit.edu>
To: 6042-teachers
Subject: tut14.tex


tut14.tex is in the Tutorial directory.

Daniele


0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from stork.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA04186; Wed, 15 May 96 10:17:43 EDT
From: meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Albert R. Meyer)
Received: by stork.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA13968; Wed, 15 May 96 10:19:39 EDT
Date: Wed, 15 May 96 10:19:39 EDT
Message-Id: <199605151419.AA13968@stork.lcs.mit.edu>
To: miccianc@theory.lcs.mit.edu
In-Reply-To: Daniele Micciancio's message of Tue, 14 May 96 13:31:22 EDT <199605141731.AA14373@kingfisher.lcs.mit.edu>
Subject: tut14.tex
Cc: 6042-tas

   From: miccianc@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Daniele Micciancio)
   Date: Tue, 14 May 96 13:31:22 EDT


   tut14.tex is in the Tutorial directory.

   Daniele

I edited the text a bit (without changing the problems).  OK to use
Daniele's version if you've made copies already.

Regards, A.


0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from dove.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA14598; Wed, 15 May 96 19:02:33 EDT
Received: from dove.lcs.mit.edu by dove.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA03183; Wed, 15 May 96 19:05:26 EDT
Message-Id: <199605152305.AA03183@dove.lcs.mit.edu>
X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.2 7/18/95
To: 6042-teachers
Subject: Q3 solutions
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Wed, 15 May 96 19:05:25 -0400
From: kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu


I posted the Q3 solutions on the web. I fixed a couple of typos I found.

--Jakov



0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from stork.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA17015; Wed, 15 May 96 22:24:28 EDT
From: meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Albert R. Meyer)
Received: by stork.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA14375; Wed, 15 May 96 22:26:25 EDT
Date: Wed, 15 May 96 22:26:25 EDT
Message-Id: <199605160226.AA14375@stork.lcs.mit.edu>
To: 6042-teachers
Subject: [lcshih@MIT.EDU: First draft of UG6 review]

FYI and comments/corrections:

To: rivest@theory.lcs.mit.edu, meyer@lcs.mit.edu
Subject: First draft of UG6 review
Date: Wed, 15 May 1996 19:02:25 EDT
From: Loren Shih <lcshih@MIT.EDU>

Dear Professor,

	In order to improve the accuracy and usefulness of the
Underground Guide to Course 6, our staff is continuing the practice of
emailing instructors a draft of their class review for factual
verification.

	I am enclosing a preliminary draft of your review below.  It
is in Latex format and will contain control characters or comments
that you should ignore.  I apologize that, due to a shortage of staff
this term, some reviews have not yet been edited once and may appear
as a very rough draft.

	I hope that you will have time to note any factual errors, as
it is difficult for us to catch small mistakes such as incorrect
spelling of faculty names, misreporting of number of exams, and other
related errors.  Also, if you did not complete a faculty evaluation
form or would like to append additional comments, you are welcome to
include those now.  It is not critical to report grammatical errors
since the reviews will be edited by at least two more parties before
they are published.

	Please email any comments you have to me (lcshih@mit.edu) and
I will include them in the review.  I would to receive feedback very
soon, preferably before Friday if possible.  Thank you very much for
your time!

	Loren Shih

	Editor, Course 6 Underground Guide


---------------------------------------------------------------------------


%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% GET READY TO WRITE A GREAT REVIEW! %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

% Subject information according to professor - Take verbatim from faculty
% eval form: Mention what the professor feels the subject covers and
% what the emphasis is on.  If you don't have the eval form, say so.

6.042J is a required course for 6-3 students. It is a first exposure to
many important concepts and techniques that will be useful in later 
courses and throughout computer science. Two important concepts of 6.042J
are proots and sample spaces, but in general, it covers discrete mathematics
and probability.

Grading is based on: 9 problem sets (35\%), 3 quizzes (30\%), participation
(15\%), and the final (20\%).

%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
% Subject information according to students: Mention what the students feel
% the subject covers - you don't need to repeat verbatim what the professor
% said, but tell anything that was different in the student's response.
% Mention who takes the subject, what do you learn in the subject, what is the
% balance between application and theory, what should have been taught
% but wasn't. Also indicate what parts of the subject were the most helpful
% in learning the material.

6.042J is taken mainly by freshmen and sophomores in 6-2 and 6-3, although
a few juniors were in the class. In general, students felt that the course
contains too much theory and not enough applications and examples. A few
students even said that they did not know how this relates to computer
science at all. Lectures received mixed reviews, but most students felt
that the recitations and tutorials were very useful for learning the
material. 

%%%%%%%%%%%% OK.  GOOD START.  KEEP GOING. %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
% Motivation to take the subject: Your reader will most certainly want to
% know why they should take the subject - give them reasons! -- tell them why
% most people take the subject and  what are the strong and weak points.

Most students taking the class cited 6-3 requirement as the main reason
for taking it. (One student suggested switching to 6-2 to avoid the class.)
6.042J gives a good overview of discrete mathematics and probability,
but some felt that it was too detailed for an overview class, but too
general to be a detailed class. 6.042J is also good for practicing proofs.

%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
% Comment on the lecturer's teaching.  Be absolutely sure to mention how
% the lecturer should improve.  Remember that one of the main goals of
% the guide is to have everyone improve their teaching skills.  Quote
% students.
  
There were two lecturers for 6.042J. Professor R. Rivest was praised for
being organized and having good blackboard technique. He explains well,
but at times went over tough materials rather quickly. Some commented
that he is a little dry and bland. Professor A. Meyer was praised for
being much more animated than Rivest. However, many students complained
that he is confusing, prone to mistakes, and has illegible handwriting.
Many students would have liked lecture notes on a regular basis in
case they had to miss lectures.

%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
% Critique the recitation instructor's teaching. Be sure to mention the
% good AND the bad for recitation instructors.  Many people would like
% to choose which recitation based on what you write - print relevant
% stuff.  If there is no recitation, say so.

Both recitations and tutorials are required for 6.042J and are taught
by the teaching assistants. In general, students would
have liked to see harder examples in recitation, since the problem
sets were much harder than the material presented. Furthermore, many
students commented that they wish lectures were more like the
recitations. Tutorials, on the other hand, received mixed responses.
Some students said that tutorials were helpful for proof-writing
practice. Other students felt that the tutorials were too big in size and
mostly dominated by a few students who knew what they were doing. 

%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% 
% TAs Mention a little about each TA.  Because TAs are much less likely
% to teach again and are much less willing to be criticized, have {\em
% several} pieces of evidence - TAs will most certainly look at the
% forms if you print negative comments.  Don't hesitate to do so, just
% be careful.

TA P. Husbands was praised
for being humorous and for making recitations interesting. He explains
well and encourages questions. TA J. Kucan was also considered excellent
by most of his students. He is friendly, but has been said to go into
deep discussions once in a while that left some students behind. TA A.
Chou knows the material well and was very friendly. Some students
reported leaving his tutorials with a clear understanding of previously
obscured material. TA D. Micciancio was hard to follow at times but 
otherwise good and knowledgeable.

%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
% Work (problem sets, labs).  Offer *any* constructive 
% criticism mentioned, especially since no one will take it personally.
% Problem sets... mention how grungy, challenging, frustrating they are, 
% along with an estimate of how long they take. Indicate if students liked
% working in groups or if they found bibles helpful.

6.042J problem sets were considered quite tough. Working in groups is
encouraged. Some students found them essential to gaining insights
on homework problems. Course bibles are allowed and also provided
another source of practice and insight. Most students rated the problem
sets as 50\% challenging, 20\% grunge, and 30\% utter frustration.

%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
% Texts, notes, and reference material.  Include remarks from
% students, TA's and faculty.  Include titles.  mention value to the
% learning process,  strong points, what they lack and what needs to
% be improved.

6.042J has one required text by Rosen. The textbook was considered pretty
good. It has good explanations, but most of the problems in the book
were too simple compared to the problem sets and the class overall. 
Furthermore, it was not as comprehensive as students would have liked
(not much probability).

