X-Coding-System: nil
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2002 13:43:19 -0500 (EST)
From: Lee C Lin <leelin@MIT.EDU>
To: <6042-meyer@theory.lcs.MIT.EDU>
Subject: Re: q2 seems ready
In-Reply-To: <200211141603.gAEG38c13972@parrot.lcs.mit.edu>
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.4 required=5.0 tests=IN_REP_TO version=2.20
X-Spam-Level: 

Hello,

I was a test-taker this time around but the exam kept changing so anything
I turn in now would have very old comments anyway.  I tried stopping by
your office right now but you were busy with someone else.

Two comments:

Problem 1 should probably make a clarification so that students won't
fall for an "off-by-one" error.  Either that or we could accept both
answers while grading.  I know when I did the problem I came up with the
other answer.

I believe the solutions to the Theory Hippo problem has a glitch in the
solutions to part c... shouldn't two of the terms be swapped?

The rest looks fine... I believe Problem 4e had a solutions glitch at 4
AM last night, but it looks revised and fixed now.

Lee Lin



On Thu, 14 Nov 2002, Albert R. Meyer wrote:

> What I hope is the final, polished version of quiz 2 is krypted in
> devel/quiz2/q2.pdf with solutions in q2sol.pdf.  This version reflects all
> the comments I've received; thanks for sending them.
>
> I'd be grateful if you'd take a quick look at the parts that bothered you
> and check that your concerns have been met.  I've acted on nearly all the
> suggestions and criticisms, except for the last problem -- where I revised
> instead of junking it as was suggested by a couple of you.
>
> We go to press at 2pm.
>
> Regards, A.
>
>