The quizzes were considered appropriate for the course. However, students
would have liked to see fewer quizzes. Some pointed out that, to do well
on quizzes, one must be able to come up with the appropriate insight
quickly; maybe hints should be given for those problems.

%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
% Whatever advice or suggestions people have, write them down.  When in doubt
% write down ``(1 person)'' next to something - the editors will edit it
% out if you are unsure of it. 

Students suggested taking this class with other people so collaboration
is easier. Having taken tests like AHSME in high school would have
helped too.

%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
% Fill in the index information - for every lecturer, recitation
% instructor and TA, follow the style: \index{Last F.} 

\index{Rivest R.}
\index{Meyer A.}
\index{Husbands P.}
\index{Chou A.}
\index{Kucan J.}
\index{Micciancio D.}

\end{multicols}
\begin{quips}

%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
% Quips.  Put something that makes you crack up.  Lighten up the guide
% with this. 
% If someone is praised unusally highly or lowly, you should put an excellent
% analogy in here.  Do NOT put in things like: ``Alyssa P. Hacker is a babe!''
% or ``Bitdiddle has funny hair.''

`` ``

\end{quips}
\end{evaluation}

\end{document}

%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%  YOU FINISHED!!!  YAY!!! %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%









0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from kiwi.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA16686; Fri, 17 May 96 10:34:45 EDT
From: achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Andrew Chou)
Received: by kiwi.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA20014; Fri, 17 May 96 10:34:50 EDT
Date: Fri, 17 May 96 10:34:50 EDT
Message-Id: <199605171434.AA20014@kiwi.lcs.mit.edu>
To: 6042-forum
Subject: Final Announcement

The final exam for 6.042 is scheduled for

	FRIDAY	May 24
	9-12 am 
	DuPont

It will be open book and open notes.  No electronic gadgets.  The
final is comprehensive and will test material from all parts of the
course.  We have provided a handout containing review problems (from
previous finals) on the web site.  The TA's will have office hours during
Finals Week as follows:

	Jakov	T 12-2	NE43-334
	Parry   W 3-5	NE43-334
	Andrew  W 5-7	NE43-311
	Daniele R 3-5	NE43-368




0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from kiwi.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA19012; Fri, 17 May 96 12:30:33 EDT
From: achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Andrew Chou)
Received: by kiwi.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA20100; Fri, 17 May 96 12:30:39 EDT
Date: Fri, 17 May 96 12:30:39 EDT
Message-Id: <199605171630.AA20100@kiwi.lcs.mit.edu>
To: 6042-teachers

Hi,

We plan to have staff meeting Mon at 11am to work on the final.
As usual, suggested problems are the Final directory.

-- Andrew


0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from stork.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA22602; Fri, 17 May 96 15:40:13 EDT
From: meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Albert R. Meyer)
Received: by stork.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA14812; Fri, 17 May 96 15:42:11 EDT
Date: Fri, 17 May 96 15:42:11 EDT
Message-Id: <199605171942.AA14812@stork.lcs.mit.edu>
To: achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu
In-Reply-To: Andrew Chou's message of Fri, 17 May 96 12:30:39 EDT <199605171630.AA20100@kiwi.lcs.mit.edu>
Subject: monday 11:30 
Cc: 6042-teachers

   From: achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Andrew Chou)
   Date: Fri, 17 May 96 12:30:39 EDT

   Hi,

   We plan to have staff meeting Mon at 11am to work on the final.
   As usual, suggested problems are the Final directory.

   -- Andrew

Make it 11:30---I'm running a seminar 10--12, but will end it at 11:30.

Regards, A.


0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from kiwi.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA26973; Fri, 17 May 96 21:33:59 EDT
From: achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Andrew Chou)
Received: by kiwi.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA20285; Fri, 17 May 96 21:34:05 EDT
Date: Fri, 17 May 96 21:34:05 EDT
Message-Id: <199605180134.AA20285@kiwi.lcs.mit.edu>
To: 6042-tas
Subject: [efe@MIT.EDU: Final conflict!]

Does anyone want to give him a final on Wed afternoon?  I won't be
around.  This guy is an idiot for not resolving this earlier.  So,
we give him all the questions we thought are too hard.

-- Andrew

Return-Path: <efe@MIT.EDU>
From: efe@MIT.EDU
To: achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu
Subject: Final conflict!
Date: Fri, 17 May 1996 18:18:41 EDT



Andrew,

Hello!  This is Efe here and I hope everything is pretty cool
with you.  I could not resolve my situation about the final.  I
have a conflict for both wednesday and friday mornings.  I'd
like to take the 6.042 exam on wednesday afternoon.  I will be
taking 6.004 wednesday morning so I won't be able to contact
anybody who is taking 6.042 that morning.  Please get back to 
me about this ASAP.  Thanks a lot for your time and 
consideration.

Best,

Efe E. Cakarel







0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <rivest@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from swan.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA01541; Mon, 20 May 96 09:53:54 EDT
From: rivest@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Ron Rivest)
Received: by swan.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA00261; Mon, 20 May 96 09:53:54 EDT
Date: Mon, 20 May 96 09:53:54 EDT
Message-Id: <199605201353.AA00261@swan.lcs.mit.edu>
To: 6042-teachers
Subject: Today's meeting // Final


I have to be at BBN at 10:30.  I'll probably be back by 11:30...

	See you then...

	Cheers,
	Ron


0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <miccianc@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from kingfisher.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA12149; Mon, 20 May 96 18:20:41 EDT
From: miccianc@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Daniele Micciancio)
Received: by kingfisher.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA01306; Mon, 20 May 96 18:27:35 EDT
Date: Mon, 20 May 96 18:27:35 EDT
Message-Id: <199605202227.AA01306@kingfisher.lcs.mit.edu>
To: 6042-teachers
Subject: final problems


I rewrote the problems in dan.tex.

Daniele




0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from stork.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA12232; Mon, 20 May 96 18:27:35 EDT
From: meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Albert R. Meyer)
Received: by stork.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA15849; Mon, 20 May 96 18:29:36 EDT
Date: Mon, 20 May 96 18:29:36 EDT
Message-Id: <199605202229.AA15849@stork.lcs.mit.edu>
To: 6042-forum
Subject: H52-chernoff-notes

Handout 52, Notes on Chernoff's Bounds, is available on the course WWW
page.

Yours truly,
Prof. Albert R. Meyer
MIT Lab. for Computer Science


0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <parry@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from woodpecker.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA20786; Tue, 21 May 96 05:32:03 EDT
Received: from woodpecker.lcs.mit.edu by woodpecker.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA25935; Tue, 21 May 96 05:35:08 EDT
Message-Id: <199605210935.AA25935@woodpecker.lcs.mit.edu>
To: 6042-teachers
Subject: Final Problems
Date: Tue, 21 May 96 05:35:08 -0400
From: parry@theory.lcs.mit.edu

I edited my file to reflect what we discussed at the meeting.  I also added
another simple problem.  I probably won't be in 'till the afternoon.

Parry



0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from stork.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA21157; Tue, 21 May 96 06:30:48 EDT
From: meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Albert R. Meyer)
Received: by stork.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA16267; Tue, 21 May 96 06:32:48 EDT
Date: Tue, 21 May 96 06:32:48 EDT
Message-Id: <199605211032.AA16267@stork.lcs.mit.edu>
To: 6042-teachers
Subject: notes, the final, meeting

I've added a problem on justifying a probability proof in
Final/meyer-proof-problem.tex.

I've also finished the notes on Gambler's Ruin and put them on the Web
page.  I suggest we send a forum message announcing their presence, but
indicating that there will be NO final exam question about Ruin.

Finally, I regret I can't make it to staff meeting this morning after all.
I'll check in with Ron by phone in early afternoon, and be available
online at home by 5pm.

Regards, A.


0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from stork.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA23100; Tue, 21 May 96 09:58:41 EDT
From: meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Albert R. Meyer)
Received: by stork.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA16377; Tue, 21 May 96 10:00:42 EDT
Date: Tue, 21 May 96 10:00:42 EDT
Message-Id: <199605211400.AA16377@stork.lcs.mit.edu>
To: 6042-teachers
Subject: final.tex prob 8(c)

(the transcendental number problem) "rationals" ---> "integers"

Regards, A.


0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <ndf@aleph1.mit.edu>
Received: from ALEPH1.MIT.EDU by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA29929; Tue, 21 May 96 15:23:54 EDT
Received: (from ndf@localhost) by aleph1.mit.edu (8.6.12/8.6.12) id PAA17895; Tue, 21 May 1996 15:22:38 -0400
Date: Tue, 21 May 1996 15:22:38 -0400
Message-Id: <199605211922.PAA17895@aleph1.mit.edu>
From: Nat Friedman <ndf@aleph1.mit.edu>
To: 6042-teachers@theory.lcs.mit.edu
Cc: ndf@ALEPH1.MIT.EDU
Subject: my quiz #1 grade...


I thought I'd mail 6042-teachers about my two quiz #1 grade changes just in
case your quiz grade semaphore system isn't perfect.  My original grade
on the quiz was a 67.  Andrew awarded my 7 extra points on problem 7,
bringing my grade to a 74.  Then, Albert gave me two more points on
problem 4, so my quiz #1 grade should be a 76.

Boy, sorry to seem like such a grub - I just didn't want the score to
be reverted to 67+2 accidentally...

Cheers,
-Nat


0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from dove.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA02412; Tue, 21 May 96 17:51:13 EDT
Received: from dove.lcs.mit.edu by dove.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA14575; Tue, 21 May 96 17:54:09 EDT
Message-Id: <199605212154.AA14575@dove.lcs.mit.edu>
X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.2 7/18/95
To: meyer
Cc: 6042-teachers
Subject: 6042 conflict final...
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Tue, 21 May 96 17:54:09 -0400
From: kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu


...is ready in the course directory. Can you take a last look at it?

--Jakov



0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from stork.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA03286; Tue, 21 May 96 18:48:33 EDT
From: meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Albert R. Meyer)
Received: by stork.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA16621; Tue, 21 May 96 18:50:35 EDT
Date: Tue, 21 May 96 18:50:35 EDT
Message-Id: <199605212250.AA16621@stork.lcs.mit.edu>
To: kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu
Cc: 6042-teachers
In-Reply-To: kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu's message of Tue, 21 May 96 17:54:09 -0400 <199605212154.AA14575@dove.lcs.mit.edu>
Subject: 6042 conflict final...

   X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.2 7/18/95
   Date: Tue, 21 May 96 17:54:09 -0400
   From: kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu


   ...is ready in the course directory. Can you take a last look at it?

   --Jakov

I took a quick look.  There was no problem which looked bad, but there are
too many proofs.

Regards, A.


0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from dove.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA03439; Tue, 21 May 96 19:01:40 EDT
Received: from dove.lcs.mit.edu by dove.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA14766; Tue, 21 May 96 19:04:32 EDT
Message-Id: <199605212304.AA14766@dove.lcs.mit.edu>
X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.2 7/18/95
To: meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Albert R. Meyer)
Cc: 6042-teachers
Subject: Re: 6042 conflict final... 
In-Reply-To: Your message of Tue, 21 May 96 18:50:35 -0400.
             <199605212250.AA16621@stork.lcs.mit.edu> 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Tue, 21 May 96 19:04:32 -0400
From: kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu


>    X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.2 7/18/95
>    Date: Tue, 21 May 96 17:54:09 -0400
>    From: kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu
> 
> 
>    ...is ready in the course directory. Can you take a last look at it?
> 
>    --Jakov
> 
> I took a quick look.  There was no problem which looked bad, but there are
> too many proofs.
> 
> Regards, A.

I think the exam is about the same lenght and difficulty as the regular final, 
but I wouldn't object if we dropped (or replaced) one of the "proof" questions.

--Jakov



0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from stork.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA03554; Tue, 21 May 96 19:10:02 EDT
From: meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Albert R. Meyer)
Received: by stork.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA16652; Tue, 21 May 96 19:12:04 EDT
Date: Tue, 21 May 96 19:12:04 EDT
Message-Id: <199605212312.AA16652@stork.lcs.mit.edu>
To: kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu
Cc: 6042-teachers
In-Reply-To: kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu's message of Tue, 21 May 96 19:04:32 -0400 <199605212304.AA14766@dove.lcs.mit.edu>
Subject: 6042 conflict final... 

The grade chart on the first page of the conflict final is convenient.
Are we planning to have the regular final done on our own printed
booklets?  If so, use the chart on it too.

Regards, A.


0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <ilyag@MIT.EDU>
Received: from MIT.EDU (PACIFIC-CARRIER-ANNEX.MIT.EDU) by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA15242; Wed, 22 May 96 11:42:45 EDT
Received: from PO9.MIT.EDU by MIT.EDU with SMTP
	id AA14836; Wed, 22 May 96 11:41:19 EDT
Received: from TREMORS.MIT.EDU by po9.MIT.EDU (5.61/4.7) id AA23961; Wed, 22 May 96 11:41:12 EDT
Message-Id: <2.2.32.19960522154239.0069e2f4@po9.mit.edu>
X-Sender: ilyag@po9.mit.edu
X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Pro Version 2.2 (32)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date: Wed, 22 May 1996 11:42:39 -0400
To: 6042-tas@theory.lcs.mit.edu
From: Ilya Gildenblat <ilyag@MIT.EDU>
Subject: Final

        Is there some place where we could get the answers to the final
review problems?  Or to the past final maybe? Anwsers would be very helpful
for studying for the exam.

Thanks,
Ilya




0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from dove.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA15659; Wed, 22 May 96 12:06:05 EDT
Received: from dove.lcs.mit.edu by dove.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA15573; Wed, 22 May 96 12:09:01 EDT
Message-Id: <199605221609.AA15573@dove.lcs.mit.edu>
X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.2 7/18/95
To: Ilya Gildenblat <ilyag@MIT.EDU>
Cc: 6042-tas@theory.lcs.mit.edu
Subject: Re: Final 
In-Reply-To: Your message of Wed, 22 May 96 11:42:39 -0400.
             <2.2.32.19960522154239.0069e2f4@po9.mit.edu> 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Wed, 22 May 96 12:09:01 -0400
From: kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu

>         Is there some place where we could get the answers to the final
> review problems?  Or to the past final maybe? Anwsers would be very helpful
> for studying for the exam.
> 
> Thanks,
> Ilya
> 
> 

We don't have the answers written up, but you can come to any of the office 
hrs today or tomorrow. See the web page for the schedule.

--Jakov



0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from swan.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA16022; Wed, 22 May 96 12:25:13 EDT
From: achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Andrew Chou)
Received: by swan.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA02571; Wed, 22 May 96 12:25:12 EDT
Date: Wed, 22 May 96 12:25:12 EDT
Message-Id: <199605221625.AA02571@swan.lcs.mit.edu>
To: meyer, rivest
Cc: 6042-tas
Subject: Final grades meeting


Are we still on for the grades meeting on Sat?  If so, what time?

-- Andrew


0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from stork.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA20061; Wed, 22 May 96 16:20:40 EDT
From: meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Albert R. Meyer)
Received: by stork.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA17099; Wed, 22 May 96 16:22:43 EDT
Date: Wed, 22 May 96 16:22:43 EDT
Message-Id: <199605222022.AA17099@stork.lcs.mit.edu>
To: achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu
Cc: rivest, 6042-tas
In-Reply-To: Andrew Chou's message of Wed, 22 May 96 12:25:12 EDT <199605221625.AA02571@swan.lcs.mit.edu>
Subject: Final grades meeting

   From: achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Andrew Chou)
   Date: Wed, 22 May 96 12:25:12 EDT


   Are we still on for the grades meeting on Sat?  If so, what time?

   -- Andrew

I'm coming back early, so I'll be available starting 10am Sat to help
grade.  We should have grade assignments meeting at whatever time we're
confident of being finished with final exam grading and data entry.  Can
we make it by 1pm Saturday?

Regards, A.


0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from dove.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA20679; Wed, 22 May 96 16:59:30 EDT
Received: from dove.lcs.mit.edu by dove.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA16300; Wed, 22 May 96 17:02:26 EDT
Message-Id: <199605222102.AA16300@dove.lcs.mit.edu>
X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.2 7/18/95
To: 6042-teachers
Subject: final
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Wed, 22 May 96 17:02:26 -0400
From: kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu


final draft of the final is ready.

--Jakov




0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from stork.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA23444; Wed, 22 May 96 20:50:46 EDT
From: meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Albert R. Meyer)
Received: by stork.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA17298; Wed, 22 May 96 20:52:48 EDT
Date: Wed, 22 May 96 20:52:48 EDT
Message-Id: <199605230052.AA17298@stork.lcs.mit.edu>
To: 6042-forum
Subject: no question about Gambler's Ruin

Handout 53, notes for the final lecture of the course---on the topic of
Gambler's Ruin---is available on the course WWW page.  However, you will
NOT be responsible for this material: there will be NO GAMBLER'S RUIN
QUESTION ON THE FINAL.

Yours truly,
Prof. Albert R. Meyer
MIT Lab. for Computer Science


0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from stork.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA23863; Wed, 22 May 96 21:25:58 EDT
From: meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Albert R. Meyer)
Received: by stork.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA17327; Wed, 22 May 96 21:28:00 EDT
Date: Wed, 22 May 96 21:28:00 EDT
Message-Id: <199605230128.AA17327@stork.lcs.mit.edu>
To: kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu
Cc: 6042-teachers
In-Reply-To: kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu's message of Wed, 22 May 96 17:02:26 -0400 <199605222102.AA16300@dove.lcs.mit.edu>
Subject: final

   X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.2 7/18/95
   Date: Wed, 22 May 96 17:02:26 -0400
   From: kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu


   final draft of the final is ready.

   --Jakov

Looks really nice.  I made one change: \underline{independent} ---> {\em
independent}.

(Jakov, FYI, underlined text is the copy-editor's notation for italics.)

Regards, A.


0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from stork.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA04485; Thu, 23 May 96 11:40:08 EDT
From: meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Albert R. Meyer)
Received: by stork.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA17618; Thu, 23 May 96 11:42:11 EDT
Date: Thu, 23 May 96 11:42:11 EDT
Message-Id: <199605231542.AA17618@stork.lcs.mit.edu>
To: 6042-tas
Subject: [markloh@MIT.EDU: student in 6.042]

From: markloh@MIT.EDU
To: meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu
Subject: student in 6.042
Date: Thu, 23 May 1996 10:30:03 EDT

Dear Prof. Meyer,

I'm the Head TA for 6.004, and I'm hoping you can tell me whether or not
Efe Cakarel took a 6.042 conflict final Wednesday morning.  The 6.004 final
was also Wednesday morning, so Efe is taking his 6.004 final this (thursday)
morning.  We just wanted to double check to make sure he had an actual
conflict with the 6.004 final.

Thanks,
Mark Lohmeyer



0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from dove.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA04536; Thu, 23 May 96 11:42:35 EDT
Received: from dove.lcs.mit.edu by dove.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA17063; Thu, 23 May 96 11:45:32 EDT
Message-Id: <199605231545.AA17063@dove.lcs.mit.edu>
X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.2 7/18/95
To: meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Albert R. Meyer)
Cc: 6042-tas
Subject: Re: [markloh@MIT.EDU: student in 6.042] 
In-Reply-To: Your message of Thu, 23 May 96 11:42:11 -0400.
             <199605231542.AA17618@stork.lcs.mit.edu> 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Thu, 23 May 96 11:45:31 -0400
From: kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu

> From: markloh@MIT.EDU
> To: meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu
> Subject: student in 6.042
> Date: Thu, 23 May 1996 10:30:03 EDT
> 
> Dear Prof. Meyer,
> 
> I'm the Head TA for 6.004, and I'm hoping you can tell me whether or not
> Efe Cakarel took a 6.042 conflict final Wednesday morning.  The 6.004 final
> was also Wednesday morning, so Efe is taking his 6.004 final this (thursday)
> morning.  We just wanted to double check to make sure he had an actual
> conflict with the 6.004 final.
> 
> Thanks,
> Mark Lohmeyer
> 

He did take the conflict final Wednesday morning.

--Jakov



0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <derekt@mit.edu>
Received: from LE-MIEN.MIT.EDU by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA13695; Thu, 23 May 96 22:05:11 EDT
Received: (from derekt@localhost) by le-mien.MIT.EDU (8.6.12/8.6.11) id WAA18798; Thu, 23 May 1996 22:05:12 -0400
From: Derek W Truesdale <derekt@mit.edu>
Message-Id: <199605240205.WAA18798@le-mien.MIT.EDU>
To: 6042-tas@theory.lcs.mit.edu
Subject: "best upper bound"
Date: Thu, 23 May 1996 22:05:11 EDT

when the phrase "best upper bound" is used, what does that mean.
i.e., on the review problems, in prob. 12, 
you can find the maximum number of students, s, who could score > 120
while still having a variance of 72 and an average of 60, by some ugly
formula:
s(120) + (100-s)v = 60
s(120-60)^2 + (100-s)(v-60)^2 = 72
this is THE upper bound, and therefore the best (?).  or should I find
another number which is not THE upper bound, but a good one, based on
what is likely, not what is possible?

and for problem 13, once again, it asks what is the best upper bound
on the prob. that a students scores 272 points.
does this mean: "assume the distribution is either Poisson or
Gaussian, and use the better of those two to give an answer"?
because, once again, THE probability could be found, and therefore,
I'd imagine that the best upper bound would be that probability.

thanks for your help,
Derek.



0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from swan.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA14033; Thu, 23 May 96 22:35:38 EDT
From: achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Andrew Chou)
Received: by swan.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA03606; Thu, 23 May 96 22:35:38 EDT
Date: Thu, 23 May 96 22:35:38 EDT
Message-Id: <199605240235.AA03606@swan.lcs.mit.edu>
To: derekt@mit.edu
Cc: 6042-tas
In-Reply-To: Derek W Truesdale's message of Thu, 23 May 1996 22:05:11 EDT <199605240205.WAA18798@le-mien.MIT.EDU>
Subject: "best upper bound"


Prob 12 implies a chebyshev bound.  Given only the variance and the
mean, the chebyshev bound is tight (i.e. there exists a distribution
where the chebyshev upper bound is the actual bound).  If you apply
chebyshev, you should get an answer like 1/100 (I think that's the
answer, but I may be wrong).

Prob 13 indicates a chernoff bound.  Although that's not the exact
bound (which you can calculate), it gives a very good appox.

Hope this clarifies things.

-- Andrew





0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from stork.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA01085; Fri, 24 May 96 23:33:33 EDT
From: meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Albert R. Meyer)
Received: by stork.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA18135; Fri, 24 May 96 23:35:38 EDT
Date: Fri, 24 May 96 23:35:38 EDT
Message-Id: <199605250335.AA18135@stork.lcs.mit.edu>
To: 6042-tas
Subject: [hartmans@mit.edu: last four problems off final]

Date: Fri, 24 May 1996 12:01:57 -0400
From: Sam Hartman <hartmans@mit.edu>
To: meyer@lcs.mit.edu
Subject: last four problems off final


	The first problems were filled out on an answer sheet; here
are the ones I wrote up on the computer.

\documentstyle{article}
\def\prob#1{\rlap{\hskip -0.5 in #1}}
\def\mod{\mathop{\hbox{mod}}}
\parindent 0 pt
\begin{document}
\prob{9.}

\hskip 0.5 in A.
$${{100!\over 93!}\over {n!\over n-71}}$$
$${{100!(n-7)!\over 93! n!}}$$


\hskip 0.5 in B.
$$\left(100\over n\right)^7$$

\hskip 0.5 in C.

\prob{10.}
$$\hbox{bp}(13,4) = 16C3$$
$${16!\over 13!\times 3!}$$


\hskip 0.5 in B.
$$\hbox{bp1}(13,4) = 12C3 = {12!\over 9!\times 3!}$$

\hskip 0.5 in C.
$$\hbox{bb}(13,4)$$

\prob{11.}

\hskip 0.5 in A.
$$E(x) = E(ad)-E(bc)$$
$$E(x) = E(a)E(d)-E(b)E(c)$$
$$ E(x) = 0 $$

\hskip 0.5 in B.
Given that $b= 1$ compute $E(x)$

$$E(x) = 4-2 = 2$$


\hskip 0.5 in C.
$$(ad-bc)^2 = a^2d^2-2abcd+b^2c^2$$
$$a^2d^2-2abcd+b^2c^2$$
$$(1/5)+(4/5)+(9/5)+(16/5)$$
$$E(a^2) = 6$$

$$36-2\times 16+36 = 40$$
$$\hbox{variance } = 40$$


\prob{12.}
	First, let's count the combinations containing ``bag'' or
``def''.  The three letter combination can be started in any of the
first five positions.   Thus, there are $2\times 5\times 4!$ combinations containing one of the forbidden combinations.  Unfortunately, this double counts the six combinations containing both ``bag'' and ``def''.   
$$7!-2\times 5\times 4!+6$$

\end{document}






0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from swan.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA01266; Sat, 25 May 96 00:14:37 EDT
From: achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Andrew Chou)
Received: by swan.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA04094; Sat, 25 May 96 00:14:36 EDT
Date: Sat, 25 May 96 00:14:36 EDT
Message-Id: <199605250414.AA04094@swan.lcs.mit.edu>
To: 6042-teachers
Subject: Grades meeting

All the finals (including Sam's) have been graded and entered
in the spreadsheet.  So, I guess the only thing left is he
grades meeting, which we had planned for Sat at 1pm.  Ok?
-- Andrew


0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from stork.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA06156; Sat, 25 May 96 08:29:22 EDT
From: meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Albert R. Meyer)
Received: by stork.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA18209; Sat, 25 May 96 08:31:19 EDT
Date: Sat, 25 May 96 08:31:19 EDT
Message-Id: <199605251231.AA18209@stork.lcs.mit.edu>
To: achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu
Cc: 6042-teachers
In-Reply-To: Andrew Chou's message of Sat, 25 May 96 00:14:36 EDT <199605250414.AA04094@swan.lcs.mit.edu>
Subject: Grades meeting

   From: achou@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Andrew Chou)
   Date: Sat, 25 May 96 00:14:36 EDT

   All the finals (including Sam's) have been graded and entered
   in the spreadsheet.  So, I guess the only thing left is he
   grades meeting, which we had planned for Sat at 1pm.  Ok?
   -- Andrew

You guys are great!

I'm available from 10am on, so 1pm is fine.  Phone me home at home,
332-8194, if you want to schedule an earlier time.

Regards, A. 


0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from nightingale.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA09118; Thu, 30 May 96 19:17:25 EDT
Received: from nightingale.lcs.mit.edu by nightingale.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA20266; Thu, 30 May 96 19:15:18 EDT
Message-Id: <199605302315.AA20266@nightingale.lcs.mit.edu>
X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.2 7/18/95
To: 6042-tas
Subject: finals
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Thu, 30 May 96 19:15:18 -0400
From: kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu


does anyone know where the finals are?

I need the grade on Gong Ke Shen's final. I think she took the conflict and I 
need to check if her grade of 42 is the adjusted grade or not.

thanks,
--Jakov



0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <dmjones@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from sandpiper.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA09180; Thu, 30 May 96 19:24:55 EDT
From: dmjones@theory.lcs.mit.edu (David M. Jones)
Received: by sandpiper.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA20717; Thu, 30 May 96 19:25:53 EDT
Date: Thu, 30 May 96 19:25:53 EDT
Message-Id: <199605302325.AA20717@sandpiper.lcs.mit.edu>
To: kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu
Cc: 6042-tas
In-Reply-To: kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu's message of Thu, 30 May 96 19:15:18 -0400 <199605302315.AA20266@nightingale.lcs.mit.edu>
Subject: finals


> does anyone know where the finals are?

They're in my office at the back of the top drawer in the first file
cabinet to the left as you enter my office.  If the door is locked,
maybe the janitor can let you in.  If the file cabinet is locked, the
key is in the front of the middle drawer in my desk.  There's a group
of about a dozen file cabinet keys on a chain together; the one you
want is labeled S111.

David.


0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from stork.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA05819; Sat, 01 Jun 96 09:50:51 EDT
From: meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Albert R. Meyer)
Received: by stork.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA26901; Sat, 01 Jun 96 09:53:02 EDT
Date: Sat, 01 Jun 96 09:53:02 EDT
Message-Id: <199606011353.AA26901@stork.lcs.mit.edu>
To: kucan
Cc: 6042-teachers
Subject: [grlee@MIT.EDU: 6.042 Grades]

Jakov,

Please put the final class ranking score histogram on the course web page.
If we can get one for the final exam grades without great effort, put that
up too.

Thanks, A.




0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from stork.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA05869; Sat, 01 Jun 96 09:54:30 EDT
From: meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Albert R. Meyer)
Received: by stork.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA26904; Sat, 01 Jun 96 09:56:41 EDT
Date: Sat, 01 Jun 96 09:56:41 EDT
Message-Id: <199606011356.AA26904@stork.lcs.mit.edu>
To: grlee@MIT.EDU
In-Reply-To: George R. Lee, Jr.'s message of Fri, 31 May 1996 20:16:07 -0400 <v02140b01add53b81ef5f@[18.245.1.7]>
Subject: 6.042 Grades
Cc: 6042-teachers, jones

   X-Sender: grlee@po10.mit.edu (Unverified)
   Date: Fri, 31 May 1996 20:16:07 -0400
   From: grlee@MIT.EDU (George R. Lee, Jr.)

   Hello Prof. Meyer,

   I was wondering what class average was on the final exam.  I got a 61 on
   the final exam and I was wondering what that came out to.  Also, I was wondering
   if I could get my final exam back because I ended up with a D in the course
   and I would like to know what things I didn't know on the exam.

   Thank you.

   George Lee

You're welcome call my secretary David Jones, dmjones@theory.lcs.mit.edu,
(617) 253-5936 to arrange a time to look at and/or copy (we keep the
original) your final in my office NE43-315.  I don't know the averages
offhand, but I've asked the TA's to put histograms on the course homepage.

Yours truly,
Prof. Albert R. Meyer
MIT Lab. for Computer Science


0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from nightingale.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA05194; Mon, 03 Jun 96 14:32:01 EDT
Received: from nightingale.lcs.mit.edu by nightingale.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA00137; Mon, 03 Jun 96 14:29:57 EDT
Message-Id: <199606031829.AA00137@nightingale.lcs.mit.edu>
X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.2 7/18/95
To: 6042-teachers
Subject: grade of a student...
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Mon, 03 Jun 96 14:29:56 -0400
From: kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu


A student in the class, Janis Stippins, claims he had missed two tutorials 
because of medical problems. If he were excused for these absences, his grade 
would go from a C to a B- or possibly a B (he has a very solid, above average, 
performance in the course, except for the final 64).

What can we do about it given his claim is legitimate and he can provide us 
with a proof? What kind of proof do we need to change his grade?

Thanks,
--Jakov

p.s. bellow is my correspondence with the student.

------- Forwarded Message

Return-Path: kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu
Return-Path: <kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from nightingale.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA05011; Mon, 03 Jun 96 14:22:31 EDT
Received: from nightingale.lcs.mit.edu by nightingale.lcs.mit.edu 
(5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA29913; Mon, 03 Jun 96 14:20:27 EDT
Message-Id: <199606031820.AA29913@nightingale.lcs.mit.edu>
X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.2 7/18/95
To: jstipins@MIT.EDU
Cc: kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu
Subject: Re: [jstipins@MIT.EDU: Hello....] 
In-Reply-To: Your message of Mon, 03 Jun 96 14:07:57 -0400.
             <199606031807.SAA22386@dzintars.mit.edu> 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Mon, 03 Jun 96 14:20:26 -0400
From: kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu

> Jakov, 
> 
> Thank you very much for explaining my grade this term.  I certainly
> cannot argue with the grades given.  I am wondering something about
> tutorials, though; I missed two of them because of medical problems
> this term.  Would it make a difference (i.e., change a C to a B) if
> I could produce a medical excuse for these absences?  Or would that
> not make a significant difference?
> 
> Thank you very much,
> -Janis

Janis,

I'm sorry you haven't brought the issue before. This might make a difference. 
However, I have to consult with the rest of the staff.

Can you provide any kind of proof that you were sick, or for whatever related 
reason unable to attend the tutorials on particular dates? Have you talked 
about it with any of 6.042 TAs or professors?

I'll discuss you case with oher TAs and Prof. Meyer and Rivest.

Regards,
- --Jakov


------- End of Forwarded Message




0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from nightingale.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA05983; Mon, 03 Jun 96 15:13:04 EDT
Received: from nightingale.lcs.mit.edu by nightingale.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA00573; Mon, 03 Jun 96 15:11:00 EDT
Message-Id: <199606031911.AA00573@nightingale.lcs.mit.edu>
X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.2 7/18/95
To: meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Albert R. Meyer)
Cc: 6042-teachers
Subject: Re: [grlee@MIT.EDU: 6.042 Grades] 
In-Reply-To: Your message of Sat, 01 Jun 96 09:53:02 -0400.
             <199606011353.AA26901@stork.lcs.mit.edu> 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Mon, 03 Jun 96 15:10:59 -0400
From: kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu


I put the histogram for the final exam on the web page.

--Jakov



0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from eagle.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA06121; Mon, 03 Jun 96 15:16:57 EDT
Received: from eagle.lcs.mit.edu by eagle.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA22200; Mon, 03 Jun 96 15:18:58 EDT
Message-Id: <199606031918.AA22200@eagle.lcs.mit.edu>
To: 6042-teachers
Subject: FYI: students' inquiries on grades
Date: Mon, 03 Jun 96 15:18:56 -0400
From: kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu


Here is a correspondence I had with a student regarding his garde in
the course.

Regards,
--Jakov

--------------------------------------------------------------------

Return-Path: jshare@MIT.EDU
Return-Path: <jshare@MIT.EDU>
Received: from MIT.EDU (SOUTH-STATION-ANNEX.MIT.EDU) by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA11197; Thu, 30 May 96 23:09:52 EDT
Received: from RINGWORLD.MIT.EDU by MIT.EDU with SMTP
	id AA01093; Thu, 30 May 96 23:08:22 EDT
Received: (from jshare@localhost) by ringworld.MIT.EDU (8.6.11/8.6.11) id XAA21555; Thu, 30 May 1996 23:09:52 -0400
Message-Id: <199605310309.XAA21555@ringworld.MIT.EDU>
To: kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu
Cc: jshare@MIT.EDU
Subject: 6.042
Date: Thu, 30 May 1996 23:09:50 EDT
From: Jordan Share <jshare@MIT.EDU>

Hi.  I wanted ask you if you would be willing to send my advisor email
regarding my performance in 6.042.

I realize that I got the lowest grade in the class, however after we
talked about my grade shortly before drop date, I began to take the
class quite seriously.  If you look at the records of the tutorial
attendance, I went to all but one of the tutorials after that time, even
though I had already missed more than 5.  I also did all the PS from
then on.  I don't know what the average grades were on those problem
sets, but I felt that I did well.

Anyway, I'm not trying to ask you to favor me or anything, but if you
agree that I did start to work harder in the class after we talked, it
would be very helpful if you could tell my advisor this.  He will be
going before theCAP on my behalf soon and I can use any help I can get.

His email address is rclarson@mit.edu, and he said that a short email
note would be helpful.

Please let me know where you stand on this issue.  Thanks,

Jordan


Return-Path: kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu
Return-Path: <kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from nightingale.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA20482; Fri, 31 May 96 12:06:59 EDT
Received: from nightingale.lcs.mit.edu by nightingale.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA26106; Fri, 31 May 96 12:04:56 EDT
Message-Id: <199605311604.AA26106@nightingale.lcs.mit.edu>
X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.2 7/18/95
To: rclarson@mit.edu
Cc: kucan
Subject: Jordan Share's performance in 6.042/18.062
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Fri, 31 May 96 12:04:56 -0400
From: kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu


Dear Professor Larson,

I was one of the four TAs in 6.042/18.062 this Spring. Your advisee, Jordan 
Share, has asked me to inform you of his performance in the class.

Performance in 6.042 was measured as follows. We had 14 tutorials, 3 quizzes, 
9 problem sets and the final. Tutorial attendance (and participation) counted 
as 20% of the grade, problem sets as 30%, each quiz as 10% and the final as 
20%.

Tutorials: Jordan Share did not attend any of the tutorials until the 6th week 
of class. After that he attended 6 out of 9, and presented the solution to 
assigned problems twice. His presentations were not exemplary, but 
nevertheless satisfactory.

Problem sets: Jordan Share only turned in the last three (out of nine) problem 
sets. The scores were as follows: PS7 53%, PS8 92% and PS9 22%. The average on 
the problem sets was around 65% - 70%.

Quizzes and the final: Share's scores on the quizzes were 55, 50 and 55 
compared to class average/standard dev. 59/22, 65/20, 70/18. His score on the 
final was 60 compared with class average/std. dev. 71/13.

Finally, Jordan Share's overall performance ranked last in the class out of 
101 students with next to last overall score being ~10% higher.

I attribute the Share's poor performance in the course mainly to the poor 
attendance in the tutorials and not writing the homework, both of which 
improved by the very end of the term. His test scores are comparable with 
students who got C- and C in the course, but, of course, did much better in 
tutorials and on homeworks.

I hope this information will help you evaluate Jordan Share's overall 
performance in the course. If you need more questions, please feel free to 
contact me.


Sincerely,

--Jakov Kucan
  6.042/18.062 Teaching Assistant




0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from eagle.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA06226; Mon, 03 Jun 96 15:22:23 EDT
Received: from eagle.lcs.mit.edu by eagle.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA22209; Mon, 03 Jun 96 15:24:24 EDT
Message-Id: <199606031924.AA22209@eagle.lcs.mit.edu>
To: 6042-teachers
Subject: FYI: students' inquiries on grades
Date: Mon, 03 Jun 96 15:24:22 -0400
From: kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu


Here is a correspondence I had with a student regarding her grade.

Regards,
--Jakov


-------------------------------------------------

Return-Path: fifo@MIT.EDU
Return-Path: <fifo@MIT.EDU>
Received: from MIT.EDU (SOUTH-STATION-ANNEX.MIT.EDU) by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA00341; Thu, 30 May 96 11:35:58 EDT
Received: from RINGWORLD.MIT.EDU by MIT.EDU with SMTP
	id AA25465; Thu, 30 May 96 11:34:28 EDT
Received: (from fifo@localhost) by ringworld.MIT.EDU (8.6.11/8.6.11) id LAA18192; Thu, 30 May 1996 11:35:57 -0400
From: Gong Ke Shen <fifo@MIT.EDU>
Message-Id: <199605301535.LAA18192@ringworld.MIT.EDU>
To: kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu
Date: Thu, 30 May 1996 11:35:56 EDT

Hi, My name is Gong Ke Shen, one of the students in your 6.042
tutorial.  I was just wondering wether or not you would have my grade
for the term.  Thank you.


-------------------------------------------------

Return-Path: kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu
Return-Path: <kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from nightingale.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA00611; Thu, 30 May 96 11:48:35 EDT
Received: from nightingale.lcs.mit.edu by nightingale.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA14368; Thu, 30 May 96 11:46:32 EDT
Message-Id: <199605301546.AA14368@nightingale.lcs.mit.edu>
X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.2 7/18/95
To: Gong Ke Shen <fifo@MIT.EDU>
Cc: kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu
In-Reply-To: Your message of Thu, 30 May 96 11:35:56 -0400.
             <199605301535.LAA18192@ringworld.MIT.EDU> 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Thu, 30 May 96 11:46:32 -0400
From: kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu

> Hi, My name is Gong Ke Shen, one of the students in your 6.042 tutorial.  I was just wondering wether or not you would have my grade for the term.  Thank you.

Hi,

You got 42 on the final and a D in the course.

Regards,
--Jakov

-----------------------------------------------------

Return-Path: fifo@MIT.EDU
Return-Path: <fifo@MIT.EDU>
Received: from MIT.EDU (PACIFIC-CARRIER-ANNEX.MIT.EDU) by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA04070; Thu, 30 May 96 15:03:30 EDT
Received: from CACCIATORE.MIT.EDU by MIT.EDU with SMTP
	id AA28525; Thu, 30 May 96 15:01:58 EDT
From: fifo@MIT.EDU
Received: by cacciatore.MIT.EDU (5.57/4.7) id AA18795; Thu, 30 May 96 15:03:27 -0400
Message-Id: <9605301903.AA18795@cacciatore.MIT.EDU>
To: kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu
Date: Thu, 30 May 1996 15:03:26 EDT

Hi, t'is me again... would you please tell me what I had in 6.042 before the final and what the average and standard dev was on the final?  thank you!

-----------------------------------------------------

Return-Path: kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu
Return-Path: <kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from nightingale.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA04554; Thu, 30 May 96 15:26:03 EDT
Received: from nightingale.lcs.mit.edu by nightingale.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA14598; Thu, 30 May 96 15:24:00 EDT
Message-Id: <199605301924.AA14598@nightingale.lcs.mit.edu>
X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.2 7/18/95
To: fifo@MIT.EDU
Cc: kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu
In-Reply-To: Your message of Thu, 30 May 96 15:03:26 -0400.
             <9605301903.AA18795@cacciatore.MIT.EDU> 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Thu, 30 May 96 15:24:00 -0400
From: kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu

> Hi, t'is me again... would you please tell me what I had in 6.042 before the final and what the average and standard dev was on the final?  thank you!

here is how your score compares with the rest of the class

	tut's(20%)	PS(30%)	Q1(10%)	Q2(10%)	Q3(10%)	F(20%)	Total	
you	100		65	44	46	53	42	62
average			69	59	65	70	71	75
std dev			22	22	20	18	13	12

regards,
--Jakov

---------------------------------------------------

Return-Path: fifo@MIT.EDU
Return-Path: <fifo@MIT.EDU>
Received: from MIT.EDU (PACIFIC-CARRIER-ANNEX.MIT.EDU) by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA08493; Thu, 30 May 96 18:34:18 EDT
Received: from RINGWORLD.MIT.EDU by MIT.EDU with SMTP
	id AA10016; Thu, 30 May 96 18:32:46 EDT
Received: (from fifo@localhost) by ringworld.MIT.EDU (8.6.11/8.6.11) id SAA29783; Thu, 30 May 1996 18:34:16 -0400
From: Gong Ke Shen <fifo@MIT.EDU>
Message-Id: <199605302234.SAA29783@ringworld.MIT.EDU>
To: kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu
Date: Thu, 30 May 1996 18:34:16 EDT

Hello,

Sorry to bother you again.  I really appreciate your time and help.

I was taking 6.002 and 3 other classes this term.  I tried very hard to
do my best in 6.042 (as you can see, my quiz grades increased steadily).
I realize that the final didn't go as well as it could.  I had had 3
other finals in the two days before 6.042... I was extremely tired.
Also, I had to take the harder conflict exam because of travel plans... 

Anyway, I guess what I'm trying to say is that, I could have and would
have done much better on the final had I been under a different
circumstance... and from what you've shown me, I guess I failed by only
1 point... is there any possibilities that you could still pass me?

I really appreciate all the time and help you've given to our class, and I
would be very very grateful if you would pass me.  It means a lot to
me...

Thank you very much!


-- Gong Ke

---------------------------------------------------

Return-Path: kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu
Return-Path: <kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from nightingale.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA08969; Thu, 30 May 96 19:12:16 EDT
Received: from nightingale.lcs.mit.edu by nightingale.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA20118; Thu, 30 May 96 19:10:14 EDT
Message-Id: <199605302310.AA20118@nightingale.lcs.mit.edu>
X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.2 7/18/95
To: Gong Ke Shen <fifo@MIT.EDU>
Cc: kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu
In-Reply-To: Your message of Thu, 30 May 96 18:34:16 -0400.
             <199605302234.SAA29783@ringworld.MIT.EDU> 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Thu, 30 May 96 19:10:13 -0400
From: kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu

> Hello,
> 
> Sorry to bother you again.  I really appreciate your time and help.
> 
> I was taking 6.002 and 3 other classes this term.  I tried very hard to
> do my best in 6.042 (as you can see, my quiz grades increased steadily).
> I realize that the final didn't go as well as it could.  I had had 3
> other finals in the two days before 6.042... I was extremely tired.
> Also, I had to take the harder conflict exam because of travel plans... 
> 

The conflict final was slightly harder, but the scores were adjusted 
appropriately. You basically got 15 extra points on the final so that the 
average on the conflict final matches the average on the regular final.

> Anyway, I guess what I'm trying to say is that, I could have and would
> have done much better on the final had I been under a different
> circumstance... and from what you've shown me, I guess I failed by only
> 1 point... is there any possibilities that you could still pass me?
> 

I don't see how you conclude that you failed by 1 point.

> I really appreciate all the time and help you've given to our class, and I
> would be very very grateful if you would pass me.  It means a lot to
> me...
> 
> Thank you very much!
> 
> 
> -- Gong Ke

I can't pass you (nor fail you). The grades were determined jointly by the 
entire 6.042 staff. If you think there is an error in the way we computed your 
grade, it can be corrected.

If you believe, that given the circumstances, we were unfair to you, you 
should contact Professor Meyer or Professor Rivest about it. I don't have the 
authority to change your grade, but if you want, I can talk to one of them on 
your behalf. If you still think you have been treated unfairly, you can talk 
to the Dean of Undergraduate Affairs.

I understand you had a tough semester, but other students had a busy schedule 
as well. We based the grades on demonstrated performance in 6.042, and not on 
students' overall load.

Five courses a semester is a pretty heavy load, so do not be discouraged if 
you didn't do so well in all of them.

Regards,
--Jakov




0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from nightingale.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA06358; Mon, 03 Jun 96 15:29:53 EDT
Received: from nightingale.lcs.mit.edu by nightingale.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA00653; Mon, 03 Jun 96 15:27:45 EDT
Message-Id: <199606031927.AA00653@nightingale.lcs.mit.edu>
X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.2 7/18/95
To: jstipins@MIT.EDU
Cc: 6042-teachers
Subject: Re: [jstipins@MIT.EDU: Hello....] 
In-Reply-To: Your message of Mon, 03 Jun 96 14:44:07 -0400.
             <199606031844.SAA22495@dzintars.mit.edu> 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Mon, 03 Jun 96 15:27:40 -0400
From: kucan@theory.lcs.mit.edu


Janis,

As I said before I can't decide on this myself, so I'm copying this message to 
the rest of the 6042 staff. We'll let you know soon as possible on what we can 
do.

Regards,
--Jakov


> Jakov,
> 
> After I missed the first one, I emailed Andrew, and he said that it
> was difficult to make up for a missed tutorial, although I believe he
> made reference to a medical excuse being valid.  However, it was the
> first one, so I didn't worry about it too much.  But then I had to
> miss another, and the last one I just forgot about.  So I only have a
> legitimate excuse for missing the first two.
> 
> The problem is this: I have migraines sometimes that leave me unable
> to see (or stand up, or walk, etc...), and they strike at totally
> random times -- about once a month.  It is a very difficult thing to
> "prove" that they really happen to me, and they only medical "excuse"
> I could easily produce is to show my prescription medication.  To be
> honest, migraines could be a convenient affliction for an unscrupulous
> student, in that he could choose to skip tutorials, exams, etc, and
> then claim to have had a migraine.  Because of this fact, I perfectly
> understand if you and the course administrators decide that I should
> not be excused from the two missed tutorials.  When it gets down to
> it, you really only have my word that I was physically unable to
> attend the tutorials.
> 
> I have had to deal with this problem for about ten years now, and over
> that period of time I've been fairly lucky; I've never had a migraine
> on the day of an exam (well, once in high school), and over all, I
> have missed only a handful of appointments because of them.  As I
> said, they are truly, uniformly distributed -- the odds are that they
> will hit me on a day that is not very important.  However, it happened
> that I had two of them this term, both on Wednesdays.  If it is
> possible to be excused somehow, and raise my grade to a B, that would
> be great.  If not, I am prepared to accept my bad luck.
> 
> Please let me know what I should do.
> 
> Thank you,
> -Janis



0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <chou_andrew@jpmorgan.com>
Received: from jpmgate1.jpmorgan.com (jpmorgan.jpmorgan.com) by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA07882; Mon, 03 Jun 96 16:39:35 EDT
Received: from host.domain (mrzip.ny.jpmorgan.com [146.149.1.2]) by jpmgate1.jpmorgan.com (8.7.4/8.7.5) with SMTP id QAA14229 for <6042-teachers@theory.lcs.mit.edu>; Mon, 3 Jun 1996 16:39:35 -0400
Received: from deriv-6000.ny.jpmorgan.com (deriv-6000.ny.jpmorgan.com [198.75.24.121]) by mrzip.ny.jpmorgan.com (8.7.4/8.7.3) with ESMTP id QAA26068 for <6042-teachers@theory.lcs.mit.edu>; Mon, 3 Jun 1996 16:39:40 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from nydr-devc11.ny.jpmorgan.com (nydr-devc11.ny.jpmorgan.com [198.75.24.54]) by deriv-6000.ny.jpmorgan.com (8.6.10/8.6.9)
           with SMTP id QAA12089 for <6042-teachers@theory.lcs.mit.edu>; Mon, 3 Jun 1996 16:39:12 -0400
Date: Mon, 3 Jun 1996 16:39:12 -0400
From: Andrew Chou <chou_andrew@jpmorgan.com>
Message-Id: <199606032039.QAA12089@deriv-6000.ny.jpmorgan.com>
To: 6042-teachers@theory.lcs.mit.edu

My email now works.
Following up on his message, Janis did ask me to be excused for a tutorial.
He told me the day after the tutorial and didn't say anything
besides he was sick.  So, I told him it was late and he should
just use his excuse tutorial, and that's the last I heard of it.

I may have scared him off, cause he seems to have switched tutorials
at that point.  Anyways, he did seem competent as his test scores
indicate he's a B student.  However, I'll leave it up to the rest of
you to determine his grade.

-- Andrew



0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from stork.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA29156; Tue, 04 Jun 96 16:01:21 EDT
From: meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Albert R. Meyer)
Received: by stork.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA27855; Tue, 04 Jun 96 16:03:36 EDT
Date: Tue, 04 Jun 96 16:03:36 EDT
Message-Id: <199606042003.AA27855@stork.lcs.mit.edu>
To: jstipins@MIT.EDU
Subject: 6.042 medical excuse
Cc: 6042-teachers

I suggest you discuss your medical situation and how it impacted 6.042
tutorials with the student dean's office.  Upon their recommendation, we
will reconsider your 6.042 grade.

Yours truly,
Prof. Albert R. Meyer
MIT Lab. for Computer Science


0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <jstipins@MIT.EDU>
Received: from MIT.EDU (PACIFIC-CARRIER-ANNEX.MIT.EDU) by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA29758; Tue, 04 Jun 96 16:38:01 EDT
Received: from DZINTARS.MIT.EDU by MIT.EDU with SMTP
	id AA06793; Tue, 4 Jun 96 16:36:23 EDT
From: jstipins@MIT.EDU
Received: by dzintars.mit.edu (8.7.1/4.7) id UAA26135; Tue, 4 Jun 1996 20:37:54 GMT
Message-Id: <199606042037.UAA26135@dzintars.mit.edu>
To: meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu, 6042-teachers@theory.lcs.mit.edu
Cc: mthembu@MIT.EDU
Subject: 6.042 medical excuse
Date: Tue, 04 Jun 1996 16:37:54 EDT

>I suggest you discuss your medical situation and how it impacted 6.042
>tutorials with the student dean's office.  Upon their recommendation, we
>will reconsider your 6.042 grade.

>Yours truly,
>Prof. Albert R. Meyer
>MIT Lab. for Computer Science

I have spoken with Dean Ayida Mthembu about my medical situation.  
She is willing to provide whatever form is necessary to make an
official recommendation in favor of excusing the absences.  It is
unclear, though, which forms are appropriate at this point in the
term; it is too late for an excused absence form.  

Please email Dean Mthembu (mthembu@mit.edu) and cc the email to me,
to let us know what you need.  

Thank you very much.

-Janis Stipins III


0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from stork.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA12766; Wed, 05 Jun 96 09:53:46 EDT
From: meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Albert R. Meyer)
Received: by stork.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA27954; Wed, 05 Jun 96 09:56:02 EDT
Date: Wed, 05 Jun 96 09:56:02 EDT
Message-Id: <199606051356.AA27954@stork.lcs.mit.edu>
To: jstipins@MIT.EDU
Cc: 6042-teachers@theory.lcs.mit.edu, mthembu@MIT.EDU
In-Reply-To: jstipins@MIT.EDU's message of Tue, 04 Jun 1996 16:37:54 EDT <199606042037.UAA26135@dzintars.mit.edu>
Subject: 6.042 medical excuse

A phone call to me from Dean Mthembu should suffice.  I'm at home today at
332-8194, office tomorrow at x36024.

Yours truly,
Prof. Albert R. Meyer
MIT Lab. for Computer Science


1,,
Return-Path: <meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from stork.lcs.mit.edu by theory.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2S) 
	id AA06943; Tue, 11 Jun 96 16:06:44 EDT
From: meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Albert R. Meyer)
Received: by stork.lcs.mit.edu (5.65c/TOC-1.2C) 
	id AA03712; Tue, 11 Jun 96 16:09:06 EDT
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 96 16:09:06 EDT
Message-Id: <199606112009.AA03712@stork.lcs.mit.edu>
To: jstipins@MIT.EDU
Cc: 6042-teachers@theory.lcs.mit.edu, mthembu@MIT.EDU
In-Reply-To: jstipins@MIT.EDU's message of Tue, 04 Jun 1996 16:37:54 EDT <199606042037.UAA26135@dzintars.mit.edu>
Subject: 6.042 medical excuse

*** EOOH ***
From: meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Albert R. Meyer)
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 96 16:09:06 EDT
To: jstipins@MIT.EDU
Cc: 6042-teachers@theory.lcs.mit.edu, mthembu@MIT.EDU
In-Reply-To: jstipins@MIT.EDU's message of Tue, 04 Jun 1996 16:37:54 EDT <199606042037.UAA26135@dzintars.mit.edu>
Subject: 6.042 medical excuse

I spoke to Dean Mthembu who endorses your medical excuse for absence from
two 6042 tutorials.

I am now filing a Special Report Sheet to change your grade ferom C to B-.

The form requests your student ID--what is it?

Note that your name did not appear on the registrar's final list of
students enrolled for 6.042J/18.062, nor could I find a listing for you in
MIT info.

Yours truly,
Albert R. Meyer
Hitachi America Professor of Engineering
MIT Lab. for Computer Science 

